首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on th
admin
2010-05-25
23
问题
At the fall 2001 Social Science History Association convention in Chicago, the Crime and Justice network sponsored a forum on the history of gun ownership, gun use, and gun violence in the United States. Our purpose was to consider how social science history might contribute to the public debate over gun control and gun rights. To date, we have had little impact on that debate. It has been dominated by mainstream social scientists and historians, especially scholars such as Gary Kleck, John Lott, and Michael Bellesiles, whose work, despite profound flaws, is politically congenial to either opponents or proponents of gun control.① Kleck and Mark Gertz, for instance, argue on the basis of their widely cited survey that gun owners prevent numerous crimes each year in the Untied States by using firearms to defend themselves and their property. If their survey respondents are to be believed, American gun owners shot 100,000 criminals in 1994 in self-defense—a preposterous number. Lott claims on the basis of his statistical analysis of recent crime rates that laws allowing private individuals to carry concealed firearms to deter murders, rapes ,and robberies, because criminals are afraid to attack potentially armed victims. However, he biases his results by confining his analysis to the year between 1977 and 1992, when violent crime rates had peaked and varied little from year to year. He reports only regression models that support his thesis and neglects to mention that each of ’those models find a positive relationship between violent crime and real income, and inverse relationship between violent crime and unemployment.
Contrary to Kleck and Lott, Bellesiles insists that guns and America’s "gun culture" are responsible for America’s high rate of murder. In Belleville’s opinion, relatively few Americans owned guns before the 1850s or know how to use, maintain, or repair them. As a result, he says, guns contributed little to the homicide rate, especially among Whites, which was low everywhere, even in the South and on the frontier, where historians once assumed gun and murder went hand in hand. According to Bellesiles, these patterns changed dramatically after the Mexican War and especially after the Civil War, when gun ownership became widespread and cultural changes encouraged the use of handguns to command respect and resolve personal and political disputes. The result was an unprecedented wave of gun-related homicides that never truly abated. To this day, the United States has the highest homicide rate of any industrial democracy. Bellesile’s low estimates of gun ownership in early America conflict, however, with those of every historian who has previously studied the subject and has thus far proven irreproducible. Every homicide statistic he presents is either misleading or wrong.
Given the influence of Kleck, Lott, Bellesiles and other partisan scholars on the debate over gun control and gun rights, we felt a need to pull together what social science historians have learned to date about the history of gun ownership and gun violence in America, and to consider what research methods and projects might increase our knowledge in the near future. ②
The author mentions Keleck ,Lott, and Bellesiles mainly to______.
选项
A、illustrate the influence they have on the issue of gun control
B、refute the claim that private ownership of firearms will deter violent crimes
C、support the thesis that gun ownership leads to more violence
D、show the necessity of method improvement in the study of gun ownership history
答案
D
解析
细节推断题。选项A 已经是事实了,根据第一段第四句话可知。选项B 只是Keleck和Lott的观点(私人拥有枪支可以减少犯罪),并不是Bellesiles的观点:枪支文化导致了高犯罪率,所以排除选项B 和 C ;第一段第六句说Kleck和Mark Gertz的研究结果夸大事实,本段最后一句指出Lott的数据资料选取不客观,文章第三段最后两句指出Bellesiles的统计数字要么误导要么是错误的。所以作者提及他们的目的是指出他们的错误,进而表明采用新的研究方法的重要性。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/dF8MFFFM
0
专业英语四级
相关试题推荐
Ourassociation,whichhasconsistentlypressedforgreateremploymentopportunitiesforthedisabled,willpublish______propo
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
Letusconsiderwhatscienceandtechnologyhavetocontributetothefoodproblem.Thesimplestwaytoincreasefoodprodu
随机试题
驾驶人持超过有效期的驾驶证可以在1年内驾驶机动车。
在压裂设计中,根据()的变化判断油层是否形成裂缝。
改革
男性,30岁,2周前出现干咳,伴有午后低热、盗汗、左胸痛,近几日自觉左胸痛好转,但出现气促,夜间喜左侧卧位。查体:气管向右侧移位,左侧胸廓较右侧稍饱满,左侧呼吸运动减弱,左侧触觉语颤减弱,听诊左侧呼吸音消失,双肺未闻及干、湿性啰音。该患者的诊断是
女,42岁,间歇无痛性肉眼血尿1个月。膀胱镜检查发现膀胱后壁有一个直径2.0cm大小菜花样新生物,有蒂。该病人最适合的治疗方法是
以下关于血气分析质控物的叙述错误的是
关于社会主义法治理念的理解,下列选项正确的是()。
十一届全国人大四次会议通过的“十二五”规划纲要,以()为主题、以()为主线。
甲、乙两种茶叶以x:y(重量比)混合配制成一种成品茶,甲种茶每斤50元,乙种茶每斤40元,现甲种茶价格上涨10%,乙种茶价格下降10%后,成品茶的价格保持不变,则成品茶每斤单价为:
在VisualFoxPro中,执行SQL的DELETE命令和传统的FoxProDELETE命令都可以删除数据库表中的记录,下面正确的描述是( )。
最新回复
(
0
)