首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
专升本
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communica
admin
2011-07-31
37
问题
Anyone who has ever attended a university knows that the quality of lecturers varies greatly. A few are very effective communicators, conveying the substance of their lectures clearly and interestingly and inspiring students to want to know more about the subject. Others produce dull lectures from which the students learn little and which are likely to kill any interest they may have in the subject. Lecturing is a major part of a university lecturer’s job and it would seem reasonable that effectiveness in this task should be a major standard in assessing a lecturer for promotion. However, it is very often the case that far more weight is given to such factors as participation in research, number of publications and even performance of administrative duties. My point of view is that a lecturer’s lecturing should be regularly evaluated and that the best people to carry out this evaluation are those directly on the receiving end.
It could, of course, be argued that students are not competent to evaluate the academic quality of lectures, If anyone should evaluate lecturers, it should be their colleagues. However, I am not arguing that students should be asked to comment on the academic content of lectures, but to evaluate the effectiveness.
I suspect that many of the objections to student evaluation stem from the fear some lecturers have of being subject to criticism by their students. However, lecturers should see such evaluation as an opportunity to become aware of defects in their lecturing techniques and thus to become better lecturers. Such a system should benefit both students and lecturers as well as help department heads to assess the strengths and weaknesses of their teaching staff.
The author believes that ______.
选项
A、many teachers are opposed to the idea of being evaluated by the students
B、students are opposed to the idea of evaluating the teachers on their own
C、students fear that they are likely to be criticized by their teachers if they are to give their assessments
D、many teachers fear that they are likely to criticize the students who have given their assessments
答案
A
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ZV3GFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语题库成考专升本分类
0
英语
成考专升本
相关试题推荐
Anopen-mindedteacherdoesn’talways______onesingleteachingmethod.
______thetimelyrescue,alotmorepeoplewouldhavebeenkilledintheearthquake.
Thatcountryhasfallenbehindothercountries(inmanufactureofcheapcottongoods).
I’llcookthepotatoesifsomeonewill______themfirst.
Beforetakingsuchatest,onehadbetter______hisorhervocabulary.
Nowhereelseintheworld______morebeautifulscenerythaninSwitzerland.
Pickouttheappropriateexpressionsfromtheeightchoicesbelowandcompletethefollowingdialoguebyblackeningthecorrespo
Mostdictionarieswilltellyouanumberof【21】aboutalanguage.Therearethreethingsinparticularthat【22】important.Theset
Whensomeonehasmoney【56】hewantstoputinasageplace,he【57】takesittoabank.Untilrecentlythevery【58】ofthebankbuil
Rodisdeterminedtogetaseatfortheconcert______itmeansstandinginaqueueallnight.
随机试题
A、ThejetwasinterceptedbyUSairforce.B、Theplane’stranspondermistakenlytransmittedcode.C、Thepilotsrepeatedlytoldc
下图是一台主机在命令模式下执行某个命令时用sniffer捕获的数据包。请根据图中信息回答下列问题。该主机上执行的命令完整内容是_【16】_
小说《风波》的作者是()
重度新生儿硬肿症复温的要求是
药师在药物临床评价中的作用是
衬衫对于()相当于()对于杂志
社会主义法和执政党的政策的区别主要表现为()。
马丁-路德说:“一个国家的繁荣,不取决于它的国库之殷实,不取决于它的城堡之坚固,也不取决于它的公共设施之华丽;而在于它的公民的文明素养,即在于人们所受的教育、人们的远见卓识和品格的高下。这才是真正的利害所在、真正的力量所在。”这说明
Whatisthewomanrequesting?
Whomakessurethecompany’sproductsaremadeproperly?Whohandlescorrespondenceforthecompany?
最新回复
(
0
)