首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two undergrads are playing a Monopoly game that one of t
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two undergrads are playing a Monopoly game that one of t
admin
2015-06-14
42
问题
In a windowless room on the University of California, Berkeley, campus, two undergrads are playing a Monopoly game that one of them has no chance of winning. A team of psychologists has rigged it so that skill, brains, savvy, and luck—those ingredients that ineffably combine to create success in games as in life—have been made immaterial. Here, the only thing that matters is money.
One of the players, a brown-haired guy in a striped T-shirt, has been made "rich." He got $2,000 from the Monopoly bank at the start of the game and receives $200 each time he passes Go. The second player, a chubby young man in glasses, is comparatively impoverished. He was given $1,000 at the start and collects $100 for passing Go. T-Shirt can roll two dice, but Glasses can only roll one, limiting how fast he can advance. The students play for fifteen minutes under the watchful eye of two video cameras, while down the hall in another windowless room, the researchers huddle around a computer screen, later recording in a giant spreadsheet the subjects’ every facial twitch and hand gesture.
T-Shirt isn’t just winning: he’s crushing Glasses. Initially, he reacted to the inequality between him and his opponent with a series of smirks, an acknowledgment, perhaps, of the inherent awkwardness of the situation. "Hey," his expression seemed to say, "this is weird and unfair, but whatever." Soon, though, as he whizzes around the board, purchasing properties and collecting rent, whatever discomfort he feels seems to dissipate. Hes a skinny kid, but he balloons in size, spreading his limbs toward the jar ends of the table. He smacks his playing piece(in the experiment, the wealthy player gets the Rolls-Royce)as he makes the circuit—smack, smack, smack ending his turns with a board-shuddering bang! Four minutes in, he picks up Glasses’s piece, the little elf shoe, and moves it for him. As the game nears its finish, T-Shirt moves his Rolls faster. The taunting is over now: He’s all efficiency. He refuses to meet Glasses’s gaze. His expression is stone cold as he takes the loser’s cash.
For a long time, primatologists have known that chimpanzees will act out social dominance with a special ferociousness, slapping hands, stamping feet, or "charging back and forth and dragging huge branches," as Jane Goodall once wrote. And sociologists and anthropologists have explored the effects of hierarchy in tribes and groups. But psychology has only recently begun seriously investigating how having money, that major marker of status in the modern world, affects psychosocial behavior in the species Homo sapiens. By making real people temporarily very affluent, without regard to their actual economic circumstances and within the controlled environment of a psych lab, the Berkeley researchers aim to demonstrate the potency of that one variable. "Putting someone in a role where they’re more privileged and have more power in a game makes them behave like people who actually do have more power, more money, and more status," says Paul Piff, the psychologist who designed the experiment. The Monopoly results, based on a year of watching inequitable games between pairs like Glasses and T-Shirt, have not yet been released. But Piff believes that they will support and amplify his previous provocative research.
Earlier this year, Piff, who is 30, published a paper in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences that made him semi-famous. Titled "Higher Social Class Predicts Increased Unethical Behavior," it showed through quizzes, online games, questionnaires, in-lab manipulations, and field studies that living high on the socioeconomic ladder can, colloquially speaking, dehumanize people. It can make them less ethical, more selfish, more insular, and less compassionate than other people. It can make them more likely, as Piff demonstrated in one of his experiments, to take candy from a bowl of sweets designated for children. "While having money doesn’t necessarily make anybody anything," Piff says, "the rich are way more likely to prioritize their own self-interests above the interests of other people. It makes them more likely to exhibit characteristics that we would stereotypically associate with, say, assholes. "
These findings, in combination with a researcher eager to promote them, reverberated online. On message boards, detractors accused Piff of using his lab to promote a leftist agenda: that his home base was Berkeley only fueled those suspicions. Piff s e-mail box filled with messages calling him a "liberal idiot" and his work "junk science." "I would wager," says Wharton business-school psychologist Philip Tetlock, "that a congressional committee chair who favors redistribution of wealth would be far more likely to call these experts in as witnesses than would a committee chair who opposes redistribution."
It is easy to see Piff’s research as ideologically motivated. The point is to "shed light on some of the consequences of social class," he says. But whatever his goal is, the "results are apolitical," he says, and the data point in a clear direction. "Would I be less excited if we found that higher-status people were more generous?" he asks. "I’d probably be less excited, but that’s not what we found."
What can we imply from the words of psychologist Philip Tetlock?
选项
A、People of different standpoint have disagreed opinions on the Berkley research.
B、These experts of Berkley research are witnesses of redistribution of social wealth.
C、The Berkley research elicits a fierce debate among the congressional committee.
D、The committee chair who opposes redistribution will never call the experts.
答案
A
解析
语义题。由题干定位至倒数第二段。整段讲的是人们对Berkeley researchers的研究发现的评论。有些人“eager to promote them”,也有人把此研究叫做“junk science”,Philip Tetlock的话再次说明不同的人会对此研究结论有不同的看法,故选[A]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/llYYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
A、bealongonewithallpossibleinformationabouttheapplicantB、beabriefonewiththepurposeofwritingmadeclearC、bea
Note-takingSkillsNote-takingrequiresahighlevelofabilityinmanyskills,particularlyinthefollowingfourmostimport
Cultureshockisapainfulexperiencewegothroughwhenweencountermanynewthingsinanothercountryandwe【1】______insom
PersonalSocialServicesintheUKassistthefollowingpeopleEXCEPT
Thebrain’sneurologicalspecializationforlanguageiscalledlinguistic______,whichisspecifictohumanbeings.
Revisionisrethinking,buttwomisconceptionsarebynomeansuncommonamongwriters,especiallyamongdevelopingwriters.Firs
Aco-educationalschoolofferschildrennothinglessthanatrueversionofsocietyinminiature.Boysandgirlsaregiventhe
人生是由“渐”维持的。这在女人恐怕尤为必要:歌剧中,舞台上如花的少女,就是将来火炉旁边的老婆子,这句话骤听使人不能相信,少女也不肯承认,实则现在的老婆予都是由如花的少女“渐渐”变成的。人之能堪受境遇的变衰,也伞靠这“渐”的助力。巨富的纨绔子弟固屡次
中华民族的传统文化博大精深、源远流长。早在2000多年前,就产生了以孔孟为代表的儒家学说和以老庄为代表的道家学说,以及其他许多在中国思想史上有地位的学说流派,这就是有名的“诸子百家”。从孔夫子到孙中山,中华名族传统文化有它的许多珍贵品质,许多人民性和民主性
随机试题
为了确保工程质量目标的实现,必须合理选择和正确使用施工机械设备,因为施工机械设备()。
患儿,9个月。腹泻、呕吐3天,大便10余次每天,水样便,伴呕吐5~6次每天,12小时无尿。入院查体:精神萎靡,呼吸深大,眼窝、前囟明显凹陷,皮肤弹性差,四肢凉,体温38℃,血钠123mmol/L,CO2CP10.6mmol/L。该患儿的医疗诊断是
肿瘤致病的内在因素应除外()
矿井安全供电规定的内容有()。
会计人员在处理涉及各方利益的会计事务时,应做到尊重事实,不为他人所左右,不因个人好恶而取舍,一碗水端平,这是()会计职业道德的要求。
下列属于经常转移的项目有()。
多数专家认为:设置安全生产专职岗位确实能降低煤矿的事故发生率。但事实上设置安全生产专职岗位的煤矿和那些没有设置安全生产专职岗位的煤矿相比,事故发生率差不多。以下哪项陈述对解释这种不一致最有帮助?
自从《行政诉讼法》颁布以来,“民告官”的案件成为社会关注的热点。人们普遍担心的是,“官官相护”会成为公正审理此类案件的障碍。但据H省本年度的调查显示,凡正式立案审理的“民告官”案件,65%都是以原告胜诉结案。这说明,H省的法院在审理“民告官”的案件中,并没
设实对称要使得A的正,负惯性指数分别为2,1,则a满足的条件是_________________________。
(1)WhenKellyDilworthappliedforaDiscovercardinJuly,shewashappytolearnthatherspendinglimitwas$13000—alevelm
最新回复
(
0
)