Teachers are heroes, not villains, and it’s time to stop demonizing them. It has become fashionable to blame all of society’

admin2016-08-02  29

问题     Teachers are heroes, not villains, and it’s time to stop demonizing them.
    It has become fashionable to blame all of society’s manifold sins and wickedness on "teachers unions," as if it were possible to separate these supposedly evil organizations from the dedicated public servants who belong to them. Collective bargaining is not the problem, and taking that right away from teachers will not fix the schools.
    The fact is that teachers are being saddled with absurdly high expectations. Some studies have shown a correlation between student performance and teacher "effectiveness," depending how this elusive quality is measured, but there is a whole body of academic literature proving the stronger correlation between student performance and a much more important variable: family income. Yes, I’m talking about poverty. Sorry to be so gauche, but when teachers point out the relationship between income and achievement, they’re not shirking responsibility. They’re just stating an inconvenient truth.
    According to figures compiled by the College Board, students from families making more than $200,000 score more than 300 points higher on the SAT, on average, than students from families making less than $20,000 a year. There is, in fact, a clear relationship all the way along the scale; Each increment in higher family income translates into points on the test. Sean Rcardon of Stanford University’s Center for Education Policy Analysis concluded in a recent study that the achievement gap between high-income and low-income students is actually widening. It is unclear why this might be happening; maybe it is due to increased income inequality, maybe the relationship between income and achievement has somehow become stronger, maybe there is some other reason.
    Whatever the cause, our society’s answer seems to be: Beat up the teachers. We tend to believe that most of the teachers in low-income, low-performing schools are incompetent—and, by extension, that most of the teachers in upper-crust schools, where students perform well, are paragons of pedagogical virtue. But some of the most dedicated and talented teachers I’ve ever met were working in "failing" inner-city schools. And yes, in award-winning schools where "all the children are above average", I’ve met some unimaginative hacks who should never be allowed near a classroom.
    It is reasonable to hold teachers accountable for their performance, but it is not reasonable—or, in the end, productive’ to hold them accountable for factors that lie far beyond their control. It is fair to insist that teachers approach their jobs with the assumption that every single child, rich or poor, can succeed. It is not fair to expect teachers to correct all the imbalances and remedy all the pathologies that result from growing inequality in our society. Portraying teachers as villains doesn’t help a single child. Ignoring the reasons for the education gap in this country is no way to close it. And there’s a better way to learn about the crisis than going to the movies. Visit a school instead.
The underlined word "gauche"(Line 4, Paragraph 3)is closest in meaning to______.

选项 A、humble
B、awkward
C、confident
D、arrogant

答案B

解析 本题考查考生对生词意思的理解。“gauche”一词出现在文中第三段第八行。本段一开始作者就指出教师们正承担着本不应该承担的责任和过高的期望,紧接着作者引入了学生学术表现上的差距这一问题,指出造成这一差距的原因不在于老师,而在于家庭收入。在西方社会,不论是正式文章,还是日常闲谈,关于钱的话题总是敏感的,尤其在本文,这里赤裸裸的指出钱是造成教育差距的原因,并且更进一步的用“poverty”(贫穷)一词直抒胸臆,可谓直截了当,气氛有点难堪。B是正确选项。A、B、D均是命题人故意设置的干扰选项。用来迷惑考生,均不正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ivT7FFFM
0

最新回复(0)