首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing.
admin
2012-07-06
28
问题
From The Tipping Point to Nudge, the rise of pop-social science has been a noticeable feature of the past decade in publishing. Not everyone is impressed. I recently interviewed a professor of education who is an expert in policy evaluation. She lamented the fact that politicians tend to get their facts from popular social science books containing inaccuracies.
I think the professor was right to worry about ministerial exposure to authors such as Malcolm Gladwell, Dan Ariely and even Tim Harford— but not for quite the right reasons. The problem is not that such authors are inaccurate. I’m not sure that they are. Gladwell has plenty of critics, but I find him a careful reporter. And I am told Tim Harford is all but infallible.
Yet infallibility is not enough. It’s perfectly possible for an author to do nothing but weave together credible, peer-reviewed research and yet produce a highly partial view of reality. Different pieces of research invariably point in different directions. Dan Ariely’s Predictably Irrational is full of examples of irrational behaviour. My own Logic of Life is full of examples of rational behaviour. Occasionally I am asked to explain the contradiction, but if there is a contradiction, it is a subtle one.
If Ariely describes a rainy day and I describe a sunny one, we are not really contradicting each other. We each offer our spin, but it’s really about whether most people expect sunshine or rain: Dan says that it’s rainier than we tend to think, while I say the sun shines more often than anyone would credit. A serious review of this metaphorical evidence would count up the rainy days and the sunny ones.
For real policy questions, such reviews exist. They are called systemic reviews. They should be the first port of call for anyone wanting to understand what works. But they are not exactly bestsellers in airport bookshops.
Quite apart from the fact that nobody wants to read all the evidence, there is a deep problem with the way evidence is selected throughout academia. Even a studiously impartial literature review will be biased towards published results. Many findings are never published because they just aren’t very intriguing. Alas, boring or disappointing evidence is still evidence. It is dangerous to discard it, but let’s not blame Malcolm Gladwell just because he doesn’t stick it on page one.
There’s a hierarchy of evidence here. The systemic review tries to track down unpublished research as well as what makes it into the journals. A less careful review will often be biased towards results that are interesting. A peer-reviewed article presents a single result, while a popular social-science book will highlight a series of results that tell a tale. The final selection mechanism is the reader, who will half-remember some findings and forget the rest.
Those of us who tell ourselves we are curious about the world are actually swimming in "evidence" that has been filtered again and again in favour of interestingness. It’s a heady and perhaps toxic drink, but we shouldn’t blame popularisers alone for our choice to dive in. [515 words]
The text intends to tell information users that it’s essential to______.
选项
A、remain sober-minded before intriguing research
B、produce a correct view of reality from contradictory researches
C、compromise between interestingness and objectiveness
D、extract concrete facts from pop social science
答案
A
解析
本题考查文章主旨。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/mQ0RFFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
Inourincreasinglycomplexworld,informationisbecomingthebasicbuildingblockofthesociety.(46)However,atatimewhen
Inthetwodecadesbetween1929and1949,sculptureintheUnitedStatessustainedwhatwasprobablythegreatestexpansionins
Sciencehaslonghadanuneasyrelationshipwithotheraspectsofculture.ThinkofGalileo’s17thcenturytrialforhisrebelli
ItcanbeinferredfromParagraph1thatoneimportantfactorintheincreasingimportanceofeducationintheUnitedStateswas
ItcanbeinferredfromParagraph1thatoneimportantfactorintheincreasingimportanceofeducationintheUnitedStateswas
Underpressurefromanimalwelfaregroups,twonationalscienceteachersassociationshaveadoptedguidelinesthatbanclassroom
Weallknowthatscienceplaysanimportantroleinthesocietiesinwhichwelive.Manypeoplebelieve,however,thatourprogr
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
TheCaliforniancoastlinenorthandsouthofSiliconValleyisatrend-settingsortofplace.Increasingly,thehomeinteriorso
随机试题
某市某区公安局、文化局决定展开联合执法行动,对辖区内的歌舞厅进行检查。一日,二局在对一个舞厅进行检查时,以该歌舞厅属违法经营为由,对歌舞厅作出罚款1万元的处罚决定。据此回答下列问题。若处罚决定经过区人民政府批准,以区公安局、文化局的共同名义作出,歌舞厅
一般在节理发育、构造破碎地带,岩石的特性为()。
火灾和爆炸都会带来生产设施的重大破坏和人员伤亡,两者的发展过程()。
患者,男,27岁,收入微薄,因肾衰竭接受透析4年,为维持透析治疗,已债务缠身,入院期间多次流露自杀想法,甚至拒绝治疗。下列做法不利于缓解患者情绪的是()。
关于中餐礼节不正确的表述有()。
在巴西,通过非洲蜂和当地蜂进行比较研究而得出的结论是,非洲蜂的蜂蜜产量远远高于本地蜂的蜂蜜产量。因此,没有理由担心美国的蜂蜜产量会下降,可以用非洲蜂来替代美国当地的蜜蜂。以下哪项如果为真,就最不能构成对上述论证的质疑?
以往,境内企业进出口只能以美元或第三方货币结算,在合同签约至合同执行完毕期间汇率的变化会使企业的实际盈收出现波动,现在银行推出了人民币结算业务。由于人民币是境内企业的本币,合同计价和企业运营的主要货币相一致,境内企业在合同签订前能够切实了解交易的成本和收入
HowmanychildrendidSusanandMichaelinterview?
Whatisthetopicoftheworkshop?
Musiccomesinmanyforms;mostcountrieshaveastyleoftheirown.【C1】theturnofthelastcenturywhenjazz(爵士乐)wasborn,A
最新回复
(
0
)