首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where la
admin
2022-10-18
35
问题
In the United States, injuries to passengers involved in automobile accidents are typically more severe than in Europe, where laws require a different kind of safety belt. It is clear from this that the United States needs to adopt more stringent standards for safety belt design to protect automobile passengers better.
Each of the following, if true, weakens the argument above EXCEPT:
选项
A、Europeans are more likely to wear safety belts than are people in the United States.
B、Unlike United States drivers, European drivers receive training in how best to react in the event of an accident to minimize injuries to themselves and to their passengers.
C、Cars built for the European market tend to have more sturdy construction than do cars built for the United States market.
D、Automobile passengers in the United States have a greater statistical chance of being involved in an accident than do passengers in Europe.
E、States that have recently begun requiring the European safety belt have experienced no reduction in the average severity of injuries suffered by passengers in automobile accidents.
答案
D
解析
The argument suggests that passengers involved in automobile accidents in the United States typically are more seriously injured than those in Europe. Furthermore, in Europe, a different safety belt design is used. The argument suggests that these
European-style safety belts are more protective against serious injury than those used in the United States. Furthermore, it suggests that the United States would therefore benefit by adopting more stringent design standards for safety belts.
To clarify, the rate of severe injuries would indicate, for example, the number of seriously injured passengers per 100,000 passengers involved in automobile accidents. Note that this rate does not depend on the total number of passengers involved in automobile accidents.
However, many other factors could provide an alternative explanation for these differences in rate of severe injury. The question stem asks us which answer choice does NOT weaken the argument; in other words, we must find a factor among the answer choices that does NOT account for this difference in the rate of severe injury. Effectively, we will be looking for the answer that has no bearing on the rate of severe injury.
Which one of the statements given does NOT weaken the argument?
A This choice weakens the argument. It suggests the possibility that the difference in rates of severe injury is due to the number of people who actually wear safety belts in the U.S. versus in Europe. This rate is, of course, irrespective of the functionality of the belts themselves. In other words, the effectiveness of the belt design is irrelevant if the belt is not being worn in the first place.
B This choice weakens the argument. Training to understand how to minimize injury, rather than a safety belt design difference, may be a primary factor accounting for the lower severe injury rate in Europe.
C This choice weakens the argument. The fact that cars constructed in Europe are more sturdy may account for the lower severe injury rate in Europe rather than the difference in the types of safety belts used.
D Correct. This choice does not weaken the argument. The higher likelihood that one is involved in an automobile accident in the U.S. actually has no bearing on the higher rate of severe injury among passengers who are involved in automobile accidents. That is, the rate itself is a proportion of the total number of passengers involved in accidents rather than the number itself. This rate would remain the same whether 10 accidents or 10 million accidents occurred.
E This answer choice suggests that even implementation within the United States of the European safety belt design does not seem to change serious injury rates. This implies, of course, that some other factor is likely responsible for the differences in rates of serious injury between the U.S. and Europe.
The correct answer is D.
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/smdYFFFM
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
Firecanhelppeopleinmanyways.Butitcanbeverydangerous.Firecanheatwater,warmhouses,givelightandcook.Butfire
Howcanwegetridofgarbage?Dowehaveenoughenergysourcestomeetourfutureenergyneeds?Thesearetwoimportantqu
Forthispart,youareallowedthirtyminutestowriteacompositiononthetopic"MyIdealJob".Youshouldwriteatleast120
TheUnitedStates【C1】______alargepartoftheNorthAmericancontinent.ItsneighborsareCanada【C2】______thenorth,andMexico
Toronto’sthirdCityHall,nowknownasOldCityHall,wasdesignedbyEdwardJamesLennoxanddeclaredopenonSept.18,1899.
Directions:Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteacompositiononthetopic"MetropolisorSmallTown?"Youshould
Imagineaschoolthatexpecteditsstudentstobecomeliteratewithoutanyformalinstruction.Mostparentswouldbealarmedby
Science,inpractice,dependsfarlessontheexperimentsitpreparesthanonthepreparednessofthemindsofthemenwhowatch
Bytheyear2050,expertsbelievethattheproblemstoexplorethefood,mineralsandenergyresourcesoftheseawillhavebeen
Toronto’sthirdCityHall,nowknownasOldCityHall,wasdesignedbyEdwardJamesLennoxanddeclaredopenonSept.18,1899.
随机试题
A、Themanisstillexpectingthenextepisode.B、Thenextepisodewillbereleasednextyear.C、Themanwillreschedulehistime
淋证的主要病机有
枸橼酸盐抗凝的原理主要是
力强有毒,专入心经,治心火亢盛诸证之要药的是()。
根据事故的具体情况,事故调查组由有关人民政府、安全生产监督管理部门、负有安全生产监督管理职责的有关部门、监察机关、公安机关以及工会派人组成,并应当邀请()派人参加。
发明数字0—9的是().
按照刑法的规定,不得假释的犯罪分子包括()。
ThenumberofpeopleemigratingfromIrelandiscurrentlyestimatedat30,000annually.Thereisnodoubtthatthebulkofyoun
考生文件夹下存在数据库“学籍”,其中包含course和score表,这两个表存在一对多的联系。对“学籍”数据库建立文件名为form2的表单,表单标题为“课程成绩查看”,其中包含两个表格控件。第一个表格控件用于显示“课程”表的记录,第二个表格控件用
户外广告是现代城市景观中不可或缺的部分,反映着城市的繁荣程度.文化特色和品位。企业热切地希望通过户外广告不断提升形象,传播商业信息。各级政府也希望通过它树立城市形象,美化(beautify)城市。户外广告将会有广阔的市场,同时也对其提出了更高的要求。随着现
最新回复
(
0
)