首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Strategies for Writing a Literature Review A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area.
Strategies for Writing a Literature Review A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area.
admin
2015-08-29
13
问题
Strategies for Writing a Literature Review
A literature review discusses published information in a particular subject area.
If we want to write it well, we should take the following strategies.
I. Find a focus
reason: not simply list the【B1】______, but go into detail around ideas【B1】______
II. Construct a【B2】______【B2】______
requirement: a particular perspective about the material
III. Consider【B3】______【B3】______
introduction: a topic
body: the【B4】______of sources【B4】______
conclusions: the end of the paper
IV. Organizing the body
A. a【B5】______: materials on sperm whales【B5】______
B. three typical methods
chronological method: progression of time
disadvantage: no continuity among subjects
- -by【B6】______【B6】______
reveal a change in dissection practices
- -by trend
have subsections according to eras
C.【B7】______ method: focus on a topic【B7】______
an important factor: progression of time
more authentic thematic reviews: no chronological order
D.【B8】______method: focus on the methods【B8】______
influence of methodological【B9】______:【B9】______
1)the types of the documents
2)the way of discussing documents
E. additional sections
current situation
history
【B10】______【B10】______
questions for further research
【B8】
Strategies for Writing a Literature Review
Good morning, everyone. Last class we discussed what we should do before writing a literature review: today we will talk about strategies for writing the literature review.
At first, we should find a focus. Because a literature review, like a term paper, is usually organized around ideas, not the sources themselves as an annotated bibliography would be organized.(1)This means that you will not just simply list your sources and go into detail about each one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider instead what themes or issues connect your sources together. Do they present one or different solutions? Is there an aspect of the field that is missing? Do they reveal a trend in the field? Pick one of these themes to focus the organization of your review.
(2)Secondly, use the focus you’ve found to construct a thesis statement. Yes, Literature reviews have thesis statements as well. However, your thesis statement will not necessarily argue for a position or an opinion: rather it will argue for a particular perspective on the material. Some sample thesis statements for literature reviews are as follows: The current trend in treatment for congestive heart failure combines surgery and medicine.
(3)You’ve got a focus, and you’ve narrowed it down to a thesis statement. Thirdly, you consider organization. What is the most effective way of presenting the information? What are the most important topics, subtopics, etc., that your review needs to include? And in what order should you present them? Develop an organization for your review at both a global and local level: Just like most academic papers, literature reviews also must contain at least three basic elements: an introduction or background information section:(4)the body of the review containing the discussion of sources: and, finally, a conclusion to end the paper.
OK, let’s come to the fourth part: organizing the body. Once you have the basic categories in place, then you must consider how you will present the sources themselves within the body of your paper. Create an organizational method to focus this section even further.
(5)To help you come up with an overall organizational framework for your review, consider the following scenario and then three typical ways of organizing the sources into a review:
You’ve decided to focus your literature review on materials dealing with sperm whales. This is because you’ve just finished reading Moby Dick, and you wonder if that whale’s portrayal is really real. You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm whales in biology journals written in the 1980’s. Then you look up a book written in 1968 with information on how sperm whales have been portrayed in other forms of art, as the whale hunters in the late 19th century used to do. This makes you wonder about American whaling methods during the time portrayed in Moby Dick, so you find some academic articles published in the last five years on how accurately Herman Melville portrayed the whaling scene in his novel.
If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. There is relatively no continuity among subjects here. And notice that even though the sources on sperm whales in other art and on American whaling are written recently, they are about other subjects/objects that were created much earlier. Thus, the review loses its chronological focus.
(6)In the process of using chronological method, you can order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order demonstrates a more important trend. For instance, you could order a review of literature on biological studies of sperm whales if the progression revealed a change in dissection practices of the researchers who wrote and/or conducted the studies. On the other hand, a better way to organize the above sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another trend, such as the history of whaling. Then your review would have subsections according to eras within this period.
(7)However, progression of time may still be an important factor in a thematic review. For instance, the sperm whale review could focus on the development of the harpoon for whale hunting. While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized chronologically. The only difference here between a "chronological" and a "thematic" approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon technology. But more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order.
(8)A methodological approach differs from the two above in that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Instead, it focuses on the "methods" of the researcher or writer. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art work. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community.(9)A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed.
Of course, once you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out. They should arise out of your organizational strategy.
Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Put in only what is necessary. Here are a few other sections you might want to consider: 1)Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the topic or focus of the literature review: 2)History: The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology:(10)3)Standards: The criteria you used to select the sources in your literature review or the way in which you present your information. For instance, you might explain that your review includes only peer-reviewed articles and journals: 4)Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked? How will you further your research as a result of the review?
OK, in today’s lecture, we looked at strategies for the literature review. In our next lecture, we will learn a few guidelines you should follow during the writing stage. Thank you for your attention.
选项
答案
methodological
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Y0YYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
WhendidthespaceshuttleEndeavourlandWednesdaynight?
A、Power.B、Skill.C、Patience.D、Weapons.B
Ourpublicdebatesoftenflyoffintothewildblueyonderoffantasy.Soit’sbeenwiththeFederalCommunicationsCommission’s
UnlikeBritain,AustraliahasawrittenConstitution,whichcameintoeffectin
TheDesertedVillagewaswrittenby______,theoutstandingrepresentativeofthesentimentalistschool.
WhatisthecurrentsupportingrateofBritishpeoplefortheupcoming2012LondonOlympicGamesaccordingtoSirCraigReedie?
约翰•施特劳斯的故居在一条大街上,是一座沿街的粉红色的四层楼老公寓房子。施特劳斯曾住在这座房子二层楼上的两套房间里,于1866年末到1867年初在这里谱写了《蓝色的多瑙河》这支名曲。那时他已经42岁了,在维也纳音乐界中负有盛名,但只是在这支乐曲问世以后,才
ThePeasantUprisingof1381didnotdirectagainst______.
Iwasonly8yearsoldonJuly20,1969,whenNeilArmstrong,38-year-oldcommanderofApollo11,descendedthecrampedlunarmo
作家有三种死法。一曰自然的死,二曰痛苦的死,三曰快乐的死。自然的死属于心脏停止跳动,是一种普遍的死亡形式,没有特色,可以略而不议。快乐的死和痛苦的死不属于心脏停止跳动,是人还活着,作品已经、或几乎是没有了!作家没有了作品,可以看作是个人
随机试题
尖锐湿疣的潜伏期通常为
A.阿普唑仑B.环丙沙星C.妥布霉素D.利巴韦林E.阿奇霉素属喹诺酮类的药物是
化湿药中有燥湿健脾、发汗解表、祛风湿作用的药物是()。
关于消防应急广播扬声器的设置中错误的是()。
社会评价主要应用()的一些理论和方法,通过系统的调查、收集与项目相关的各种社会因素和社会数据,分析项目实施过程中可能出现的各种社会问题。
“直客式”营销模式已成为银行近年来个人贷款业务长足发展的有力“助推器”。
董事会应定期核查银行()能否充分保证其有序和审慎地开展业务。
某企业打算采用差异化战略,该战略可以使企业产品较高价值增值。但受金融危机影响,全球购买力下降,市场需求下降,战略无法实施。该战略失效属于()。
在采用倒扣价格方法估计进口货物的完税价格时,按该价格销售的货物应当满足的条件有()。
设D为单位圆x2+y2≤1,,则()
最新回复
(
0
)