首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-04-26
12
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures. If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
According to the author, all the students know that ______. ( )
选项
A、there are great differences among the lecturers as to their quality of teaching
B、quite a lot of teachers can produce the results students desire
C、they must be inspired to learn
D、it is too dull to attend lectures
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/gc4GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
ThebabywassenttoahospitalinLondonbecause______.Fromthispassageitseemsthatthebaby’sillnesshadsomethingtod
Greatwritersarethosewhonotonlyhavegreatthoughtsbutalsoexpressthesethoughtsinwordswhichappeal______toourmin
WhendidFather’sDayofficiallybegintohavenationalpopularity?WhatwasthefirstreactionoftheBritishpublictowardsF
Inthissixthgradeclassroom,youwouldfind______.Whichyearwouldbeincludedinthe21stCentury?
WhatwasE.B.White?E.B.White’sfirstchildren’sbookwas______.
TheBritishgovernmentoftensaysthatfurnishingchildrenwith______totheinformationsuperhighwayisatoppriority.
Workersinthefinearts______thoughtsandfeelingsthroughtheircreativeworks.
Althoughthisdiseaseisincurableatpresent,theykeepexpecting______.
HolidaycelebrationsintheUnitedStatesoften______.TheWebster’sare______.
Largemoderncitiesaretoobigtocontrol.Theyimposetheirownlivingconditionsonthepeoplewhoinhabitthem.City-dweller
随机试题
处分决定书经惩戒委员会主任签发后,应当将决定书及证据材料副本报()
不宜制成胶囊的药物为:
被保险人自有的供电,供水,供气设备因前述列明的保险责任遭受损害,引起停电,停水,停气以致造成保险标的的直接损失属于()。
办理基金备案手续时应向基金业协会报送的信息不包括()。
在按年龄编班的前提下,根据学生的学习能力或学习成绩的发展变化进行分组教学,这种分组属于()。
巴甫洛夫是操作性条件反射的提出者。()
小英同时掷甲、乙两枚质地均匀的小立方体(立方体的每个面上分别标有数字1,2,3,4,5,6).记甲立方体朝上一面的数字为x,乙立方体朝上一面的数字为y,这样就确定点P的一个坐标(x,y),那么点P落在双曲线上的概率为().
Couldyoursmartphonepreventacarfromhittingyou?GeneralMotorsandotherresearchersthinkthat’sapossibility【C1】______a
在Excel中,如果想打印某块特定的区域,可以先用鼠标选中这块区域,然后______。
Three【C1】______yearsagoDanielGabrielFahrenheitmadehis【C2】______thermometerinhishometownofDanzig(nowGdanskinPolan
最新回复
(
0
)