首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
38
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
The word
those
in Paragraph 3 refers to______.
选项
A、Carter and his party
B、grave robbers
C、ancient Egyptians
D、the contents of the tomb
答案
C
解析
本题属于指代题,考查考生认定代词与篇章中其他词语的指代关系的能力。题目问:文章中的those指代的是什么?根据第3段,those后有一个who引导的定语从句“who sealedthe tomb originally”,即“最早封墓的人”,来修饰限定those。而最早封墓的人应该是古代埃及人,因此选C项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/pOhYFFFM
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completethenotesbelow:WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Threefactorscontributingtotheefficiencyoftheag
Completetheformbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.INSURANCE
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSorANUMBERforeachanswer.workmantocallbetween【T10】______and______
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
AMessengerfromthePastHispeoplesaidgood-byeandwatchedhimwalkofftowardthemountains.Theyhadlittlereasonto
"PhysicsClass"Howdoestheprofessorexplaintheclosedstring?
DorothyCrowfootHodgkinWhenDorothyCrowfootHodgkinwastenyearsold,shewatchedherfirstcrystalsformonastringda
随机试题
简述公共政策变动的原因。
马心搏动最明显的部位是左侧
社区健康促进不包括
入汤剂宜包煎的药物是
某人在参加商场有奖销售中取得中奖所得18000元,他领取奖金时拿出6000元通过民政部门捐给灾区,则最后实际得到的金额是( )元。
在非上市债券评估中。()决定风险报酬率的大小。
弹性利润预算的编制方法有()。
医生诊疗费用的低下与药品加成的过高,共同形成了以药养医的现状。它保证了公共医院在数据上的收支平衡,却导致了“大处方”“新特贵药”“过度医疗”等现象的出现,让医生和患者都容易成为扭结的医疗制度及以其为轴的社会冲突的代偿者。前一段时间,患者魏则西的去世和医生陈
随着城市化和现代化进程的展开,公共空间正在成为人们的主要生活领域,这些空间既包括有形的,如地铁、公交等,也包括无形的,如网络论坛、微博等。公共空间既要容纳个人权利的行使,也需要维持基本的公序良俗。若将个人权利推向极致,难免有损公共利益;过于强调公共空间的秩
Myaunttriedherbestto______thesituation,butthedamagewasalreadydone.
最新回复
(
0
)