Why do animals grow old and die at characteristic ages? Even if maintained in peak condition and not eaten by your cat, your ham

admin2019-08-08  34

问题    Why do animals grow old and die at characteristic ages? Even if maintained in peak condition and not eaten by your cat, your hamster is unlikely to make it much past its second birthday. And your cat might live for ten times that. Yet neither cat nor hamster will ever match the average healthy human for longevity.
   A study uses demographic data to reveal a lifespan that human beings cannot exceed. It’s like running. 【F1】Elite athletes might shave a few milliseconds off the world record for the 100-metre race, but they’ll never run the same distance in, say, five seconds, or two. Human beings are simply not made that way. The same is true for longevity. 【F2】The consequences of numerous factors related to our genetics, metabolism, reproduction and development, all shaped over millions of years of evolution, means that few humans will make it past their 120th birthdays.
   Maximum lifespan is a bald measure of years accumulated. It is not the same as life expectancy, which is an actuarial measure of how long one is expected to live from birth, or indeed from any given age. 【F3】Life expectancy at birth has increased in most countries over the past century, not because people have longer lifespans, but mainly because infectious disease does not kill as many infants as it once did.
   【F4】So if we owe our increases in life expectancy to better public health, nutrition, sanitation and vaccination, is it not fair to ask whether more-effective treatments for diseases such as cancer, Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s might also yield dividends in maximum lifespan? Will 120th birthday parties become routine, outmatched by a small yet increasing number of sesquicentenarians? The demographic data say no. People are living longer, and the population as a whole is greying, but the rate of increase in the number of centenarians is slowing, and might even have peaked.
   Could it be possible, in some science-fictional future, to break free from the bonds of human life expectancy and increase lifespan indefinitely? Technological solutions might one day transcend the limitations of the human body. But the risks of transcendence are twofold. 【F5】First, it might be that to extend our lives beyond our normal span, we must somehow become other than human. After all, what would a 50-year-old hamster be like? Second, there is a risk that life wouldn’t really be that much longer—it would only feel like it.
【F4】

选项

答案如果我们把预期寿命的延长归功于公共医疗、营养、卫生和免疫等方面的改善,那么是否可合理推论:如果进一步提高癌症、帕金森综合症和老年痴呆症等疾病的治疗成效,人类最长寿命尚会有上升空间?

解析 ①本句是复合句。主句是一般疑问句,其陈述句语序为it is not fair to ask whether...。it是形式主语,真正的主语是后面的不定式结构to ask…。②such as后面的cancer,Parkinson’s disease and Alzheimer’s 是对diseases的举例说明。③dividend本义是“股息,红利”,dividends in maximum lifespan是指人类最长寿命值的增长。④条件状语从句使用了owe…to…“将……归因于……”结构。此处是将our increases in life expectancy“人类预期寿命的延长”归因于better public health,nutrition,sanitation and vaccination“更好的公共医疗、营养、卫生和免疫的改善”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/WI87FFFM
0

最新回复(0)