New scientific studies reveal the hidden costs of multitasking as technology increasingly tempts people to do more than one thin

admin2015-04-10  48

问题     New scientific studies reveal the hidden costs of multitasking as technology increasingly tempts people to do more than one thing at a time. Whether people toggle between browsing the Web and using other computer programs, talk on cell phones while driving, pilot jumbo jets or monitor air traffic, they’re using their "executive control" processes—the mental CEO—found to be associated with the brain’s key neural regions. These interrelated cognitive processes establish priorities among tasks and allocate the mind’s resources to them. " For each aspect of human performance—perceiving, thinking and acting—people have specific mental resources whose effective use requires supervision through executive mental control," says David Meyer, Ph. D. at the University of Michigan.
    To better understand executive control, as well as the human capacity for multitasking and its limitations, Joshua Rubinstein, Ph. D. of U. S. Federal Aviation Administration, and David Meyer, and Jeffrey Evans, Ph. D. at the University of Michigan, studied patterns in the amounts of time lost when people switched repeatedly between two tasks of varying complexity and familiarity. The findings revealed that for all types of tasks, subjects lost time when they had to switch from one task to another, and time costs increased with the complexity of the tasks, so it took a significantly long time to switch between more complex tasks. Time costs were a lot greater when subjects switched to tasks that were relatively unfamiliar. They got "up to speed" faster when they switched to tasks they knew better, an observation that may lead to interfaces designed to help overcome people’s innate cognitive limitations.
    The researchers say their results suggest that executive control involves two distinct, complementary stages: goal shifting("I want to do this now instead of that")and rule activation("I’m turning off the rules for that and turning on the rules for this"). Both stages help people unconsciously switch between tasks. Rule activation itself takes significant amounts of time, several tenths of a second—which can add up when people switch back and forth repeatedly between tasks. Thus, multitasking may seem more efficient on the surface, but may actually take more time in the end. According to the researchers, this insight into executive control may help people choose strategies that maximize their efficiency when multitasking. The insight may also weigh against multitasking. For example, Meyer points out, a mere half second of time lost to task switching can mean the difference between life and death for a driver using a cell phone, because during the time that the car is not totally under control, it can travel far enough to crash into obstacles the driver have otherwise avoided.
The example about the driver in the third paragraph is used to illustrate that

选项 A、car drivers should not drive so fast while using a cell phone.
B、car drivers should shift his goals consciously to avoid the accidents.
C、multitasking is not as efficient as people have expected and may take more time.
D、multitasking should be avoided in some cases for the sake of safety.

答案D

解析 第三段中司机的例子是用来说明[A]汽车司机不应当在使用手机时开太快。[B]汽车司机应当有意识地转换目标以避免发生事故。[C]处理多种任务并不像人们料想的那样有效率,而且可能会花更多的时间。[D]在有些情况下,为了安全起见应该避免同时处理多个任务。文章第三段倒数第二句指出,对于执行控制的理解可能会反对人们同时处理多种任务。梅尔指出,人们在转换任务时仅仅损失的半秒钟,对一个使用手机的司机来说,有可能就意味着生与死的差别。因此,本题的正确答案为[D],即该例是为了说明在有些情况下,为了安全起见应该避免同时处理多个任务。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/kBFRFFFM
0

最新回复(0)