首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish govern
admin
2019-03-10
19
问题
Enviably healthy Denmark is leading the way in taxing unhealthy food. Why are they doing it, and will it work? The Danish government’s now infamous, since "fat tax" has caused an international uproar. It’s praised by public health advocates on the one hand and dismissed on the other as a nanny state whose social engineering has gone violent.
I see it as one country’s attempt to stave off rising obesity (肥胖症) rates, when other options seem less feasible. But the policies appear confusing. Why Denmark of all places? Why particular foods? Will such taxes really change eating behaviour? And aren’t there better ways to halt or reverse rising rates of diet-related chronic (慢性的) diseases?
Before getting to these questions, let’s look at what Denmark has done. In 2009, its government announced a major tax overhaul aimed at softening the shock of the global economic crisis, promoting renewable energy, protecting the environment, discouraging climate change, and improving health—all while maintaining revenues, of course. The tax reforms make it more expensive to produce products likely to harm the environment and to consume products potentially harmful to health, specifically tobacco, ice cream, chocolate, candy, sugar-sweetened soft drinks, and foods containing lots of fats.
Taxes pay for this through policies that maintain a relatively narrow gap between the incomes of the rich and the poor. Because its level of income disparity (差异) is relatively low, the effects of health taxes are less hard on the poor than in many other countries. But the Danes want their health to be better. Life expectancy in Denmark is 79 years, at least two years below that in Japan or Iceland. The stated goal of the tax policies is to increase life expectancy as well as to reduce the burden and cost of illness from diet-related diseases.
In the author’s opinion, what is the purpose of Denmark’s exerting "fat tax"?
选项
A、To attract public advocates.
B、To set up a nanny state.
C、To stave off rising obesity rates.
D、To change medical conditions.
答案
C
解析
根据题干中的"fat tax"定位到第一段第三句。本句到本段末句指出目前丹麦政府因征收“脂肪税”而变得臭名昭著,并已经引起国际骚动,毁誉参半。第二段首句则指出作者认为它是一个国家想降低日益增长的肥胖率的尝试。it指上一段提出的“脂肪税”,因此C)最合理。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ktcMFFFM
本试题收录于:
浙江省大学英语三级题库大学英语三级分类
0
浙江省大学英语三级
大学英语三级
相关试题推荐
Marijuana(大麻)isagreen,brown,orgraymixtureofdried,shreddedleaves,stems,seeds,andflowersofthehempplant(Cannab
WhodoInternationalmedicalguidelinescallfortouseacombinationofAIDSdrugs?
Giventhechoicebetweenspendinganeveningwithfriendsandtakingextratimeforhisschoolwork,AndyKliseadmitshewouldp
Paperisdifferentfromotherwasteproducebecauseitcomesfromasustainableresource:trees.Unlikethemineralsandoiluse
TheBritishpoliticalsceneisdominatedbytwomajorpartiesthathavequitedifferentpoliticalagendas.However,theideologi
WhenChristopherColumbusreachedAmerica,hethoughthearrivedin【D1】______.ThepopulationofNativeAmericansintheUS:【D2】
Asallthemembersofmyfamilylikecountrylife,wedecidedto______farming.
______theInternetisshorteningthedistancebetweenpeople,itmayalsobebreakinghomesorwillcauseotherfamilyproblems.
随机试题
A.急性中毒B.机体免疫力下降C.儿童佝偻病的发生增加D.变态反应E.致癌作用大气污染对健康的直接损害,除外
痞满是一种什么病?如何鉴别实痞与虚痞(请从病因、病机、主症与饮食关系、伴随症状与舌脉四个方面进行鉴别)?
因房地产经纪人员或其所在房地产经纪机构的故意或过失,给当事人造成损失的,则赔偿责任()。[2010年考试真题]
明洞工程中,当边坡能暂时稳定时,可采用()施工。
一个总体()。
下列关于监事会的说法,不正确的是()。
事业单位的事业收入是指事业单位开展专业业务活动及其辅助活动取得的收入。()
注册会计师首次接受委托对被审计单位财务报表进行审计时,下列说法中,正确的是()。
选出没有语病的一句。( )
已知二叉树后序遍历序列是CDABE,中序遍历序列是CADEB,它的前序遍历序列是()。
最新回复
(
0
)