首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that com
admin
2020-03-30
47
问题
A century ago in the United States, when an individual brought suit against a company, public opinion tended to protect that company. But perhaps this phenomenon was most striking in the case of the railroads. Nearly half of all negligence cases decided through 1896 involved railroads. And the railroads usually won.
Most of the cases were decided in state courts, when the railroads had the climate of the times on their sides. Government supported the railroad industry; the progress railroads represented was not to be slowed down by requiring them often to pay damages to those unlucky enough to be hurt working for them.
Court decisions always went against railroad workers. Mr. Farwell, an engineer, lost his right hand when a switchman’s negligence ran his engine off the track. The court reasoned that since Farwell had taken the job of an engineer voluntarily at good pay, he had accepted the risk. Therefore the accident, though avoidable had the switchmen acted carefully, was a "pure accident". In effect a railroad could never be held responsible for injury to one employee caused by the mistake of another.
In one case where a Pennsylvania Railroad worker had started a fire at a warehouse and the fire had spread several blocks, causing widespread damage, a jury found the company responsible for all the damage. But the court overturned the jury’s decision because it argued that the railroad’s negligence was the immediate cause of damage only to the nearest buildings. Beyond them the connection was too remote to consider.
As the century wore on, public sentiment began to turn against the railroads—against their economic and political power and high fares as well as against their callousness(无情)toward individuals.
What does the passage mainly discuss?
选项
A、Railroad oppressing individuals in the U. S.
B、History of the U. S. railroads.
C、Railroad workers’ working rights.
D、Law cases concerning the railroads.
答案
D
解析
文中第一段就提出,在1986年被裁决的所有过失案件中几乎有半涉及铁路公司,但铁路公司经常会胜诉。后面以法威尔和仓库火灾这两个案例加以说明。据此可知,本文主要讨论的是与铁路公司有关的法律案件,D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/i5xYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Inthepast10years,thecompanyhasgradually______allofitssmallerrivals.
Onceuponatime,innovationatProcter&Gambleflowedoneway:fromtheUnitedStatesoutward.WhilethelargeCincinnati-base
Whatarethoseofuswhohavechosencareersinscienceandengineeringabletodoaboutourcurrentproblems?First,wecan
With______exceptions,theformerpresidentdoesnotappearinpublicnow.
Pronouncingalanguageisaskill.Everynormalpersonisexpertintheskillofpronouncinghisownlanguage,butfewpeoplear
Thechiefeditorthoughthetooksomelibertieswiththeoriginalintranslation.Soitwasnecessarythathemakethe______sugg
ThespellingofmanyOldEnglishwordshasbeen___inthelivinglanguage,althoughtheirpronunciationshavechanged.(2011年南京大
Mrs.Greenreceivedan______letterthreateningtoexposeherprivatelifeifsherefusedtopay$10,000.(2010年北京航空航天大学考博试题)
Thisdiplomaisimportant,which______thatyouhavecompletedhighschool.(2006年中国矿业大学考博试题)
Alltheroomsonthesecondfloorhavenicely______carpets,whichareincludedinthepriceofthehouse.
随机试题
王先生,溺水,致呼吸心跳骤停,进行胸外电除颤时,两电极板应分别置于:()
(2010年4月)在我国刑法中,_______属于主刑。
养阴清肺膏的佐药是
A.早产婴儿B.年老体弱的患者C.肾移植术后患者D.即将出院的患者E.疾病恢复期患者适用于二级护理的患者是()。
在H2S溶液中加入一些Na2S固体,则()。
基金募集期限届满,封闭式基金募集的基金份额总额达到核准规模的一定比例的,才可以办理其他手续。该比例是()。
制度经济学认为,商品是同时包含“冲突、依存和秩序”这三种成分的“最小的单位”,是分析经济制度的基本范畴。()
Answerquestionsbyreferringtotheintroductionof4differentpersons.Note:Whenmorethanoneanswerisrequired,these
Accordingtotheinterview,whichofthefollowingphenomenaCANNOTbecalledsynaesthesia?
AslongastheAmericanlandwasnotcompletelysettledandtheelementsof【B1】______orderwerenotyetimposedonthefrontier,
最新回复
(
0
)