The rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than they are in national elections because

admin2016-10-29  37

问题 The rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than they are in national elections because they typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse.

选项 A、The rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than they are in national elections because they typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse
B、Because they typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse, the rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than the rules are in national elections
C、The rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than national elections because they typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse
D、Because local elections typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse than national elections, the rules that govern local political contributions are less stringent than national contributions
E、The rules that govern political contributions are less stringent in local elections than they are in national elections because local elections typically involve smaller amounts of money and present less opportunity for abuse

答案E

解析 根据上述原则,我们首先排除A、C,因为because从句中的they指代不清(它前面有两个复数名词:rules和local/national elections)。剩下B、D、E,在D中有一明显错误:即主句中的比较前后的对象不具可比性,前面是the rules,而than之后是national contributions,排除D,再读B、E,发现明显的区别是:B中第一个they指代the rules(按第8条原则),而E中because之后用local election替换了they,在这里,需要从句意上判断究竟they指代哪一个,local election还是rules?B中,把the rules代入原因从句中,就译为“这些规定涉及较少的钱并且产出更少的滥用机会”,E译为:地区选举涉及较少的钱和产生较少的滥用机会,通过常理和动宾搭配判断,显然E为原意,B错。同D一样,C中主句比较对象前后不一致。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/medYFFFM
本试题收录于: GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0

最新回复(0)