首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
29
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______.
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/rV3GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Ifitwereonlynecessarytodecidewhethertoteachelementarysciencetoeveryoneonamassbasisortofindthegiftedfewan
Thereislittleneedformarketingintheplacesuchasasubsistencefarm,because______.By"haveahandintheprocessoft
Thehighincometaxisharmful______itmaydiscouragepeoplefromtryingtoearnmore.
Peeringintothe21stcentury,authoritiesonthefutureseeextraordinarychanges.Newscientificbreakthroughwillallowmachi
Itwasessentialthattheapplicationforms______backbeforethedeadline.
WhatwasthehightemperatureinColumbus,OhioonDecember12?Howmanycitieshadatemperaturebelow0°sometimesduringthe
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
(79)TheOlympicGamesareheldeveryfouryearsinadifferentcityintheworld.Athletesfrommanycountriescompeteinavari
CliffordStollranacomputersysteminBerkeley,California.Asasystemadministrator,hekeptacloseeyeontherecords.One
随机试题
肌张力减退可见于
关于高脂血症的危险因素,不包括
《建筑设计防火规范》关于建筑高度和层数的正确说法是()。
1.2015年1月26日下午,国务院总理李克强主持召开专家学者和企业界人士座谈会。会上,来自高校、科研单位、金融机构的专家学者对当前经济形势各抒己见,来自互联网、电子信息、创业投资、建筑材料等行业的企业负责人分别就行业发展及经济走势谈了看法。大家认为,在去
我国《宪法》规定,对任何公民的逮捕必须经过哪个国家机关的决定或批准?()
罗斯福新政之所以取得成功,其根本原因是()。
准确性质量子特性属于______质量特性。
以下程序的功能是:删去一维数组中所有相同的数,使相同的数只剩一个。数组中的数已按由小到大的顺序排列,函数fun返回删除后数组中数据的个数。例如,若一维数组中的数据是:22234456
考生文件夹下存在一个数据库文件“samp3.accdb”,里面已经设计了表对象“tEmp”、窗体对象“fEmp”、报表对象“rEmp”和宏对象“mEmp”。试在此基础上按照以下要求补充设计:将“fEmp”窗体上名为“bTitle”的标签文本颜色改为红色
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledFoodContamination.Youshouldwriteatleast120wor
最新回复
(
0
)