首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of h
admin
2013-10-22
37
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon.com’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image.-libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change(if anything, people may read ore, or at least buy more—several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things- records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books — have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral(并行的)damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. 1 can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught —and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century(almost none of them, 1 should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even here my mother is spinning in her grave write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were(starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music playlist, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles(音响爱好者)have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile(触觉的)pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
The popularity of e-books may make e-book owners______.
选项
A、buy more e-books for their readers
B、read more books on the screen
C、eventually give up traditional books
D、change the mind of readers
答案
A
解析
细节归纳题。根据定位句括号中的内容可知,如果说读者有什么改变的话,那就是他们读更多的电子书,至少买更多的电子书,另一方面,电子书所有者们也为其读者购买更多的电子书。故正确答案为A)“为其读者购买更多的电子书”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/vMQFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
OneofAmerica’smostimportant【B1】______ishermodernmusic.Americanpopularmusicisplayedallovertheworld.Itisenjoye
A、Theyhelpusseetheimportantvaluesofaculture.B、Theyguideusinhandlinghumanrelationships.C、Theyhelpusexpressou
AfterthePresident’sSonsWereImprisonedIndividualsmakeuphistory,whilehistorygovernsindividuals’actionsandthoug
Inthe1960s,manypeopleinNorthAmericaturnedtheirattentiontoenvironmentalproblems,andnewsteel-and-glassskyscrapers
A、It’sverytraditional.B、It’sterrific.C、It’stoomodern.D、It’senjoyable.C女士说这场戏并不精彩(notreally表明其观点),她更喜欢传统的戏剧。由此可推知这场戏剧表
A、90B、108C、180D、668D细节题。从选项可以看出该题考查数字。本文中数据很多,听的时候应该一一记录与不同数字相关的信息。听到90时写下captain;听到108时写下gamesforEngland;听到668时写下matches;
Therearealotofgoodcamerasavailableattilemoment—mostofthesearemadeinJapanbuttherearealsogood【B1】______models
___________(只有以这种方式我们才能获得)alltheinformationweneededinourresearch.
InancientGreeceathleticfestivalswereveryimportantandhadstrongreligiousassociations.TheOlympianathleticfestival,【
A、Willpowerandhardship.B、Pleasure,joyandhardship.C、Freedom,joyandpleasure.D、Joy,freedomandwillpower.C短文开头提到的…rese
随机试题
查询最近30天的记录应使用()作为准则。
(2009年4月)属于共产主义社会基本特征的有______、______、______。
已知,则f(x)=__________.
在美国有一位名叫玛丽的女佣人,她能做非常好吃的饭菜。在她15年的女佣生活中,她所工作过的许多家庭传播了伤寒50例以上。她传播病源的可能途径是
A、胃液酸度升高B、胃液酸度正常或减少C、胃液酸度常减少D、胃液酸度明显升高E、胃液酸度明显减少重度胃体萎缩型胃炎
关于单位犯罪,下列说法不正确的有是:①因最高人民法院为我国最高司法机关,所以,最高人民法院不可能成为单位犯罪的主体②在我国,单位犯罪具有法定性,对于单位实施的危害社会的行为,只有刑法明文规定为单位犯罪的,单位才负刑事责任。我国刑法没有规
请认真阅读下列材料,并按照要求作答。跨越海峡的生命桥1999年9月22日,早晨7时30分,阳光洒满了美丽的杭州市,桂树还没有开花,晨风中已经飘来甜丝丝的香气。小钱静静地躺在病床上。灿烂的阳光没有使他苍白的脸红润起来。这个刚满1
赵某涉嫌杀人,一审法院以故意杀人罪判处其无期徒刑;赵某提起上诉,二审维持原判。多年后,真凶落网。此事经媒体跟踪报道,在社会上引起强烈反响。检察机关继而提起抗诉,经再审,赵某被宣告无罪。请结合上述材料,运用法理学中法律监督的知识和原理,回答下列问题:(20
A、Inarestaurant.B、Inahotel.C、Inasupermarket.D、Inalibrary.BWherehasthewomanworkedduringhersummerholiday?
Whenateacher【B1】______astudenttoreadabookit’susuallyforaparticularpurpose.Thebookmay【B2】______usefulinformatio
最新回复
(
0
)