2. 外语
  3. A federal judge on Monday certified a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light

A federal judge on Monday certified a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light

admin2012-07-13  37
问题     A federal judge on Monday certified a $ 200 billion class action lawsuit against the tobacco industry for its marketing of light cigarettes.
    Eastern District of New York Judge Jack B. Weinstein’s 540-page opinion in Schwab v. Philip Morris USA, Inc. , 04-CIV-1945 — which included an additional 965 pages of appendices for a total of 1,505 pages - gave tens of millions of smokers an avenue to recover damages from the nation’s largest tobacco companies, including Philip Morris USA Inc. , R. J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , Lorillard Tobacco Co. , and Liggett Group, Inc.
    The class will include anyone who purchased light cigarettes from the time tobacco companies began selling them in the 1970s. The judge said he even would consider broadening the class, to encompass smokers of all " low tar" brands, not just light cigarettes. The judge suggested that an expansion of the class could assist the parties in negotiating a global settlement. He set a trial date for January 22, 2007. The plaintiffs intend to seek treble damages.
    Weinstein has expressed skepticism about the plaintiffs’ theory of damages, which alleges that light smokers were defrauded of billions because they believed they were buying a product of greater value because of its health advantages. The judge also questioned the size of the class, as well as the claim that as many as 90 percent of light cigarette smokers chose the cigarettes because they were less harmful.
    In his ruling Monday, the judge stressed that while the suit was far from perfect, the evidence was sufficient. He said the jury system — which he described as the " ultimate focus group of the law" — was well equipped to sort out the particulars in accordance with Amendment VII of the U. S. Constitution.
    Weinstein declined to grant an interlocutory appeal to the 2nd U. S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Theodore M. Grossman of Jones Day in Cleveland, which represents R. J. Reynolds, said the defendants would seek a stay and appeal the class certification under Rule 23 (f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
The phrase "product of greater value" underlined in Paragraph 4 refers to______.
选项 A、lawsuit plaintiffs
B、theoretical damages
C、light cigarettes
D、health advantages
答案C
解析 细节题型见第四段第一句：Weinstein表达了他对原告(the plaintiffs)所要求的赔偿金的怀疑；原告的理论断言吸淡烟的人因为相信他们购买的是对健康无害的价值巨大的产品，因此才会受骗去花大量的金钱；因此此处The“product of greater value”指的是淡烟，C为答案。此外本题答案也可从对句子结构的判断中得出——见which引导的非限制性定语从句。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Xd2YFFFM
本试题收录于： CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格（CATTI）分类
0

CATTI二级笔译综合能力

翻译专业资格（CATTI）

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)