The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services ,

admin2014-10-21  49

问题 The fewer restrictions there are on the advertising of legal services, the more lawyers there are who advertise their services , and the lawyers who advertise a specific service usually charge less for that service than lawyers who do not advertise. Therefore, if the state removes any of its current restrictions, such as the one against advertisements that do not specify fee arrangements, overall consumer legal costs will be lower than if the state retains its current restrictions. Which of the following, if true, would most seriously weaken the argument concerning overall consumer legal costs?

选项 A、The state has recently removed some other restrictions that had limited the advertising of legal services.
B、The state is unlikely to remove all of the restrictions that apply solely to the advertising of legal services.
C、Lawyers who do not advertise generally provide legal ser-vices of the same quality as those provided by lawyers who do advertise.
D、Most lawyers who now specify fee arrangements in their advertisements would continue to do so even if the specification were not required.
E、Most lawyers who advertise specific services do not lower their fees for those services when they begin to advertise.

答案E

解析 如果(E)是正确的,那些在限制取消后开始进行广告宣传的律师可能都是那些在开始广告宣传时没有降低收费的律师,在这种情况下消费者在法律事务中的花费没有减少,因此,(E)削弱了该论述,是正确答案、由于(A)没有把最近限制的取消同消费者在法律事务中的费用联系起来,仅靠(A)自身没有削弱该论述。由于该论述同哪些限制实际上保留下来无关,而仅关注哪些限制将要被取消,(B)没有削弱该论述。选项(C)和(D)同评价该论述无关,该论述考虑从费用的角度分析,不考虑法律服务的质量或律师的广告内容。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/i4zYFFFM
本试题收录于: GMAT VERBAL题库GMAT分类
0

随机试题
最新回复(0)