首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
35
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jGnMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
MostChinesepeoplewenttoworkbybikewithinliving______
Doctorsareinterestedinusinglasersasasurgicaltoolinoperationsonpeoplewhoare______toheartattack.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
Sheansweredwithan______"No"totherequestthatsheattendthepublichearing.
His______ingamblinghaseventuallybroughtabouthisruin.
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
随机试题
江苏某工厂、贵州某工厂、东北某工厂、北京某工厂要引进环形灯生产技术,各家的产量不尽相同,北京某进出口公司是其中某一工厂的代理。知道其他三家工厂的计划后,该公司主动联合这三家在北京开会,建议联合对外,统一谈判,这三家工厂觉得有意义,同意联合。该公司代表将四家
日常生活活动能力FIM评定中的依赖日常生活活动能力FIM评定中的有条件独立
动物细胞获得ATP的主要方式是
根据《房屋建筑和市政基础设施工程施工分包管理办法》的规定,对于接受转包、违法分包和利用他人名义承揽工程的单位,处以()的罚款。
避难间位置靠近楼梯间,并采用耐火极限不低于()h的防火隔墙和甲级防火门与其他部位分隔,服务的护理单元不得超过2个。
某设备的账面原价为4000万元,预计使用年限为5年,预计净残值为100万元,采用双倍余额递减法计提折旧。该设备在第2年应计提的折旧额为()万元。
阅读下面的学生习作,完成下列问题。给自己点一盏灯①曾经有这样一个故事:一个盲人在走夜路时总是提着一盏灯,有人好奇地问“您为什么要提灯啊
主张课程内容的组织以儿童活动为中心,提倡“做中学”的课程理论是()。
认为人的发展主要依靠外在的力量,诸如环境的刺激和要求,他人的影响和学校的教育等,持这种观点的教育家是()。
已知矩阵且矩阵X满足AXA+BXB=AXB+BXA+E,其中E是3阶单位阵.求X.
最新回复
(
0
)