For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While pol

admin2021-01-06  4

问题     For the first time in history more people live in towns than in the country. In Britain this has had a curious result. While polls show Britons rate "the countryside" alongside the royal family, Shakespeare and the National Health Service(NHS)as what makes them proudest of their country, this has limited political support.
    A century ago Octavia Hill launched the National Trust not to rescue stylish houses but to save "the beauty of natural places for everyone forever." It was specifically to provide city dwellers with spaces for leisure where they could experience "a refreshing air." Hill’s pressure later led to the creation of national parks and green belts. They don’t make countryside any more, and every year concrete consumes more of it. It needs constant guardianship.
    At the next election none of the big parties seem likely to endorse this sentiment. The Conservatives’ planning reform explicitly gives rural development priority over conservation, even authorising "off-plan" building where local people might object. The concept of sustainable development has been defined as profitable. Labour likewise wants to discontinue local planning where councils oppose development. The Liberal Democrats are silent. Only Ukip, sensing its chance, has sided with those pleading for a more considered approach to using green land. Its Campaign to Protect Rural England struck terror into many local Conservative parties.
    The sensible place to build new houses, factories and offices is where people are, in cities and towns where infrastructure is in place. The London agents Stirling Ackroyd recently identified enough sites for half a million houses in the London area alone, with no intrusion on green belt. What is true of London is even truer of the provinces.
    The idea that "housing crisis" equals "concreted meadows" is pure lobby talk. The issue is not the need for more houses but, as always, where to put them. Under lobby pressure, George Osborne favours rural new-build against urban renovation and renewal. He favours out-of-town shopping sites against high streets. This is not a free market but a biased one. Rural towns and villages have grown and will always grow. They do so best where building sticks to their edges and respects their character. We do not ruin urban conservation areas. Why ruin rural ones?
    Development should be planned, not let rip. After the Netherlands, Britain is Europe’s most crowded country. Half a century of town and country planning has enabled it to retain an enviable rural coherence, while still permitting low-density urban living. There is no doubt of the alternative—the corrupted landscapes of southern Portugal, Spain or Ireland. Avoiding this rather than promoting it should unite the left and right of the political spectrum.
Britain’s public sentiment about the countryside

选项 A、has brought much benefit to the NHS.
B、is fully backed by the royal family.
C、didn’t start till the Shakespearean age.
D、is not well reflected in politics.

答案D

解析 细节推断题。首先,这道题的题干和选项中的关键词包括public sentiment,politics,the royal family,和theNHS。这几个关键词分别出现在第一段、第二段和第三段。第一段强调的是英国人的乡村情怀。尽管在事实上居住在城市里的人多于居住在乡村里的人,民意测试却表明乡村仍是他们最骄傲的四大事情之一。第三段中提到的this sentiment应指第二段中叙述的National Trust的内容。而对于这个public sentiment about the coun—tryside,“none of the big parties seem likely to endorse this sentiment.”似乎没有一个政党赞同这种乡村情怀“on—ly sensing its chance,has sides with those pleading for a more considered approach to using green land.”只有Ukip希望能慎重地使用绿地。因此推断英国政党在政治方面没大关注公民的关于乡村的情怀,故D项正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/aGq7FFFM
0

最新回复(0)