首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
Farewell, Libraries? Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of
admin
2012-07-05
43
问题
Farewell, Libraries?
Amazon, corn’s recent announcement that sales of e-books at the online megastore had overtaken sales of hardcover books came as no surprise. It had to happen sometime. But the news did conjure quite an interesting mental image: libraries that from now on will look smaller and less crowded.
For the moment, let’s not argue with the proposition that people will read as much as they ever have, no matter whether they read an actual book or a book on a screen. The habits of readers may not change (if anything, people may read more, or at least buy more— several stories have quoted e-book owners who say they buy more titles for their e-readers than they did when they were buying hardcover books). But if readers aren’t changing, their environments will. Rooms that once held books will—well, whatever they hold from now on, it won’t be books, or not as many books. Theoretically, your space will be more spare, more serenely uncluttered. That’s the theory, at least. My experience is that stuff expands to fill the space available. But you can dream.
All of this has already happened big time in the music business, where downloads have gradually but surely replaced CDs. I don’t know how many people I’ve overheard crowing because they managed to transfer their entire music collections onto their computers. All those CDs taking up space on the wall have gone—All those CDs that travel from car to kitchen to bedroom to living room, with the CD and the case getting separated somewhere along the way—a problem no more in the digital age. From now on, we’ll own what might be described as the idea of stuff, since the actual physical things—records, tapes, photographs, CDs, and now books—have been as good as vaporized, with the information contained therein stored away on a hard drive.
This, of course, is merely collateral (并行的) damage in the digital revolution, if damage it is. There’s as yet no way to tell if this transition is good, bad, both, or neither, but surely the absence of a physical library, be it musical or literary, marks a fundamental shift in the way we live and think about things. In music, for example, the rise of iTunes, Pandora, YouTube, and all the other online music players has quickly eroded our devotion to the long-playing album as the principal means of organizing music. After a half century of neglect, the lowly single is back on top. Most immediately this has consequences for artists, maybe not so much for the people who buy their music. But who knows?
With books, the absence of packaging does nothing to the contents. I can buy a hardcover copy of Moby-Dick or download it onto an e-reader, and Melville is still Melville. But I grew up loving Rockwell Kent’s illustrations of that novel, and later Barry Moser’s. It’s hard to think of the book without them. I can do that, certainly, but some little thing is lost.
Paperbacks and public libraries made books cheap or free but certainly available to millions who might otherwise not have been able to afford them, and all that happened long before I was born. Nevertheless, I was brought up by people who had been taught—and who taught me—that books were valuable things, things to be cared for and cherished, and I have owned some volumes for close to half a century (almost none of them, I should point out, qualify as "collectible" or valuable to an antiquarian book collector; owning a rare book makes me nervous. I like books I can hold, read, and even—here my mother is spinning in her grave— write in).
I come from a generation for whom the books and records on the shelf signaled, in some way, who you were (starting with the fact that you were a person who owned books or records or CDs). If you visited a friend, you took the first chance you had to secretly scan that friend’s shelves to get a handle on the person. I suppose I could sneak a peek at a friend’s Kindle, but is that the same? And try that kind of snooping on a bus or in a coffee shop and you’ll probably get arrested.
The stuff of our lives is a comfort. We look up at the shelves and we see old friends. Yes, there are books on my shelves that aren’t my friends, that I haven’t finished or even started, but someday I will, I promise—my home library is a physical manifestation of ambivalence. There is comfort in the continuity of seeing the same books year after year. I guess there might be some of the same pleasure in scrolling through a digital library or music play list, but somehow I think something will be lost.
For years audiophiles (音响爱好者) have tried to persuade more casual music fans that a vinyl record played on a decent sound system sounds better than a digital recording played on the same system. Digital sound is not as warm, not as seductive to the ear. The resurgence, albeit modest, of vinyl, especially among young listeners and musicians, proves that this argument is not generational. It’s not, in other words, just old fogies versus young hipsters.
Something of the same argument might be made for books, or for the tactile (触觉的) pleasure of holding and reading a well-made book. At its simplest, a book is a tool, or an information-delivery system, if you will, and it does what it does supremely well. To conceive of a world without physical books is to conceive of a world somehow diminished. It may be more efficient—yes, you can take a "stack" of books on vacation with an e-reader. It may spare quite a few forests from the ax. But efficiency is no substitute for pleasure. The future may be less cluttered. It may also be less fun.
What will be the result of the digital revolution if there isn’t a physical library?
选项
A、Our lifestyle and way of thinking will be changed.
B、There will be more bad consequences than good ones.
C、The life of both artists and buyers will be damaged.
D、More online bookstores will appear.
答案
A
解析
同义转述题。定位句表明,虽然无法确定电子革命是好是坏,但是实体图书馆的缺失一定会使我们的生活和思维方式发生根本性变化。由此可知答案为A)“我们的生活和思维方式将会发生变化”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jecFFFFM
0
大学英语四级
相关试题推荐
A、Playingawordgame.B、Arguingwitheachother.C、Whisperingtoeachother.D、Talkingabouttheirfamilies.A细节题。根据短文中的because
Mostpeoplehavenoideaofthehardworkandworryaboutgoingintocollectionofthosefascinatingbirdsandanimalsthatthey
AmericansandFoodAnunusualbuttimelycartoonrecentlyappearedinthelocalnewspaper.Thesinglepanelshowedagravel-
A、Thattherewasnoeffect.B、Thatitimprovedoperations.C、Thatoperationsbecamelessefficient.D、Thattheemployeesbecame
Howoldis"old"?Theanswerhaschangedovertheyears.Twohundredyearsago,youwereoldat35.Thatwastheaveragelifeex
Therearemany【B1】______aboutthebeginningofdramainancientGreece.Theonemostwidelyacceptedtodayisbasedontheassum
FromTaiwantoAlgeria,thousandsofforeigners【S1】______toU.S.universitiestostudy.Thosewhocomepraisethelibrariesand
AthleteswithadifferentkindandlevelofdisabilityarecompetingattheParalympicGames.Whereassomesportsare【S1】______t
Sinceabout1800,nearthebeginningoftheindustrialrevolution,coal,petroleumandgashavebeenusedatarapidlyincreasin
FlagDay,June14,isthebirthdayofAmericanflag.Onthisdatein1777,theContinentalCongress【C1】______aresolutionstatin
随机试题
设fp为指向某二进制文件末尾的指针,则函数feof(fp)的返回值为()。
在敷设补偿导线作为热电偶引线时,若遇有电力线,两者应平行走线,避免交叉。
简述人的行为的基本特征。
孕妇,30岁。妊娠32+3周,2周内阴道少量出血2次,今晨突然阴道出血多于月经量,无腹痛,血压126/84mmHg,心率94次/分,宫高3lcm,腹围86cm,臀先露,未入盆,胎心音清晰,142次/分。确诊首选的辅助检查
对未来现金流量以恰当的折现率进行折现后的价值应称()。
设A为三阶矩阵,,则|4A一(3A*)—1|=()
Itisnotthatthescalesintheonecase,andthebalanceintheother,differintheprinciplesoftheirconstructionormanne
用Excel2000按下列要求建立数据表格和图表,将文档保存在考生文件夹下,名为EX01.xls。具体要求如下。(1)请将下列数据建成一个数据表(存放在A1:E5的区域内),并求出个人工资的浮动额以及原来工资和浮动额的“总计”(保留小数点后面1
Justsevenyearsago,theJarvik-7artificialheartwasbeingcheeredasthemodelofhumancreativeness.ThesightofBarneyCl
Inthispartofthesection,youwillhear1conversationand2lectures.Youmustanswereachquestion.Afteryouanswer,c
最新回复
(
0
)