首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
Whose Grave is This Anyway? There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for t
admin
2013-08-12
28
问题
Whose Grave is This Anyway?
There are many legends about the world famous Egyptian Pharaohs’ tombs, which have lain silent for thousands of years along the Nero River. In reality though, this silence has constantly been disturbed by a great variety of people. While considering their different motivations in doing so, we must examine whether disturbing the ancient tombs is justifiable or worthy of condemnation.
(A)
hen Howard Carter and his party opened the tomb of the Egyptian king Tutankhamen in 1922, there was rejoicing around the world.(B)
he tomb was largely intact and not seriously pillaged by ancient grave robbers, so it still contained the wonderful artifacts that had been buried with the young king more than three millennia earlier.(C)
Over the next several years Carter and his team systematically photographed and catalogued the objects from the tomb, then transported them to the Cairo Museum.(D)
There is a certain irony in this story that raises complex ethical questions. Why are Carter and his
party
not called grave robbers? Why are their actions in stripping the tomb acceptable—even praiseworthy—when similar behavior by common thieves would be deplored? No matter who opens a tomb and takes away its contents, that person is violating the intentions of
those
who sealed the tomb originally. No matter what the motivation, a human body that was meant to rest in peace for all time has been disturbed. Should this not make us feel uncomfortable?
From the beginning, some were uneasy about the propriety of unearthing Tutankhamen’s remains. When Lord Carnarvon, Carter’s sponsor, died suddenly from a mosquito bite, and several others connected with the project experienced tragedies, rumors arose about the "curse of King Tut". But Carter himself died peacefully many years later, and the talk subsided.
Perhaps it is the passage of time that transforms grave robbing into archaeology.
Carter would no doubt have been outraged if, say, his grandmother’s coffin had been dug up to strip the body of its jewelry. But after three thousand years Tutankhamen has no living relatives to protest his disturbance.
Perhaps it is a question of the words we use to describe such ancient finds. We speak of Tutankhamen’s "mummy", and mummy is a clean, historical-sounding word. Parents bring their children to museums to see the mummies and mummy cases. We can almost forget that a mummy is the embalmed body of a dead human being, pulled out of its coffin so that we can marvel at the coffin and sometimes the body itself.
Or, perhaps the difference between grave robbing and archaeology lies in the motives of the perpetrators. Common thieves are motivated by greed, by their quest for money to be made by selling stolen objects. Carter and his team did not sell the treasures from Tutankhamen’s tomb but stored them safely in the Cairo Museum, where art lovers from around the world can see them.
They
were, in effect, making a glorious gift to the people of our century and centuries to come(while at the same time, one must point out, acquiring significant glory for themselves).
The basic issue is a
clash
of cultural values. To the Egyptians, it was normal and correct to bury their finest artworks with the exalted dead. To us, the idea of all that beauty being locked away in the dark forever seems an appalling waste. We want to bring it into the light, to have it as part of our precious artistic
heritage
. Almost no one, having seen these magnificent treasures, would seriously propose they be put back in the tomb and sealed up.
In the end, inevitably, our cultural values will prevail simply because we are still here and the ancient Egyptians are not. After three thousand years, Tutankhamen’s grave really isn’t his anymore. Whether right or wrong, it belongs to us.
Which of the following can be inferred from Paragraph 4 about the power of the curse of the Pharaoh’s tomb?
选项
A、It is supported by science.
B、It is a rumor denied by fact.
C、It is still a myth until today.
D、It does punish the disturbing people.
答案
B
解析
本题为推论题。题目问:关于第四段所提到的诅咒的力量,可以作出以下哪一项推论?根据本段,Carter团队中的一些人的意外死亡似乎应验了这一诅咒,但是Carter却在多年以后平静地去世。所以,这证明了谣言并不正确,已经被事实所否定,因此选B项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jOhYFFFM
0
托福(TOEFL)
相关试题推荐
Completethesentencesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.Studentsneedafrontdoorkeybetween【T15】___
Completetheexplanationoftheroomnumber.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.WRITINGPaycarefulattentiontothequestion
Completethenotesbelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.WRITINGPaycarefulattentiontothequestion
WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.WhatTHREEitemsofclothingdoesthespeakerrecommendfortherainforest?
Completethetablebelow.WriteNOMORETHANTHREEWORDSforeachanswer.
Betweenwhattimesistheroadtrafficlightest?
steel本题询问琴弦是用什么材质做出的。录音中指出,这款吉他使用了钢弦(steelstrings),而非传统的羊肠弦(gutones)。录音中的used是题目madeof的同义表述,故空格处填入steel。
"PhysicsClass"Howdoestheprofessorexplaintheclosedstring?
随机试题
易导致皮肤皲裂毛发干枯的邪气是易导致皮肉痈肿疮疡的邪气是
肝硬化病人在进食时应细嚼慢咽,必要时药物应研磨成粉末服用,其目的是()。
在保温设计中评价围护结构保温性能,下列哪一项是主要指标?
中央分隔带纵向盲沟的反滤层材料可选择()。
下列各项中,不会对投资项目内含报酬率指标产生影响的因素是()。
旅游突发事件发生后,重大和特别重大旅游突发事件应逐级向()提交总结报告。
奥苏贝尔根据学习进行的方式把学习分为()
人造骨要求作为原料的金属具有耐热性、韧性和生物相容性等特点。据此,下列材料最适合制作人造骨的是:
通过选择组合框中的选项来改变文本框的字体。在窗体中添加一个组合框(Combo1)和一个文本框(Text1),代码如下。请填入适当的内容,将程序补充完整。PrivateSubCombo1_Cliek()TextFontName=Combo
【S1】【S2】
最新回复
(
0
)