2. 外语
  3. Many different meanings have been given to the word poetry. It would weary my readers if I were to discuss which of these defini

Many different meanings have been given to the word poetry. It would weary my readers if I were to discuss which of these defini

admin2013-01-28  43
问题     Many different meanings have been given to the word poetry. It would weary my readers if I were to discuss which of these definitions ought to be selected; I prefer telling them at once that which I have chosen. In my opinion, Poetry is the search after, and the delineation of, the Ideal.
    The Poet is he who, by suppressing a part of what exists, by adding stone imaginary touches to the picture, and by combining certain real circumstances that do not in fact happen together, completes  and extends the work of nature. Thus the object of poetry is not to represent what is true, but to adorn it and to present to the mind some loftier image. Verse, regarded as the idem beauty of language,  may be eminently poetical; but verse does not of itself constitute poetry.
    I now proceed to inquire whether among the actions, the sentiments, and the opinions of democratic  nations there are any which lead to a conception of the ideal, and which may for this reason be considered as natural sources of poetry.
    It must, in the first place, be acknowledged that the taste for ideal beauty, and the pleasure derived from the expression of it, are never so intense or so diffused among a democratic as among an aristocratic people. In aristocratic nations it sometimes happens that the body acts as it were spontaneously, while the higher faculties are bound and burdened by repose. Among these nations the people will often display poetic tastes, and their fancy sometimes ranges beyond and above what surrounds them.
    But in democracies the love of physical gratification, the notion of bettering one’ s condition, the excitement of competition, the charm of anticipated success, are so many spurs to urge men onward  in the active professions they have embraced, without allowing them to deviate for an instant from the track. The main stress of the faculties is to this point. The imagination is not extinct, but its chief function is to devise what may be useful and to represent what is real. The principle of equality  not only diverts men from the description of ideal beauty; it also diminishes the number of objects to be described.
    Aristocracy, by maintaining society in a fixed position, is favorable to the solidity and duration of positive religions as well as to the stability of political institutions. Not only does it keep the human  mind within a certain sphere of belief, but it predisposes the mind to adopt one faith rather than another. An aristocratic people will always be prone to place intermediate powers between God and man. In this respect it may be said that the aristocratic element is favorable to poetry. When the universe  is peopled with supernatural beings, not palpable to sense, but discovered by the mind, the imagination ranges freely; and poets, finding a thousand subjects to delineate, also find a countless audience to take an interest in their productions.
    In democratic ages it sometimes happens, on the contrary, that men are as much afloat in matters  of faith as they are in their laws. Skepticism then draws the imagination of poets back to earth and confines them to the real and visible world. Even when the principle of equality does not disturb religious conviction, it tends to simplify it and to divert attention from secondary agents, to fix it principally on the Supreme Power.
    Aristocracy naturally leads the human mind to the contemplation of the past and fixes it there. Democracy, on the contrary, gives men a sort of instinctive distaste for what is ancient. In this respect  aristocracy is far more favorable to poetry; for things commonly grow larger and more obscure as they are more remote, and for this twofold reason they are better suited to the delineation of the ideal.
How does the author contrast aristocratic and democratic societies in their response to religion?
选项 A、Democratic societies are more receptive than aristocratic societies.
B、Aristocratic societies are more receptive than democratic societies.
C、Aristocratic societies are not as receptive as democratic societies.
D、Democratic societies axe just as more receptive as aristocratic societies
答案B
解析 文章第六段中提到Aristocracy is favorable to the solidity and duration of positive  religions，即他们对宗教信仰的态度是支持的，第七段提到In democratic ages，这种情况正相反，B项内容符合文意。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/owqYFFFM
0

考博英语

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)