首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
34
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
What do you think ordinary citizens may do after reading the different arguments?
选项
A、They are indifferent.
B、They are very worried.
C、The may exercise prudent avoidance.
D、They are shocked.
答案
C
解析
推理判断题。第一段第四句指出,电磁场与疾病有关的暗示让人不安,因为我们每个人都与这种磁场存在联系,比如使用电器、电线、天线、电脑和微波炉都会产生磁场。由此可推断,普通人在读了这篇文章后,可能会担心自己所使用的电器会导致疾病,从而会注意减少对电器的使用,故答案为[C]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jUwUFFFM
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
西方列强
consumergoods
Urgentactionisneededincountriesimpactedbyfragility,conflictandviolence(FCV)toendextremepovertyglobally,accordi
Mencannotmanufacturebloodasefficientlyaswomencan.Thismakessurgeryriskierformen.Menalsoneedmoreoxygenbecause
Ironically,theproperuseoffigurativelanguagemustbebasedonthedenotativemeaningofthewords,becauseitisthefailur
AliquidAthatmightbeapoorconductorBwhenpureisoftenCusedtomakesolutionsthatDtransmitselectricity.
AlthougheconomictiesbetweenmostAsia-Pacificeconomieshavenotyetsufferedanyfundamentaldamage.
We______theletteryesterday,butitdidn’tarrive.
Foreachquestionbelow,choosetheanswerthatbestcompletesthesentence.ThenwritethecorrespondingletterontheAnswerS
Asadefenseagainstair-pollutiondamage,manyplantsandanimals______asubstancetoabsorbharmfulchemicals.
随机试题
下列损伤按因素分类,错误的是()
感冒患者,恶寒发热轻微,但以脘腹冷痛、呕吐、腹泻为主症,舌苔薄,脉紧。其病机是
张三、李四、王五、赵六、周七五人为研究生同学,2010年7月份研究生毕业时,五人商议欲创立一家经营法律类图书的英杰有限责任公司。五人订立了设立公司的协议,约定张三以2010年6月份依据遗嘱继承的其祖父所留给他的临街的一处二层商业房作为出资;李四以货币10万
已知某双原子分子气体,如图作ABC循环,其中曲线AC为等温线,A点压强为pA=4.15×105Pa,体积VA=2.0×10-2m3,B点体积VB=3.0×10-2m3,则在ABC循环过程中气体所做的净功W,吸收的热量Q,以及循环效率η分别为()。
有线电视信号传输系统采用明线安装时对电缆的防雷主要采取的措施有()。
【背景资料】某河道整治工程的主要施工内容有河道疏浚、原堤防加固、新堤防填筑等。承包人依据《水利水电工程标准施工招标文件》(2009年版)与发包人签订了施工合同,合同约定工期为9个月(每月按30天计算,下同),2015年10月1日开工。承包人编制并经监理人
从一批产品中随机抽取若干件进行质量检验,并计算合格率,然后以此推断全部产品的合格率。此种调查属于( )。
总体与总体单位,标志与指标的划分都具有相对性。()
根据我国宪法规定,下列说法不正确的是()。
截至2010年5月底,北京市朝阳区规模以上文化创意产业单位共有1777家,总资产达到1534.6亿元,同比增长19.6%;1-5月累计实现收入521.6亿元,同比增长20.4%;从业人员平均人数为16.4万人,同比增长0.8%;单位数量,资产总计,收入合计
最新回复
(
0
)