首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Being good-looking is useful in so many ways. In addition to whatever personal pleasure it gives you, being attractive also help
Being good-looking is useful in so many ways. In addition to whatever personal pleasure it gives you, being attractive also help
admin
2014-09-05
42
问题
Being good-looking is useful in so many ways. In addition to whatever personal pleasure it gives you, being attractive also helps you earn more money, find a higher-earning spouse and get better deals on mortgages. Each of these facts has been demonstrated over the past 20 years by many economists and other researchers. The effects are not small: one study showed that an American worker who was among the bottom one-seventh in looks, as assessed by randomly chosen observers, earned 10 to 15 percent less per year than a similar worker whose looks were assessed in the top one-third — a lifetime difference, in a typical case, of about $230,000.
Most of us, regardless of our professed attitudes, prefer as customers to buy from better-looking salespeople, as jurors to listen to better-looking attorneys, as voters to be led by better-looking politicians, as students to learn from better-looking professors. This is not a matter of evil employers’ refusing to hire the ugly: in our roles as workers, customers and potential lovers we are all responsible for these effects.
How could we remedy this injustice? A radical solution may be needed-, why not offer legal protections to the ugly, as we do with racial, ethnic and religious minorities, women and handicapped individuals? We actually already do offer such protections in a few places, including in some jurisdictions in California, and in the District of Columbia, where discriminatory treatment based on looks in hiring, promotions, housing and other areas is prohibited. The mechanics of legislating this kind of protection are not as difficult as you might think. Ugliness could be protected generally in the United States by small extensions of the Americans With Disabilities Act. Ugly people could be allowed to seek help from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission and other agencies in overcoming the effects of discrimination.
You might argue that people can’t be classified by their looks — that beauty is in the eye of the beholder. In one study, more than half of a group of people were assessed identically by each of two observers using a five-point scale; and very few assessments differed by more than one point.
There are possible other objections. "Ugliness" is not a personal trait that many people choose to embrace; those whom we classify as protected might not be willing to admit that they are ugly. But with the chance of obtaining extra pay and promotions amounting to $230,000 in lost lifetime earnings, there’s a large enough incentive to do so. Bringing antidiscrimination lawsuits is also costly, and few potential plaintiffs could afford to do so. But many attorneys would be willing to organize classes of plaintiffs to overcome these costs, just as they now do in racial-discrimination and other lawsuits.
Economic arguments for protecting the ugly are as strong as those for protecting some groups currently covered by legislation. So why not go ahead and expand protection to the looks-challenged? There’s one legitimate concern. With increasingly tight limits on government resources, expanding rights to yet another protected group would reduce protection for groups that have commanded our legislative and other attention for over 50 years. You might reasonably disagree and argue for protecting all deserving groups. Either way, you shouldn’t be surprised to see theUnited States heading toward this new legal frontier.
The result of the study mentioned in Paragraph 4 demonstrates that______.
选项
A、people’s judgment on looking varies greatly
B、people’s judgment on looking is generally the same
C、beauty is in the eye of the beholder
D、judgment on looking depends on your relationship with the person
答案
B
解析
本题主要考查对文章第四段内容的理解。第四段作者主要反驳了为丑人立法的一种质疑。有的人认为对人的容貌的判定并没有统一的标准。“that beauty is in the eye of thebeholder”。但是一项实验却表明,大多数人对某个人的长相判断都是相同的,也就是说基于容貌的法律保护是有依据的。[B]正确。[A]和[C]利用文中“that beauty is in the eye of thebeholder”设置干扰。[D]是无中生有。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/oBMRFFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Writeanessayof160~200wordsbasedonthefollowingtable.Inyourwriting,youshould1)describethetable,2)analyzere
Yourschool’sStudentUnionisofferingEnglishtutoringservicestochildrenatasmallfee.AsamemberoftheStudentUnion,
Afteryougraduatefromuniversity,wouldyouratherbeseff-employed,workforsomeoneelseorownabusiness?Pleasewrit
Attemptstounderstandtherelationshipbetweensocialbehaviorandhealthhavetheirorigininhistory.Dubos(1969)suggested
ThestudiescitedbytheNationalEatingDisordersAssociationisbasedon______.TheauthorcitessomeWestchesterschoolsto
Beforethe20thcenturythehorseprovideddaytodaytransportationintheUnitedStates.Trainswereusedonlyforlong-distan
Speech,whetheroralorwritten,isausedcommodity.Ifwearetobeheard,wemust(1)_____ourwordsfromthose(2)_____tou
Alzheimer’sdiseaseisaproblemofoldage.InAmerica,thereisabouta50%chancethatanindividualwillhavedevelopeditb
Themostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringforyourselfsomethin
Themostexcitingkindofeducationisalsothemostpersonal.Nothingcan【C1】______thejoyofdiscoveringforyourselfsomethin
随机试题
排土场选址时应避免最大可能成为()的重大危险源。
A.1年B.2年C.3年D.5年E.10年根据《中华人民共和国药品管理法》规定,医疗机构制剂许可证的有效期为
(共用备选答案)A.地西泮B.普萘洛尔C.利福平D.苯乙肼E.维拉帕米可加重心脏负性肌力和心力衰竭的药品是
图中相互之间可以列总流伯努利方程的断面是:
()的发生是不确定的,这种不确定性是由内外部环境的复杂性和人们对于未来变化的预测能力有限而导致的。
运用“头脑风暴法”进行集体讨论时,应遵循的原则有()。
义务教育的(),是义务教育最本质的特征。
甲对某危害结果没有阻止其发生的义务,如果该危害结果发生,甲的不作为行为()。
下列有关运算符重载的叙述中,正确的是()。
Idon’tdoubt______thestockmarketwillrecoverfromtheeconomiccrisis.
最新回复
(
0
)