MANAGEMENT consultants, investment banks and big law firms are the Holy Trinity of white-collar careers. They recruit up to a th

admin2016-01-29  30

问题     MANAGEMENT consultants, investment banks and big law firms are the Holy Trinity of white-collar careers. They recruit up to a third of the graduates of the world’s best universities. They offer starting salaries in excess of $ 100,000 and a chance of making many multiples of that. They also provide a ladder to even better things. The top ranks of governments and central banks are sprinkled with Goldman Sachs and McKinsey veterans. Technology firms, though they are catching up fast, have nothing like the same grip on the global elite. Which raises a pressing question: how do you maximize your chances of joining such elite professional-services firms?
    Lauren Rivera of Northwestern University’s Kellogg School of Management has spent a decade studying how these firms recruit. According to her, the best way to get into the tiny group of elite firms is to be studying at the tiny group of elite universities. The firms spend millions of dollars love-bombing these institutions with recruiting events; students can spend the recruitment season wining and dining at their expense. However, as Ms. Rivera notes, firms reject the vast majority of elite students they interview: so even the most pedigreed need to learn how to game the system. The most important tip is to look at who is doing the recruiting. The firms use revenue-generating staff rather than human-resources people to decide who has the right stuff.
    The interviewers are trying to juggle their day jobs with their recruiting duties. In the interview room they behave predictably: they follow a set script, starting with some ice-breaking chit-chat, then asking you about yourself, then setting a work-related problem. That makes them desperate for relief from the tedium. Be enthusiastic. Hang on their every word. And flatter their self-image as "the best of the best . The most important quality recruiters! are looking for is "fit" : for all their supposedly rigorous testing of candidates, they would sooner choose an easy-going person with a second-class mind than a Mark Zuckerberg-type genius who rubs people up the wrong way.
    Staff in professional-services firms spend most of their time dealing with clients; so looking the part is essential. They also expect their employees to spend extraordinary amounts of time together—learning the ropes in boot camps, working late in the office, having constant work dinners, getting stuck together in airports in godforsaken places.
    One candidate in Ms. Rivera’s sample passed the interview by adopting the persona of a successful consultant that he knew at that firm. Even if you do not go that far, you must at all costs avoid appearing nerdy or eccentric. The old-fashioned belief still prevails that playing team sports, especially posh ones like rowing, makes for a rounded character. The final key to success is to turn your interviewer into a champion; someone who is willing to go to bat for you when the hiring committee meets to whittle down the list.
Why are the technology firms less attractive for global elite compared with the Holy Trinity?

选项 A、Technology firms recruit up less than a third of the graduates of the world’s best universities.
B、There is an income gap between the technology firms and the Goldman Sachs and McKinsey.
C、The post of technology firms cannot help them hunt a job in management consultants.
D、The chance to hold investment post for technology firms’ employees is remote.

答案B

解析 根据题干定位到第一段倒数第二句:Technology firms,though they are catchihg up fast,have nothing like the same grip on the global elite.原因就是have nothing like the same grip,也就是“技术公司不具备和那3类公司同样的优势(grip)”,这就是原因!这3类公司的优势包括:钱多,人脉广,离职后还能去政府和央行。所以答案就是[B],我是用Goldman Sachs and McK-insey代替了那3类公司,你不要觉得不爽。对应的句子就是:They offer starting salaries in ex一cess of $100,000 and a chance of making many multiples of that.其他三个选项都是拼凑的选项!一定要选最佳选项!
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/nQZ7FFFM
0

最新回复(0)