2. 考研
  3. Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a fraction

Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a fraction

admin2021-09-25  15
问题     Imagine being able to travel from New York to Los Angeles without having to step on a plane, yet be able to do so in a fraction of the time it would take to drive. Last month a new Japanese maglev train reached a top speed of close to 400 mph, breaking its own world record in the process. And the sight of futuristic looking trains whizzing past platforms at hundreds of miles per hour isn’t confined to Japan: China, France and Spain, to name a few, have their own high-speed rail networks. Indeed, while these bullet trains may look futuristic, they have been around for decades; they’re a tried and tested technology that the Japanese debuted over 50 years ago.
    So surely it’s only a matter of time before large numbers of U. S. passengers are doing a daily commute to New York from Washington and Boston in about the time it would take them to drive to work in their own cities, right? Not anytime soon. While several countries have undertaken the tough work of raising the money to invest in bullet trains, it’s unlikely the United States will ever see the vast network of high-speed trains that blanket other countries. Indeed, passenger rail service in the United States lags behind much of the rest of the developed world.
    Much of the United States is not exactly an ideal market for high-speed rail. Compared to places where rail really flourishes—Japan and Western Europe, for instance—-the United States is geographically vast. As a result, in much of the country, cities are far enough apart that air travel provides significant time savings, even compared to some of the fastest trains.
    The layout of cities matters, too. When you arrive in Tokyo, Paris or Barcelona, it’s often convenient and even pleasant to walk to your final destination. When it’s not, a fast and frequent mass transportation system awaits to whisk you away. This is not the case in many American cities, where arriving by train typically means jumping into a cab or renting a car for the last leg of your journey. Simply put, in many sprawling U. S. cities, getting to your destination by train can still mean you’ve got quite a way yet to get home. We could change that. And we probably should. But we’re not there yet.
    The Northeast Corridor (Boston-New York-Washington) comes in at the top of just about every list of potential candidates for high-speed rail, with the distances involved being considered within the "Goldilocks" zone for fast trains. For example, at just over 200 miles from New York to both Boston and Washington, fast trains could compete with even faster airplanes by offering centrally located stations and providing an alternative to the hassle of airport security lines. These cities are dense, have strong downtowns, and extensive mass transit systems once you arrive.
    However, the biggest barrier to improved rail service in the United States is simply the lack of political will. At the federal level, support for passenger rail service has languished and Washington has devolved decision-making (and increasingly, funding) to the states. With the nation’s transportation trust fund nearly broke and no permanent solution in sight, it seems unlikely the federal government will champion high-speed rail—a costly endeavor—in the near future.
    All this points to how high-speed rail will likely progress in the United States; piecemeal. It is doubtful that we will have a nationwide system of fast trains soon. And this is not necessarily a bad thing; through a combination of private and public action, we should target markets where highspeed rail makes sense. That means looking for shorter corridors connecting dense places with existing mass transit infrastructure.
It can be inferred from Paragraph 2 that ________.
选项 A、commuters between New York, Washington and Boston prefer to drive to work
B、each state in the US has to raise the money on its own to invest in bullet trains
C、the prospect of a huge network of high-speed trains covering the US is bleak
D、it’s only a matter of time before high-speed rails are built on a large scale in the US
答案C
解析 推断题。第二段中提到，美国不太可能像其他国家那样大力投资发展高铁，不会出现其他国家那样庞大的高速列车网络，由此推断可知，未来一段时期我们不太可能看到美国能建成覆盖范围广的高铁网络，因此选[C]。[A][B]都没有提到，属于无中生有；[D]与文义相反，文中明确否定了在美国建高铁网络只是个时间问题。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/gFq7FFFM
0

考研英语一

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)