首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning
admin
2011-02-28
40
问题
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning it. Most of the people living in Darling work for the company, so there have been a few complaints. The local radio station has interviewed five people about their views on the issue. For questions 61 to 65, match the name of each person to one of the statements ( A to G) given below. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.
Mrs. Sue Pearson:
We don’t want to be here, but what can we do? You see, last year my husband found out that he had cancer. Doctors advised us to leave Darling. We planned to buy a farm 50 miles away. But before we could save enough money for the deposit, he lost his job. Now I can’t see how we’ll ever be able to get away from him. I don’t know what to do.
George Clark:
I certainly do not accept that my company is responsible. We can’t be responsible. It is an absolutely ridiculous opposition. If people choose to work here or live nearby, they must accept the risks. We did not bring the company to the town. The town grew up round the chemical factory. And part of the reason the town is such a thriving community today, is because of my company. Of course, there is a little pollution. There is always pollution in the chemical industry. It can’t be helped because this country needs chemicals — without this company 3,000 people would be jobless.
Richard Carr:
I think the Darling Chemical Company should be held fully responsible for the trouble and the suffering they have brought to the local people. We are suing for over a million pounds in compensation, and we are also asking for a court order to close the factory. I’m confident that we shall win. What worries me is that it’s impossible to stop this kind of thing until it’s too late. I think the government should have introduced strict pollution controls long ago.
Linda Jackson:
I think pollution is a crime against society and must be punished. Already many towns are worse than Darling. If we don’t act soon, this country will be uninhabitable. I propose to fix strict limits for discharge of pollution. All companies which exceed these limits negligently will pay heavy fines. All companies which exceed the limits deliberately will be closed and their managers will go to prison.
Graham Paterson:
Pollution from the factories is not the only problem. Motor vehicles and aircraft pollute the air. Oil tankers pollute the sea. Many city governments discharge sewage into their rivers and leave mountains of garbage in the countryside. Pollution occurs everywhere and it is getting worse and worse. However, all of this could be avoided. There are engines which do not cause air pollution. Garbage can be recycled and sewage can be converted to energy. Private companies won’t make the necessary investments. This money really does have to come from the government.
Now match each of the persons to the appropriate statement.
Note: There are two extra statements.
Statements
A. I think pollution is a crime against society and must be punished.
B. I strongly demand that the chemical factory be closed by legal means, and that the government be criticized for not introducing strict pollution controls.
C. The coming pollution of the environment is one of the biggest problems we are facing now.
D. I think the Darling Chemical Company should be responsible for my husband’s illness.
E. I think that pollution is a widespread problem but that it could be avoided if the government makes the necessary investments.
F. I do not accept that my company is responsible for anything, and people in Darling should be grateful to his company for providing 3,000 jobs.
G. It is generally believed that environmental pollution has adverse effects on human health.
Richard Cart
选项
答案
B
解析
Richard Carr强烈要求化工厂依法关闭,认为政府应该严格管理环境问题。这与B项的表述一致。故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/sQzsFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
ThecoreofGreece’stroublesistoomuchspending,toolittletax-collectingandbook-cooking.SpainandIrelandareintroubl
Whyare"Clovispeople"believedtofirstenterNorthAmerica?
Whatisthemostfundamentaldifferencebetweenplantsandanimals?
HowmanychildrendidSusanandMichaelinterview?
【T1】Whiletherearealmostasmanydefinitionsofhistoryastherearehistorians,modernpracticemostcloselyconformstoone
Parentsnowhaveapopularbeliefthatschoolsarenolongerinterestedinspelling.NoschoolIhavetaughtinhaseverignored
Aspartofmorecomprehensivecomplianceandethicsprograms,manycompanieshaveformulatedinternalpoliciespertainingtothe
Properarrangementofclassroomspaceisimportanttoencouraginginteraction.Mostofushavenoticedhowimportantphysicalse
Whatarethespeakersdoingastheconversationbegins?
Whoaretalkinginthisdialogue?
随机试题
下列叙述中错误的有()
国际物流网络系统中的各节点的目的是()
工程网络计划资源优化的目的之一是为了寻求( )。
钢筋实测抗拉强度与实测屈服强度之比不小于()。以下4种钢筋强度最低的是()。
ABL基因位于九号染色体上,若发生图1所示的现象,会导致白血病。ABL基因如果发生基因突变又会导致某种单基因遗传病(相关基因用D,D表示),其临床表现为先天性心脏功能障碍或骨骼发育异常等,图2表示遗传病的某家系图。根据图1判断,导致白血病的变异类型是
某公司有甲、乙、丙、丁四人,他们的籍贯分别为北京、上海、天津、南京。一日,四人在谈论他们各自的籍贯。甲说:“我和乙都不是上海人,丙是天津人。”乙说:“我是上海人,丙是天津人,丁不是北京人。”丙说:“甲不是上海人,我是南京人,丁是北京人。”丁说:“我
2015年7月,中国A股持续下跌,许多证券公司纷纷暂停了融券交易,在这种情况下,套利机制是否有效?套利机制的有效性受哪些因素影响?(复旦大学金融4312016年)
2019年3月10日,习近平在全国人大福建代表团强调,要向改革开放要动力,最大限度释放全社会创新、创业、创造动能,不断增强我国在世界大变局中的影响力、竞争力。创新发展注重的是解决()
在提示符下,要修改数据库TEST.DBF的结构,应用命令()。
一间宿舍可住多个学生,则实体宿舍和学生之间的联系是
最新回复
(
0
)