首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds A) Broad demographic (人口的) shifts in marital
Living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds A) Broad demographic (人口的) shifts in marital
admin
2019-08-19
27
问题
Living with parents edges out other living arrangements for 18- to 34-year-olds
A) Broad demographic (人口的) shifts in marital status, educational attainment and employment have transformed the way young adults in the U. S. are living, and a new Pew Research Center analysis highlights the implications of these changes for the most basic element of their lives— where they call home. In 2014, for the first time in more than 130 years, adults ages 18 to 34 were slightly more likely to be living in their parents’ home than they were to be living with a spouse or partner in their own household.
B) This turn of events is fueled primarily by the dramatic drop in the share of young Americans who are choosing to settle down romantically before age 35. Dating back to 1880, the most common living arrangement among young adults has been living with a romantic partner, whether a spouse or a significant other. This type of arrangement peaked around 1960, when 62% of the nation’s 18- to 34-year-olds were living with a spouse or partner in their own household, and only one-in-flve were living with their parents.
C) By 2014, 31.6% of young adults were living with a spouse or partner in their own household, below the share living in the home of their parent(s) (32.1%). Some 14% of young adults lived alone, were a single parent or lived with one or more roommates. The remaining 22% lived in the home of another family member (such as a grandparent, in-law or sibling (兄弟姐妹), a non-relative , or in group quarters like college dormitories.
D) It’s worth noting that the overall share of young adults living with their parents was not at a record high in 2014. This arrangement peaked around 1940, when about 35% of the nation’s 18- to 34-year-olds lived with mom and/or dad (compared with 32% in 2014). What has changed, instead, is the relative share adopting different ways of living in early adulthood, with the decline of romantic coupling pushing living at home to the top of a much less uniform list of living arrangements.
E) Among young adults, living arrangements differ significantly by gender. For men aged 18 to 34, living at home with mom and/or dad has been the dominant living arrangement since 2009. In 2014, 28% of young men were living with a spouse or partner in their own home, while 35% were living in the home of their parent(s). Young women, however, are still more likely to be living with a spouse or romantic partner (35%) than they are to be living with their parent (s) (29%).
F) In 2014, more young women (16%) than young men (13%) were heading up a household without a spouse or partner. This is mainly because women are more likely than men to be single parents living with their children. For their part, young men (25%) are more likely than young women (19%) to be living in the home of another family member, a non-relative or in some type of group quarters.
G) A variety of factors contribute to the long-run increase in the share of young adults living with their parents. The first is the postponement of, if not retreat from, marriage. The average age of first marriage has risen steadily for decades. In addition, a growing share of young adults may be avoiding marriage altogether. A previous Pew Research Center analysis projected that as many as one-in-four of today’s young adults may never marry. While cohabitation (同居) has been on the rise, the overall share of young adults either married or living with an unmarried partner has substantially fallen since 1990.
H) In addition, trends in both employment status and wages have likely contributed to the growing share of young adults who are living in the home of their parent (s), and this is especially true of young men. Employed young men are much less likely to live at home than young men without a job, and employment among young men has fallen significantly in recent decades. The share of young men with jobs peaked around 1960 at 84% . In 2014, only 71% of 18- to 34-year-old men were employed. Similarly with earnings, young men’s wages (after adjusting for inflation) have been on a downward trajectory (轨迹) since 1970 and fell significantly from 2000 to 2010. As wages have fallen, the share of young men living in the home of their parent(s) has risen.
I) Economic factors seem to explain less of why young adult women are increasingly likely to live at home. Generally, young women have had growing success in the paid labor market since 1960 and hence might increasingly be expected to be able to afford to live independently of their parents. For women, delayed marriage—which is related, in part, to labor market outcomes for men—may explain more of the increase in their living in the family home.
J) The Great Recession (and modest recovery) has also been associated with an increase in young adults living at home. Initially in the wake of the recession, college enrollments expanded, boosting the ranks of young adults living at home. And given the weak job opportunities facing young adults, living at home was part of the private safety net helping young adults to weather the economic storm.
K) Beyond gender, young adults’ living arrangements differ considerably by education—which is tied to financial means. For young adults without a bachelor’s degree, as of 2008 living at home with their parents was more prevalent than living with a romantic partner. By 2014, 36% of 18- to 34-year-olds who had not completed a bachelor’s degree were living with their parent(s) while 27% were living with a spouse or partner. Among college graduates, in 2014 46% were married or living with a partner, and only 19% were living with their parents (s). Young adults with a college degree have fared much better in the labor market than their less-educated counterparts, which has in turn made it easier to establish their own households.
Unemployed young men are more likely to live with their parents than the employed.
选项
答案
H
解析
同义转述题。定位句提到,有工作的男性和没有工作的男性相比,不太倾向于在家生活。由此可知,与有工作的男性相比,没有工作的年轻男性更倾向于和父母同住。题干中的unemployed young men are more likely to对应原文中的employed young men are much less likely to,故答案为H)。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ju7FFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
Forcenturies,inthecountriesofsouthandSoutheastAsiatheelephanthasbeenanintimatepartoftheculture,economyandr
TheUSCongressA)TheUScongressisthelegislativebranchofthefederalgovernment.Itisabicameral(两院制的)law-making
TheLostArtofListeningA)"Whywon’theevenlistentomyidea?""WhyamIcutoffbeforeIprovidethewholestory?"How
TheInternetisaninternationalcollectionofcomputernetworksthatallunderstandastandardsystemofaddressesandcommands
Forsomeeducators,thereisnothingwrongwithfunandgames.AgroupcalledtheEducationArcaderecentlyheldaconferencein
InastepthatshouldhelpmaketheInternetsaferforconsumers,anti-virusgiantSymanteconWednesdaywillintroduceaprotec
A、Aninternationaldriver’slicense.B、AnArizonadriver’slicense.C、Aregularlicense.D、Alimitedlicense.A对话开头,男士直接说到他有一张国际
Forthispart,youareallowed30minutestowriteashortessayentitledDoOneThingataTime,AndDoItWellbycommentingo
HowsciencegoeswrongScientificresearchhaschangedtheworld.Nowitneedstochangeitself.[A]Asimpleideaunderlies
蹴鞠(Cuju)是中国古代的一项球类运动。它是竞技运动,要把球踢进球网内。该运动是为了训练士兵而发明的。在汉代(theHanDynasty),从军队到皇室,乃至贵族阶层,蹴鞠都很盛行。由于社会经济的发展,蹴鞠在宋代(theSongDynasty)甚
随机试题
来源于历史事件的成语是()
宜睡前服的药是
根据现行增值税的规定,下列说法正确的是()。
甲、乙、丙三人投资设立了一家普通合伙企业。后甲在向丁借款时,以其在合伙企业中的财产份额出质,合伙人乙和丙得知后表示反对。对此,下列各项中正确的有()。
甲企业为增值税一般纳税人,适用的增值税税率为13%。发出商品成本按月末一次加权平均法计算确定,原材料采用计划成本法核算。2019年12月该企业发生如下经济业务:(1)1日,库存商品结存数量为1000件,单位生产成本为21元;本月生产完工验收入库
根据增值税和消费税法律制度的规定,下列环节既征消费税又征增值税的有()。
9x一4.3x+3=0的解为().
利用图片、图表、模型、幻灯片、电影、电视等手段进行教学的直观类型是()。
看待社会公正问题.应防止落入平均主义这种无论在历史上还是在现实中都颇具诱惑力的窠臼中。虽然平均主义在某些领域是适用的,但若将其推广到所有领域尤其是分配领域,否认人的差别而要求平均分享一切,最终只会扼制人的积极性,扼杀社会发展的活力,不利于社会公正的实现。这
ThethousandsofvolcanicislandsandcoralatollsoftheSouthSeashaveatotalpopulationofaboutfourmillion,butthepauc
最新回复
(
0
)