首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is
admin
2020-03-31
30
问题
[A] On the other hand are two compelling arguments against placing a duty on humans to protect endangered species. The first is essentially the Darwinian argument that extinction results from the inexorable process of so-called "natural selection" in which stronger species survive while weaker ones do not. Moreover, we humans are not exempt from the process. Accordingly, if we see fit to eradicate other species in order to facilitate our survival, then to be it. We are only behaving as animals must, Darwin would no doubt assert.
[B] As I see it, there are three fundamental arguments for imposing on ourselves at least some responsibility to preserve endangered species, The first has to do culpability. According to this argument, to the extent that endangerment is the result of anthropogenic evenis such as clear-cutting of forests or polluting of lakes and streams, we humans have a duty to take affirmative measures to protect the species whose survival we’ve placed in jeopardy.
[C] The second argument, and the one that I find most compelling, is an appeal to logic over emotion. It is a scientific fact that thousands of animal species become extinct every year. Many such extinctions are due to natural forces, while others are due to anthropogenic factors. In any event it is far beyond our ability to save them all. By what standard, then, should we decide which species are worth saving and which ones are out? In my observation, we tend to favor animals with human-like physical characteristics and behaviors. This preference is understandablei after all, dolphins are far more endearing than bugs. But there is no logical justification for such a standard. Accordingly, what makes more sense is to decide based on our own economic self-interest. In other words, the more money and jobs it would cost to save a certain species, the lower priority we should place on doing so.
[D] What are the limits of our duty to save endangered species from extinction? The statement raises a variety of issues about morality, conscience, self-preservation and economics. On balance, however, I fundamentally agree with the notion that humans need not make "extraordinary" efforts—at the expense of money and job— to ensure the preservation of any endangered species.
[E] We should appeal to self-preservation. The animal kingdom is an intricate matrix of interdependent relationships, in which each species depends on many others for its survival. Severing certain relationships, such as that between a predator and its natural prey, can set into motion a series of extinctions that ultimately might endanger our own survival as a species. While this claim might sound far-fetched to some, environmental experts assure us that in the long run it is a very real possibility.
[F] The issue of endangered-species protection is a complex one, requiring subjective judgments about moral duty and the comparative value of various life-forms. Thus, there are no easy or certain answers. Yet it is for this very reason I agree that economic self-interest should take precedence over vague notions about moral duty when it comes to saving endangered species. In the final analysis, at a point when it becomes critical for our own survival as a species to save certain others, then we humans will do so if we are fit—in accordance with Darwin’s observed process of natural selection.
[G] The second argument has to do with capability. This argument disregards the extent to which we humans might have contributed to the endangerment of a species. Instead, the argument goes, if we are aware of the danger, know what steps are needed to prevent extinction, and can take those steps, then we are morally obligated to help prevent extinction. This argument would place a very high affirmative duty on humans to protect endangered species.
Order:
选项
答案
G
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/obq7FFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
With950millionpeople,IndiarankssecondtoChinaamongthemostpopulouscountries.ButsinceChina【C1】______afamilyplan
Inthelate1960’s,manypeopleinNorthAmericaturnedtheirattentiontoenvironmentalproblems,andnewsteel-and-glassskysc
Inthelate1960’s,manypeopleinNorthAmericaturnedtheirattentiontoenvironmentalproblems,andnewsteel-and-glassskysc
Allaroundtheworld,lawyersgeneratemorehostilitythanthemembersofanyotherprofession—withthepossibleexceptionofjo
LongbeforeManlivedontheEarth,therewerefishes,reptiles,birds,insects,andsomemammals.Althoughsomeoftheseanimal
Writealetteraccordingtothesituationbelow:Youhavereceivedterribletreatment,andyourrightshavebeenseverelyviolat
【F1】Materialculturereferstothetouchable,material"things—physicalobjectsthatcanbeseen,held,felt,used—thatacultu
Duringthetraditionalweddingceremony,the【C1】______couplepromiseeachotherlifelongdevotion.Yet,aboutoneoutoffourAm
OnSeptember19th,nearlyfivemonthsafterthespillstarted,BPfinallysealedtheMacondowell.Anadjoiningreliefwellhad
随机试题
甲方向乙方发出出卖某一产品的要约函件,乙方向甲方发出买入该产品的要约函件,且两份要约函件内容中有关质量、价格、数量等条款完全一致。此种情形称为______。
在气街中,以下错误的一项是:气街的意义是:
某药厂生产的固本咳喘片,药物组成有党参、白术(麸炒)、茯苓、盐补骨脂、麦冬、醋五味子、炙甘草,功能益气固表,健脾补肾,主治脾虚痰盛、肾气不固所致的咳喘、痰多、喘息气促、动则喘剧;慢性支气管炎、肺气肿、支气管哮喘。以下不属于醋炙的作用的是()。
下列项目投资评价指标中,受建设期的长短、各年现金流量的数量特征以及资本成本高低共同影响的是()。
下列表述中正确的有()。
教师备课需要做好的工作不包括()。
抗生素的发明和使用,使病菌一度不再是人类的致命威胁。但是,在人类使用抗生素治疗疾病的同时,病菌的耐药性也在增加,由于滥用抗生素,出现了目前难以控制的“超级病菌”。上述事实表明()。
《公安机关组织管理条例》规定,公安机关履行警务指挥职务的人民警察实行警官职务序列。下列选项中属于公安机关执法勤务机构警官职务的是()。
Mybrother________hardandsucceededatlast.
It’sagoodideatoapplysunscreenbeforeheadingtothebeachifyoudon’twanttoburn.Butformarineanimalslikewhales,t
最新回复
(
0
)