首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
医学
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠)and stagnation(呆滞). Too
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠)and stagnation(呆滞). Too
admin
2013-12-06
57
问题
Conventional wisdom about conflict seems pretty much cut and dried. Too little conflict breeds apathy(冷漠)and stagnation(呆滞). Too much conflict leads to divisiveness(分裂)and hostility. Moderate levels of conflict, however, can spark creativity and motivate people in a healthy and competitive way.
Recent research by Professor Charles R. Schwenk, however, suggests that the optimal level of conflict may be more complex to determine than these simple generalizations. He studied perceptions of conflict among a sample of executives. Some of the executives worked for profit-seeking organizations and others for not-for-profit organizations.
Somewhat surprisingly, Schwenk found that opinions about conflict varied systematically as a function of the type of organization. Specifically, managers in not-for-profit organizations strongly believed that conflict was beneficial to their organizations and that it promoted higher quality decision making than might be achieved in the absence of conflict.
Managers of for-profit organizations saw a different picture. They believed that conflict generally was damaging and usually led to poor-quality decision making in their organizations. Schwenk interpreted these results in terms of the criteria for effective decision making suggested by the executives. In the profit-seeking organizations, decision-making effectiveness was most often assessed in financial terms. The executives believed that consensus rather than conflict enhanced financial indicators.
In the not-for-profit organizations, decision-making effectiveness was defined from the perspective of satisfying constituents. Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.
People working in a not-for-profit organization______.
选项
A、seem to be difficult to satisfy
B、are free to express diverse opinions
C、are less effective in making decisions
D、find it easier to reach agreement
答案
B
解析
本文最后一句“Given the complexities and ambiguities associated with satisfying many diverse constituents executives perceived that conflict led to more considered and acceptable decisions.”从中可以看出工作人员可以自由表达思想,企业会考虑他们的想法,从而制定决定。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/fVNDFFFM
本试题收录于:
医学博士外语题库考研分类
0
医学博士外语
考研
相关试题推荐
AboywhostrugglestoreadEnglishprimary-schoolstorybooksyethasnotroublewithuniversityphysicstextbooksinJapanesei
Althoughspeechandwritingarethespecialmeansofcommunicatingofhumans,theinterchangealsotakesplaceinmanyotherway
Womenfindamasculineface—withalargejawandaprominentbrow—-moreattractivewhentheyaremostlikelytoattractive,acco
Thereisagreatironyof21st-centuryglobalhealth:Whilemanyhundredsofmillionsofpeoplelackadequatefoodasaresulto
Thatshabbyunknownbundleofneglectanddespairthatwasdroppedoffbythepolicesixweeksago—latertobeidentifiedbyhi
MarywantedtogotoNewYorkbyherself,butherparentswouldnotgivetheir_____.
Childrenaregettingsofattheymaybethefirstgenerationtodiebeforetheirparents,anexpertclaimedyesterday.Today’sy
Physicsandchemistryhavefurnishedthetechniquesforbiologiststotaketheexplorationoflifetoitslogicalconclusion.Th
Somefuturologistshaveassumedthatthevastupsurgeofwomenintheworkforcemayportendarejectionofmarriage.Manywomen,
A、Harryacquiredthediamondringfromarelative.B、Harryspentallhismoneyonthediamondring.C、Thediamondringisverye
随机试题
据欣欣子的序说,《金瓶梅词话》的作者是()
根据他物权设立目的的不同,他物权可分为()
男性,36岁,间歇性上腹痛3年,空腹时加重,进食后缓解,胃镜检查示十二指肠壶腹部溃疡,病人近日上腹胀痛伴呕吐,呕吐物量多,为隔餐食物,腹上区有震水音。对该病人的治疗下列哪项处理措施不正确()
关于通气机湿化器,说法错误的是
其诊断为其选方为
信号是信息的()。
下列选项中,不属于影响设备投资的因素的是()
填制凭证时,确定科目的办法有()。
按照《银行业监督管理法》的规定,对发生风险的银行业金融机构的处置方式中不包括()。
对盗伐林木者要严肃查处,如果姑息肇事者,少数人得不到惩处,就会使更多的人(),最终使国家资源蒙受损失。
最新回复
(
0
)