2. 考研
  3. The Nobel Prize is a mysterious incarnation of power and authority, an anointed ritual whose claims are accepted as part of the

The Nobel Prize is a mysterious incarnation of power and authority, an anointed ritual whose claims are accepted as part of the

admin2015-04-10  44
问题     The Nobel Prize is a mysterious incarnation of power and authority, an anointed ritual whose claims are accepted as part of the order of things. The Nobel Prize is at once a relic of the past and a self-admiring mirror of our democratized, scientized, secularized modern culture. After a century of existence, the Nobel has become a problematic part of modern history: it helps shape our perception of ourselves for better or worse.
    Like monarchy, the Nobel Prize surrounds itself with mystery and extraordinary secretiveness. Indeed, the media have more easily breached the privacy of the British royal family than that of the Nobel institution. The prizes present themselves as if handed down from eternity. But as even a cursory inspection will reveal, the juries that pick the laureates have often shown bias, lapses of judgment and bitter infighting. In the sciences, a number of quarrels, scandals, and even lawsuits have erupted over claims to priority or credit for collaborations honored by Nobles. And while widely admired, the science prizes have also been charged with swaying research goals and funding, however inadvertently, and more insidiously with corrupting scientific ambitions by the lure of Nobel fames. Such controversies, together with public dissent from several prizes, have been part of the Nobel history since its beginning. All prizes stir arguments; the Nobel’s fame simply magnifies this hugely.
    The very glory and stature of the Nobel Prizes prompt some sharp questions. Should such high endeavors of the human spirit as science, literature, and peace be treated as competitions, however exalted? Should these priceless efforts be paid the enormous, though "honorary," price lavished on the winners? Would it matter if there never had been a Nobel Price? Or if it vanished tomorrow? The problem is that the prices are not merely awards and medals but are aspects of power woven into our lives: it was once and future Nobelists who built the nuclear bombs that still hang fatefully over us; Nobelists now play an important part in public and military policy.
    It is also true that the Nobel Prizes show modern fame: the Nobel Prize pays honor to some of the highest human adventures in nature and matter, creativity and justice. Where else, moreover, can both the unfamed and the general public find a replacement for the authority and coherence, to whatever degree, the Nobel has come to possess? In a world and age as inwardly fractured as ours this is a question not lightly dismissed.
The author’s attitude towards Nobel Prize is
选项 A、critical.
B、negative.
C、ambiguous.
D、objective.
答案D
解析 作者对诺贝尔奖的态度是[A]批评的。[B]否定的。[C]模棱两可的。[D]客观的。文章大部分篇幅都在讲诺贝尔奖存在的问题，考生很容易选择干扰项[A]。实际上，作者在文中最后一段的态度很明确，诺贝尔奖固然存在一些问题，但是它还是有存在的理由，所以作者的态度是客观的，故选[D]。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/lBFRFFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)