首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
[A] So next time your child counts using her fingers, or you see your employees spreading out information over their desks and w
[A] So next time your child counts using her fingers, or you see your employees spreading out information over their desks and w
admin
2019-09-15
8
问题
[A] So next time your child counts using her fingers, or you see your employees spreading out information over their desks and walls, be reassured: they are not limited in their capacity to think well, nor are they handicapping their ability to do so. In fact, they are enhancing their ability to think. Your mind does not think like a computer, but it thinks with the objects (including computers) and people around you. And our capacity to think and reason well, at any given moment, depends as much on our cognitive abilities as it does on the richness—or paucity—of material things which support our thinking and decision-making.
[B] Our ability to think and reason has been trained and tested in real world situations that restrict our ability to use our hands. For example, at school, children quickly learn to count "in their heads" without using their fingers as props. The implicit assumption that underpins the practice is that truly intelligent behavior originates from the inner parts of the brain, and the brain alone. Recent research strongly challenges this assumption, showing instead that people’s thoughts, choices and insights can be transformed by physical interaction with things. In other words, thinking with your brain alone— like a computer does—is not equivalent to thinking with your brain, your eyes, and your hands—as humans frequently do. Consider a game of Scrabble: players naturally touch, move and re-arrange the tiles they receive. If thinking were simply done "in the head", what’s the purpose of these moves?
[C] To put this to the test, researchers design thinking tasks under laboratory conditions during which people can physically interact with the properties of the problem. Interactivity inevitably benefits performance. In part this is because changes in the physical environment make it easier for people to remember what information they are considering. But also dynamically changing the problem’s configuration prompts new possibilities for action, or unveils new ways of solving problems. People are more creative and more efficient when solving problems with their hands: thinking is an embodied activity embedded in a physical environment.
[D] They also applied this approach to the study of complex statistical reasoning. Previous research had found that, depending on the ease of mentally representing the statistical information presented, between 11 percent and 40 percent of people succeeded in solving these reasoning problems using just pen and paper.
[E] In fact, these moves are integral to the process of generating words. As players reconfigure the physical properties of their environment, they are not simply making it easier for them to think; they are thinking. Moves can be deliberate or serendipitous. This suggests that thinking is fundamentally relational: it unfolds along a series of physical changes in the environment that at times affects, and at times is affected by, a series of biological changes in the brain.
[F] Researchers recently applied this approach to a study of creativity and insight. While posing a problem presented with a classic pencil and paper format never led to a breakthrough, those who could use physical artefacts to build a model of the problem were much more likely to reach some insight, no matter the difference between the participants’ cognitive abilities.
[G] They presented the same information on a pack of cards that reasoners were free to spread out and rearrange in any way they preferred. Not all participants fully engaged with the cards—perhaps unwilling to be judged as poor thinkers for doing so. Yet, the success rate for those who made the most of this opportunity to use the material world to boost their thinking leapt to 75 percent.
选项
答案
B
解析
本题可以用排除法。A、D的位置已经确定,无需考虑。C、E、F、G的开头都含有指示代词(C的To put this to the test、E的these moves、F的this approach以及G的They),这些代词的指代内容应在前文有所交代,故这几段都不可能作为首段。B先指出人们的惯常想法,接着提出相反观点——人在思考时是会手脑并用的,以此引出文章主题,并在结尾处留下一个设问,待下文解决。B符合文章首段的行文特征。故为本题答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/nA87FFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
In1929JohnD.Rockefellerdecideditwastimetosellshareswhenevenashoe-shineboyofferedhimasharetip.Duringthepa
TheBibleisthegreatworkofthereligiousliteratureandwasinprocessofformationforabouttwelvehundredyears.TheB
TheBibleisthegreatworkofthereligiousliteratureandwasinprocessofformationforabouttwelvehundredyears.TheB
TheBibleisthegreatworkofthereligiousliteratureandwasinprocessofformationforabouttwelvehundredyears.TheB
"Thisisareallyexcitingtime—aneweraisstarting,"saysPeterBazalgette,thechiefcreativeofficerofEndemol,thetelev
Americanmythologylovesnothingmorethanthereluctanthero:themanwhosenaturaltalentshavedestinedhimformorethanobl
Thoughnotbiologicallyrelated,friendsareas"related"asfourthcousins,sharingabout1%ofgenes.Thatis【B1】______astudy
Idoubtanyonewithcross-culturalexperiencecanreadOslandandBird’sarticlewithoutrememberingamomentwhencarefulcros
What’saman?Or,indeed,awoman?Biologically,theanswermightseemobvious.Ahumanbeingisa(n)【C1】______whohasgrownfr
What’saman?Or,indeed,awoman?Biologically,theanswermightseemobvious.Ahumanbeingisa(n)【C1】______whohasgrownfr
随机试题
市场研究报告陈述和演示前应作的材料准备不包括
苯丙酮尿症的遗传方式是
蒿芩清胆汤之功用为半夏泻心汤之功用为
患者,女,31岁。3年来妊娠3次,均不足3个月而流产,听力减退,带下清稀,腰部痠痛,舌淡苔白,脉弱。其证候是
以下基金中,托管费率最高的是()。
2015年某居民企业收入总额为3000万元(其中免税收入400万元,符合条件的技术转让收入900万元),各项成本、费用和税金等扣除金额合计1800万元(其中含技术转让准予扣除的金额200万元)。2015年该企业应缴纳企业所得税()万元。
反映教师职业与其他职业不同的本质特征是()。
根据《中华人民共和国民事诉讼法》的规定,审判人员的回避,由()决定。
2011年底,全国拥有水上运输船舶17.92万艘,比上年末增长0.5%;净载重量21264.32万吨,增长17.9%;平均净载重量增长17.3%;集装箱箱位147.52万TEU,增长11.4%;船舶功率5949.66万千瓦,增长11.6%。在2011
Whatcanwelearnfromthenews?
最新回复
(
0
)