首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the
admin
2016-01-05
28
问题
Just how much does the Constitution protect your digital data? The Supreme Court will now consider whether police can search the contents of a mobile phone without a warrant if the phone is on or around a person during an arrest.
California has asked the justices to refrain from a sweeping ruling, particularly one that upsets the old assumptions that authorities may search through the possessions of suspects at the time of their arrest. It is hard, the state argues, for judges to assess the implications of new and rapidly changing technologies.
The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice. Enough of the implications are discernable, even obvious, so that the justice can and should provide updated guidelines to police, lawyers and defendants.
They should start by discarding California’s lame argument that exploring the contents of a smartphone—a vast storehouse of digital information—is similar to, say, going through a suspect’ s purse. The court has ruled that police don’t violate the Fourth Amendment when they go through the wallet or pocketbook of an arrestee without a warrant. But exploring one’ s smartphone is more like entering his or her home. A smartphone may contain an arrestee’ s reading history, financial history, medical history and comprehensive records of recent correspondence. The development of "cloud computing", meanwhile, has made that exploration so much the easier.
Americans should take steps to protect their digital privacy. But keeping sensitive information on these devices is increasingly a requirement of normal life. Citizens still have a right to expect private documents to remain private and protected by the Constitution’s prohibition on unreasonable searches.
As so often is the case, stating that principle doesn’t ease the challenge of line-drawing. In many cases, it would not be overly burdensome for authorities to obtain a warrant to search through phone contents. They could still invalidate Fourth Amendment protections when facing severe, urgent circumstances, and they could take reasonable measures to ensure that phone data are not erased or altered while waiting for a warrant. The court, though, may want to allow room for police to cite situations where they are entitled to more freedom.
But the justices should not swallow California’s argument whole. New, disruptive technology sometimes demands novel applications of the Constitution’s protections. Orin Kerr, a law professor, compares the explosion and accessibility of digital information in the 21st century with the establishment of automobile use as a virtual necessity of life in the 20th: The justices had to specify novel rules for the new personal domain of the passenger car then; they must sort out how the Fourth Amendment applies to digital information now.
The author’ s attitude toward California’ s argument is one of
选项
A、tolerance.
B、indifference.
C、disapproval.
D、cautiousness.
答案
C
解析
态度题。根据题干关键词California’s argument定位到第二段和第三段。根据上下文和第三段首句The court would be recklessly modest if it followed California’s advice可知,作者对加利福尼亚州的提议并不赞成,故C项“不赞成”符合题意。A项“宽容”、B项“冷漠”和D项“谨慎”均与作者的态度不符。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/YWZ7FFFM
0
考研英语一
相关试题推荐
HalfacenturybeforeCharlesDarwinpublishedOntheOriginofSpecies,theFrenchnaturalistJean-BaptisteLamarckoutlinedhi
HalfacenturybeforeCharlesDarwinpublishedOntheOriginofSpecies,theFrenchnaturalistJean-BaptisteLamarckoutlinedhi
Asmillionsoffamiliesplansummervisits,theworld’sfirst,oldest,largest,andmostenviedcollectionofnationalparksis
Someoftoday’smostcutting-edgetechnologyisnowbeingusedtohelpstudentswithspecialneeds.Nolongerjusttheprovince
TheInternetbeganinthe1960sasasmallnetworkofacademicandgovernmentcomputersprimarilyinvolvedinresearchfortheU
Notwoeconomiccrisesareidentical.Butthesamequestionsrecur.Howdidwegetintothismess?Howcanwegetoutofit?How
Expertshavelongknownthatchildrenimitatemanyofthedeeds—goodandbad—thattheyseeontelevision.Butithasrarelybeen
Parenthoodisn’tacareer-killer.Infact,economistswithtwoormorekidstendtoproducemoreresearch,notless,thantheir
Oneofthebigger,nonpoliticalstoriesofthesummerhasbeenthedecisionbyLanceArmstrongtodrophisfighttoclearhisna
Socialsciencehasweighedinonthe"tigermom"debate,anditlookslikeeveryoneisright:Bothover-protectiveandlaid-back
随机试题
关于假释的说法正确的有()。
有关破伤风的护理措施错误的是
A.四环素B.甲硝唑C.螺旋霉素D.罗红霉素E.环孢素能导致牙龈增生的药物是
小儿中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比例第二次相等(第二次交叉)发生在
_______可以全面了解单位工程的成本构成和降低成本的来源。()
下列项目中,属于所有者权益类科目的是()。
按照《义务教育法》实施细则的规定,实行助学金制度的具体办法,由()级人民政府规定。
从所给的四个选项中,选出一个填在问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性:()
解释程序的功能是()。
Whatisexactlyalie?Isitanythingwesaywhichweknowisuntrue?Orisitsomethingmorethanthat?Forexample,supposea
最新回复
(
0
)