首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Is science infinite? Can it keep giving us profound insights into the world forever? Or is it already bumping into limits? In hi
Is science infinite? Can it keep giving us profound insights into the world forever? Or is it already bumping into limits? In hi
admin
2021-12-15
19
问题
Is science infinite? Can it keep giving us profound insights into the world forever? Or is it already bumping into limits? In his 2011 book The Beginning of Infinity physicist David Deutsch made the case for boundlessness. When I asked him about consciousness, he replied; "I think nothing worth understanding will always remain a mystery. And consciousness seems apparently worth understanding. "
At a meeting I just attended in Switzerland, " The Mystery of Human Consciousness," another famous British physicist, Martin Rees, challenged Deutsch’s optimism. In that essay Rees calls The Beginning of Infinity "provocative and excellent" but disputes Deutsch’s central claim that science is boundless. Science "will hit the buffers (缓冲区) at some point," Rees warns.
There are two reasons why this might happen. The optimistic one is that we clean up and understand certain areas (such as atomic physics) to the point that there’s no more to say. A second, more worrying possibility is that we’ll reach the limits of what our brains can grasp. There might be concepts, crucial to a full understanding of physical reality. Efforts to understand very complex systems, such as our own brains, might well be the first to hit such limits. Perhaps complex collectives of atoms, whether brains or electronic machines, can never know all there is to know about themselves.
The riddle of consciousness is a synecdoche for the riddle of humanity. What are we, really? For most of our history, religion has given us the answer. We are immortal souls, children of a loving god, striving to reach heaven. Most modern scientists reject these religious explanations, but they cannot agree on an alternative. They have proposed a bewildering variety of answers to the question of what we really are.
Science will never resolve these disagreements and converge on a single, true theory of what we are, for two reasons. One is that we will never have a "consciousness meter," an objective means of measuring consciousness in non-human things. The other is that we are too varying, too creative, to be captured by single theory. Science itself keeps transforming us, with technologies as diverse as brain implants, genetic therapy and ideas as diverse as queer theory and integrated information theory. To be human means to be a work in progress.
Deutsch’s claim that science is infinite also has a contradiction at its core. He wants science to solve the deepest mysteries, like consciousness, and yet to have more mysteries to solve, forever. That is a radical assertion about the structure of nature, which to my mind reflects wishful thinking rather than hard-headed realism.
Deutsch is both wrong and right. He is wrong that science can solve every mystery, and especially consciousness. We will never understand, once and for all, who we are. But Deutsch is right that science is potentially infinite, if infinite means never-ending. It is precisely because we can never achieve total self-knowledge that we will keep seeking it forever.
The real reason for science to "hit the buffers" may be that________.
选项
A、science will inevitably experience its bottleneck period
B、the cognitive ability of humanity cannot be boundless
C、people are over-optimistic about the development of science
D、complicated systems are unable to be fully understood
答案
B
解析
由题干中的hit the buffers定位到原文第二段最后一句和第三段。事实细节题。本题考查科学“进入缓冲区”的原因。第三段提到了两个可能的原因,第一个是我们已经将一些领域理清并理解,达到了言尽于此的地步,而第二个原因是人类将会达到大脑认知的极限,故答案为B)。A)“科学将不可避免地进入瓶颈期”,从原文相关段落来看,作者所讨论的问题是科学是否会到达极限的问题,而不是瓶颈期,故排除;C)“人们对科学的发展过于乐观”,由原文可知,人们的态度并不是科学是否会“进入缓冲区”的原因,故排除;D)“复杂的体系是无法被完全了解清楚的”只是作者给出的第二个原因所导致的结果,该项混淆了因果关系,故排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/rBaFFFFM
0
大学英语六级
相关试题推荐
IncreasedScreenTimeandWellbeingDeclineinYouthA)Haveyoungpeopleneverhaditsogood?Ordotheyfacemorechalleng
CompaniesAreWorkingwithConsumerstoReduceWasteA)Asconsumers,weareverywasteful.Annually,theworldgenerates1.
Apple’sStanceHighlightsaMoreConfrontationalTechIndustry[A]ThebattlebetweenAppleandlawenforcementofficialsoveru
OfficialsattheWhiteHouseannouncedanewspacepolicyfocusedonmanagingtheincreasingnumberofsatellitesthatcompanies
EffectiveFriday,ScreenActorsGuild-AmericanFederationofTelevisionandRadioArtists(SAG-AFTRA)hasdeclaredastrikeagai
Whatistheplaceofartinacultureofinattention?RecentvisitorstotheLouvrereportthattouristscannowspendonlyami
Whatistheplaceofartinacultureofinattention?RecentvisitorstotheLouvrereportthattouristscannowspendonlyami
TheChallengesforArtificialIntelligenceinAgricultureA)Agroupofcornfarmersstandshuddledaroundanagronomist(农学家
APioneeringWomanofScienceRe-Emergesafter300Years[A]MariaSibyllaMerian,likemanyEuropeanwomenofthe17thcentury,
随机试题
神经管可分化为()
下列药物能弥散进气管导管套囊,使囊内压增高的是
一孕妇因胎盘早剥诱发DIC,阴道失血约500ml,P100次/分,血压90/60mmHg,PLC55×109/L,首要的治疗是
下列不属于药学职业道德原则的是()。
发包人按照合同约定采购的门窗,现场交货前未通知承包人派代表共同进行现场交货清点,单方与供货人检验接收后,口头指令承包人的仓库保管员负责保管,施工使用时发现部分门窗损坏,则应由( )。
基金行业自律组织是由()成立的行业自律组织。①基金持有人②基金管理人③基金托管人④基金销售机构
根据我国《增值税暂行条例》的规定,下列项目中,其进项税额不得从销项税额中抵扣的有()。
()是“二战”后法国年鉴学派的第二代领袖和史学大师。
《越宫律》27篇的作者是()。
“三个代表”重要思想深化了对中国特色社会主义的认识,表现在
最新回复
(
0
)