首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
51
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/i5xYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Forsometimepastithasbeenwidelyacceptedthatbabies—andothercreatures—learntodothingsbecausecertainactsleadto
Thenewschoolbuildingis______completion.
Duringrecentyearswehaveheardmuchabout"race":howthisracedoescertainthingsandthatracebelievescertainthingsand
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
Onceuponatime,innovationatProcter&Gambleflowedoneway:fromtheUnitedStatesoutward.WhilethelargeCincinnati-base
Thereceptionwasattendedbyvarious______membersofthelocalcommunityandrepresentativesofregionalindustries.
Thisdiplomaisimportant,which______thatyouhavecompletedhighschool.(2006年中国矿业大学考博试题)
Herremarks______acompletedisregardforhumanrights.(2002年清华大学考博试题)
Herhumorousremarksseemed______,butwereinfactcarefullypreparedbeforehand.
______,hewentouttoplayfootballwithhisfriends.
随机试题
下列不属于瘀血痹阻心脉及心的阳气虚衰的表现是
Burgur(伯格)练习的目的是
语言错乱,说后自知,为
目前诊断子宫内膜异位症的最佳方法是
商业银行通过一系列制度、程序和方法,对风险进行()。
不铸造金币,没有金币流通,实际流通的是纸币—银行券;银行券规定含金量,但不能自由兑换黄金,只能在规定的数额以上兑换黄金;黄金集中由政府保管,作为银行券流通的保证。这种金本位制是()。
“天行有常,不为尧存,不为桀亡,应之以治则吉,应之以乱则凶。”提出这一观点的学派是()。
下列不正确的说法有()。
()对于洞察相当于实力对于()
Themainpurposeofannouncingtheaboveeventsistogiveinformationabout.Ifyoudon’twanttomisstheRedbirds,youmust
最新回复
(
0
)