首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland. Accordingly, Suriland’ s wheat farmers ar
Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland. Accordingly, Suriland’ s wheat farmers ar
admin
2022-10-18
29
问题
Suriland cannot both export wheat and keep bread plentiful and affordable in Suriland. Accordingly, Suriland’ s wheat farmers are required to sell their crop to the government, which pays them a dollar per bushel less than the price on the world market. Therefore, if the farmers could sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more, less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
选项
A、Suriland’s wheat farmers have higher production costs than do farmers in many other wheat-producing countries.
B、Sale of a substantial proportion of Suriland’s wheat crop on the world market would probably depress the price of wheat.
C、The transportation and brokerage costs that Suriland’s farmers would face if they sold their wheat outside Suriland could amount to almost a dollar per bushel.
D、Suriland is surrounded by countries that do not import any wheat.
E、The price of a bushel of wheat on the world market occasionally drops below the average cost of producing a bushel of wheat in Suriland.
答案
B
解析
To keep bread affordable in Suriland, the country’s government requires that wheat farmers in the country sell their wheat to the government for one dollar per bushel less than the world market price.
This question requires us to identify a statement that seriously weakens the argument. The conclusion of the argument is that, if these wheat farmers could legally sell their wheat on the world market, they would make a dollar per bushel more, minus additional transportation and brokerage costs.
However, this argument assumes that the world market price for wheat is fixed and would not be affected by introducing Suriland’ s wheat supply. That is, it is possible that the world market price per bushel for wheat might decline as a result of an increase in the wheat supply available on that market. If this were the case, it would severely weaken the argument.
A This choice is outside the scope of the argument: the argument is about Suriland’s wheat farmers increasing how much money that can receive per bushel, not about how these farmers’ costs compare to the costs of farmers in other countries. In any case, this claim does not indicate that Suriland’s wheat farmers could make a dollar more, minus any additional transportation and brokerage costs, than they do now.
B Correct. An increase in supply on the world market with no increased demand could easily depress the price of wheat on the market. It is still possible that Suriland’s farmers would make more than they do now, even after subtracting additional transportation and brokerage costs. But the argument specifically says that the farmers would make a dollar more, minus those costs, and that does not follow if the claim made in this answer choice is true.
C Note that the argument suggests that these farmers would make a dollar per bushel more, less any additional transportation and brokerage costs they would have to pay. That could still be true no matter what those costs are.
D Whether Suriland’s wheat is sold to near or distant countries is immaterial to the argument; note that the conclusion includes the qualification less any additional transportation costs.
E This indicates that Suriland wheat farmers might sometimes lose money on their wheat if selling on the world market. This does not indicate, however, that they would not lose less on the world wheat market than they would selling to the government. Note that the government’s price for wheat is pegged to the world market, so the price the world market offers and the price the government offers will always differ by the exact same amount: the government pays one dollar less.
The correct answer is B.
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/mNdYFFFM
本试题收录于:
GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0
GMAT VERBAL
GMAT
相关试题推荐
WhenMr.Blackretired,hisson______thebusiness.
AstheNationalParkServicecelebratesits100thanniversary(周年纪念),PresidentBarackObamahasannouncedtheestablishmentof
Scientistssaidtheyhavefoundevidenceofagiantplanetfaroutinoursolarsystem.Inastatement,theCaliforniaInstitute
Overtheyears,collegestudentshavestoodtogetherforwhattheybelievein,fromcivilrightstoanti-warpoliciestothemor
Itwasnotmuchfuntotravelononeoftheoldsailingships.Lifewashardforbothpassengersandcrew.17thcenturysailing
Afterthenewsystemhassettleddown,peopleinnon-computerjobsarenotalwaysreplacedwhentheyleave,resultinginadecre
Thankstothemeansofmoderntransportationandcommunication,theworldisgettingsmaller.Thewholeworldcommunityappears
WashingtonIrvingwasAmerica’sfirstmanofletterstobeknowninternationally.Hisworkswerereceivedenthusiasticallyboth
Caraccidentskillmorethanonemillionpeopleandinjureapproximately50millioneachyear.【C1】______,millionsoffishcans
Truefriendshipislikehealth,______isseldomknowntillitislost.
随机试题
我国海拔最高、面积最大的自然保护区是()。
公共关系工作的生命线是()
下列不属于社会公德的主要内容是()
随着网络化和信息化进程的加快,产品策略中信息因素所占的比重逐渐增大,具体表现为()。
国防科学技术研究的重要项目、成果属于()。
前馈控制是指通过观察情况、收集整理信息、掌握规律、预测趋势,正确预汁未来可能出现的问题,提前采取措施,将可能发生的偏差消除在萌芽状态中,避免在未来不同发展阶段可能出现的问题而事先采取的措施。根据上述定义,下列不属于前馈控制的是()。
民族主义、民权主义、民生主义被称为三民主义,从历史的角度看,三民主义的局限性主要有()。
某国有公司总经理李某涉嫌行贿,被A市某区人民检察院提起公诉,A市某区人民法院依法进行了审理。法院认为,李某犯行贿罪,行贿金额300万元,情节严重,依照《刑法》第390条的规定,应判处有期徒刑7年。李某案发后,主动举报某局局长贪污的犯罪事实,有立功情节,可以
Tilegovernmentmustencouragetile______(establish)ofnewindustry.
Lazinessisasin,everyoneknowsthat.Wehaveprobablyallhadlecturespointingoutthatlazinessis【B1】______,thatitisw
最新回复
(
0
)