首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked
admin
2015-06-14
552
问题
At Harvard College in September, a controversy erupted over the adoption of a "freshman pledge," which for the first time asked incoming students to sign a commitment to act with respect, integrity, and kindness in order to "promote understanding." Libertarian commentator Virginia Postrel, wrote that "treating ’kindness’ as the way to civil discourse doesn’t show students how to argue with accuracy and respect. " Harry R. Lewis, a former dean of Harvard College and someone with an excellent perspective on undergraduate education, warned that it impinged on freedom of thought and that "a student would be breaking the pledge if she woke up one morning and decided it was more important to achieve intellectually than to be kind."
Has empathy become the new scapegoat in the long-standing concern about academic attainment in American schools? Books like Academically Adrift chart the decline in academic rigor on American college campuses, citing the plummeting hours that students spend on studying and critical thinking skills. But there’s also been a troubling, and concurrent decrease in empathy over the past thirty years. A study of 14,000 college students published in Personality and Social Psychology Review in 2011 showed that the majority of college students today are less empathetic than their predecessors of prior decades. And other research even shows that education(like medical school!)can actually wring the empathy out of students.
Many people are squeamish about calls to increase empathy in young people because they wrongly assume that the ability to empathize is incompatible with traits like logic, reason, and impartiality. We’ve now entered a debate about how nice we should be or, rather, how nice we can afford to be and still stay competitive as a society, clinging to the pernicious belief that anything beneficial to young people must be painful and that we are in a rat race that is a zero-sum game.
In fact, there need be no tradeoff, at Harvard or anywhere else, between intellectual rigor and kindness. This is a false dichotomy, like the belief that a sick person must choose between a competent doctor and a humane one. Indeed, empathetic behavior listening well, for example actually makes a doctor better able to diagnose and treat illness, and studies show that when doctors are empathetic, their patients need less medication to relieve pain and less time to heal wounds.
People often equate empathy with gentleness and passivity. But empathy is really just a cognitive walk in another person’s shoes. An empathetic person is, fundamentally, a curious and imaginative person. Empathy involves a search for understanding. And we need today’s students to understand the world better in order to respond to its seemingly intractable problems.
Many educators agree that the intellectual skills required for the 21st century depend on not only a mastery of facts and figures, but also on complex communication, flexibility, collaboration, adaptability, and innovation. We live in a more open society than ever, with greater mixing of people and ideas.
The ability to master a new language, to translate scientific findings into policy, or to weave the concerns of one field into the terms of another(the way a Macintosh computer melds engineering and design), requires students to step outside of their own life experience and habits of mind. Steve Jobs had empathy for his customers.
Of course, we can always find examples of world-class thinkers who are oblivious to people’s feelings. But that doesn’t negate the fact that the vast majority of students will need to assume the perspective of others in order to get ahead in life. We can call this empathy. Or we can call it 21st century learning. It’s both. Empathy doesn’t always lead to more moral behavior, but it can lead to more intelligent behavior.
According to the passage, an empathetic person can be all the following EXCEPT
选项
A、smart.
B、ethical.
C、creative.
D、inquisitive.
答案
B
解析
细节题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/hhYYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
TheProblemsofTakingEnglishCoursesThroughEnglishWhenstudentstakecoursesthroughthemediumofEnglish,theyhaveto
MyJoyinTeachingandLearningIhavebeenengagedinteachingIntensiveReadingCoursetoPhD【1】ofScienceandTechnology
WhichofthefollowingisNOTapartofCanadianconstitution?
Weoftenreadinnovelshowaseeminglyrespectablepersonorfamilyhassometerriblesecretwhichhasbeenconcealedfromstr
Tounderstandthemarketingconcept,it’sonlynecessarytounderstandthedifferencebetweenmarketingandselling.Nottooma
Thefundamentaldistinctionbetweencompetenceandperformanceisdiscussedby
Thatexperienceinfluencessubsequentbehaviorisevidenceofanobviousbutneverthelessremarkableactivitycalled"rememberi
Todaywemakeroomforaremarkablynarrowrangeofpersonalitystyles.We’retoldthattobegreatistobebold,tobehappyi
我读过一本译著中的一番话:科学成就了一些伟大的改变.但却没能改变人生的基本事实。人类未能征服自然,只不过服从了自然,避免了一些可避免的困难。但没能除绝祸害。地震、飓风,以及类似的大骚动都提醒人们,宇宙还没有尽人自己的掌握。事实上,人类的苦难何止于天灾,还有
生活并不是一个悲剧。它是一个“搏斗”。我们生活来做什么?或者说我们为什么要有这生命?罗曼•罗兰的回答是“为的是来征服它”。我认为他说得不错。我有了生命以来,在这个世界上虽然仅仅经历了二十儿个寒暑,但是这短短的时期也并不是白白度过的。这期间我也曾看
随机试题
慢性炎症性脱髓鞘性多发性神经病是一组免疫介导炎性脱髓鞘性周围神经病。()
急性肾衰竭患者早期进行透析治疗的目的是
药品活性成分在每一单位(片、粒、瓶、支、袋)药品中的物理、化学、生物药剂学,安全性、有效性等指标的等同程度的指标是药品质量
关于正常月经的描述,哪项是错误的
我国会计电算化是从()开始的。
下列各项中,可以成为单位负责人的是()。
公积金个人住房贷款业务中,承办银行的职责包括()。
有人说,自己最了解自己,有人说自己最难了解自己。结合自身。谈谈你是否了解自己有哪些优势?
实事求是思想路线的根本途径和方法是()
设an>0,bn>0,(n=1,2,…),且满足,n=1,2,…,试证:(Ⅰ)若级数bn发散.
最新回复
(
0
)