首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2016-12-06
39
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. A Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned, that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the US.
B、History of the US railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
本文主要介绍的是美国法院在铁路公司伤害案中的裁决,因此D是最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/jGnMFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Thereoughttobelessanxietyovertheperceivedriskofmountainclimbingthan______inthepublicmindtoday.
Veryfewpeoplecouldunderstandthelecturetheprofessordeliveredbecauseitssubjectwasvery______.
Itisunfortunatethatthemembersofthecommitteedonot______inopinion.
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
VisitorstoBritainmayfindthebestplacetosamplelocalcultureisinatraditionalpub.Butthesefriendlyhostelriescanb
With______exceptions,theformerPresidentdoesnotappearinpublicnow.
Thousandsofpeopleturnedoutintothestreetsto______againstthelocalauthorities’decisiontobuildahighwayacrossthef
Acompanyhaslaunchedrevolutionarysoftwarefortrackingstolenmobilephonesthatisimpossibletoremovefromthedevice—eve
随机试题
肺动脉权
患者,女,37岁,因食欲减退,烦躁不安,注意力不集中,皮肤黏膜苍白就诊,诊断为缺铁性贫血。哪项化验能确诊
A.垂体腺瘤压迫浸润B.产后大出血C.脑垂体卒中D.垂体腺瘤手术治疗后E.创伤性垂体柄损伤引起希恩综合征的是
“中焦如沤”是比喻
下列关于期权内在价值的理解,不正确的是()。
根据《中华人民共和国合同法》的规定,下列各项中,属于不得撤销要约的情形有()。
贷款担保评估主要是对担保方式、担保能力、______和担保法律文件的完善性进行评估。
有限责任公司的主要特征有()。
光荣革命
Excel工作表就是数据清单,数据清单是一种特殊的工作表。
最新回复
(
0
)