首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
The languages of the world can be divided into a number of families of related languages, possibly grouped into larger stocks, p
The languages of the world can be divided into a number of families of related languages, possibly grouped into larger stocks, p
admin
2016-10-21
37
问题
The languages of the world can be divided into a number of families of related languages, possibly grouped into larger stocks, plus a residue of isolates, languages that appear not to be genetically related to any other known languages, languages that form one-member families on their own. The number of families or stocks, languages, and isolates is hotly disputed. The disagreements centre around differences of opinion as to what constitutes a family or stock, as well as the acceptable criteria and methods for establishing them.
Linguists are sometimes divided into lumpers and splitters according to whether they lump many languages together into large stocks, or divide them into numerous smaller family groups. Merritt Ruhlen is an extreme lumper: in his classification of the world’s languages he identifies just nineteen language families or stocks, and five isolates. More towards the splitting end is Ethnologue, which identifies some ninety-four top-level families, as well as thirty-six isolates, and forty-three unclassified languages. About two hundred other exceptional languages are identified as well, including deaf sign languages. Even so, in terms of what has actually been established by application of the comparative method, the Ethnologue system is wildly lumping!
Some families, for instance Austronesian and Indo-European, are well established, and few serious doubts exist as to their genetic unity. Others are quite contentious. Both Ruhlen and Ethnologue identify an Australian family, although there is as yet no firm evidence that the languages of the continent are all genetically related. At least as contentious is Joseph Greenberg’s putative Amerind stock of Native American languages.
The Indo-European languages have been recognized as forming a family since at least the late seventeenth century, when Andreas Jager observed in 1686 that Persian and many of the languages of Europe are descendants of a single language. Since Jager’s time, many more languages have been shown to belong to the family. Indeed, Indo-European languages are spoken throughout most of Europe, across Iran, through Central Asia, and into India. With the colonial expansions of the fifteenth to nineteenth centuries, they spread into the Americas, Australia, New Zealand, Africa, and Asia, in the process, diversifying into numerous dialects. They have become major languages in many of the former colonies, and are spoken by a staggering two and a half billion speakers.
The family consists of just over 400 languages(430 according to the latest edition of Ethnologue), which can be grouped together into a number of subfamilies or branches.
More historical-comparative work has been done on Indo-European than any other language family, and many lexemes have been reconstructed for proto-Indo-European, as well as some of its grammar. Proto-Indo-European was an inflecting language, like ancient Indo-European languages such as Latin, Hittite and Ancient Greek, with a complex verbal system with different inflections for different persons and numbers of the subject, tense, aspect, mood, as well as case-marking for nouns.
Proto-Indo-European is widely believed to have been spoken in the south-east of Europe, perhaps in the region of Turkey, some six to eight thousand years ago. Opinions differ, however, and some argue for a more northerly location in the steppes of Russia. From the homelands the language spread east and west, in the process fragmenting into numerous mutually unintelligible languages.
It is now widely believed that the early period of Indo-European expansion that took the languages as far as India in the east and Ireland in the west, was not via military style invasions like the Roman conquests of 2,000-odd years ago. One influential idea is that the expansion of the languages accompanied the spread of agriculture from a centre in the near east, beginning some six to eight thousand years ago. According to one version of the story, farmers gradually spread outwards, using land previously occupied by hunters and gatherers, eventually ousting them. Another version has it that agriculture and the language of the agriculturalists spread by diffusion, without major population movements. This story is not without difficulties, and it seems that there are some problems with the timing of some events. An alternative view is that Indo-European spread instead with the domestication of the horse and the invention of the wheel.
The much smaller Uralic family consists of some thirty-eight languages, of which Finnish and Hungarian are the best known members. Uralic languages were probably once spoken over a large area in the north-east of Europe and the south-west of Asia, but were split up by intrusions of speakers of Indo-European and Altaic languages, leaving many of them geographically isolated. Hungarian is geographically separated from its relatives as a result of migrations beginning in about the sixth century AD, and continuing until about the eleventh century.
Altaic is an uncertain grouping of at least three relatively well established families, Turkic, Tungusic and Mongolic. According to some, Korean and Japanese also belong to this genetic group, although this is contested: more usually Korean and Japanese are taken to be language isolates, although according to Ethnologue, Japanese represents a small language family.
Also spoken in this large region are languages of the Caucasian families and the Chukotko-Kamchatkan family. Caucasian languages are spoken in the Caucasus region, along with Indo-European and Turkic languages. The Chukotko-Kamchatkan family is a small family of languages spoken on the two peninsulas with these names in far north-east Siberia. All of these languages are endangered, including the best known of them, Chukchi.
Which one of the following statements is INCORRECT?
选项
A、Latin belongs to one of ancient Indo-European languages.
B、Korean and Japanese belong to the group of Altaic.
C、Proto-Indo-European was perhaps spoken in the region of Turkey.
D、Finnish belongs to the Uralic family.
答案
B
解析
细节题。第六段like ancient Indo-Europeanlanguages such as Latin说明A正确;倒数第二段According to some,Korean andJapanese also belong to this genetic group,although this is contested说明此论断尚未定论,只是部分人的观点,所以B过于绝对,错误;第七段Proto-Indo-European iswidely believed to have been spoken in thesouth-east of Europe,perhaps in the regionof Turkey说明C正确;倒数第三段Themuch smaller Uralic family consists of somethirty-eight languages,of which Finnish andHungarian are the best known members.说明D正确。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/XlFYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
HistoricallyHispanicgroupshavehadgreatinfluenceontheUnitedStates.TheyaremainlyfromthefollowingcountriesEXCEPT_
InthefaceoftheGreatDepression,theNewDealpolicywasinitiatedbyPresident______fortherecoveryoftheeconomy.
Systematiceffortsatnationalnutritionplanningindevelopingcountriesgobackbarelyadecade.Duringthatbrieftimethere
Systematiceffortsatnationalnutritionplanningindevelopingcountriesgobackbarelyadecade.Duringthatbrieftimethere
InAmericanliteraryhistory,______isthefirstblackfemalepoetwhopublishedhercollectionofpoemsandwonthepraiseof
WiththeadventoftheInternet,informationcanbespreadwithunprecedentedspeedandhenceitislikelythatpeoplecanmake
Unlikeanearthquake,ademographicdisasterdoesnotstrikewithoutwarning.Japan’spopulationof127mispredictedtofallto
Virtuallyeverydayoftheyearseesanotherartbiennialopeningsomewhereintheworld.Theroleoftheseexhibitionsistosh
Imagineyou’reanemployer,lookingtohiremeforajob.YousubscribetoaWebsitethatgivesyoubackgroundinformation,and
Ididn’tknowatthetimewhathappenednext.Sartorisdidn’ttellmeuntillater,afterward.Perhapsuptothattimehehadnot
随机试题
女孩,4岁。因发热4天,伴咽痛、头痛、呕吐,昨晚发现左下肢不能站立及行走,今上午右下肢也不能站立而来诊。体检:体温38℃,神志清,心、肺无异常。双下肢肌力:右Ⅴ级,左Ⅰ级。膝、跟腱反射未引出,病理反射阴性,双下肢痛觉存在。该患者最可能的诊断是
上颌总义齿牙槽嵴的唇颊侧和舌腭侧的区域为()
A.注射点过高B.针尖刺入过深C.针尖刺入过前D.针尖刺入过后E.麻醉药注射入血管内腭前神经阻滞麻醉时出现恶心或呕吐,可能是由于
根据我国的法律规定,下列哪些情况可以形成法律关系?()。
(一)资料某公司目前拥有资金2000万元。其中,长期借款800万元,年利率10%;普通股1200万元,上年支付的每股股利2元,预计股利增长率为5%,发行价格20元,目前价格也为20元。该公司计划筹集资金100万元,企业所得税税率为25%,有两种筹资方案
银行面临风险时应该首先选择风险规避策略。()
下列剪纸,属于北方派的剪纸有()。
在教材编写过程中,课程内容前后反复出现,且后面内容是对前面内容的扩展和深化,这种教材编排方式是()。
阅读下面的叙述,回答问题1、问题2、问题3和问题4,将解答填入对应栏内。【说明】某信息系统工程监理有限责任公司负责人召集该公司有关人员就本公司有关依法经营、加强企业管理、市场开发、竞争及承揽业务中应注意的问题进行了讨论。
下述程序为一数据段,正确的判断是( )。 DATA SEGMENT X DB 332H FIRST=1 FIRST EQU 2 ENDS
最新回复
(
0
)