首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more
admin
2017-11-28
42
问题
Can electricity cause cancer? In a society that literally runs on electric power, the very idea seems preposterous. But for more than a decade, a growing band of scientists and journalists has pointed to studies that seem to link exposure to electromagnetic fields with increased risk of leukemia and other malignancies. The implications are unsettling, to say the least, since everyone comes into contact with such fields, which are generated by everything electrical, from power lines and antennas to personal computers and micro-wave ovens. Because evidence on the subject is inconclusive and often contradictory, it has been hard to decide whether concern about the health effects of electricity is legitimate — or the worst kind of paranoia.
Now the alarmists have gained some qualified support from the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In the executive summary of a new scientific review, released in draft form late last week, the EPA has put forward what amounts to the most serious government warning to date. The agency tentatively concludes that scientific evidence "suggests a casual link" between extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields — those having very long wave lengths — and leukemia, lymphoma and brain cancer. While the report falls short of classifying ELF fields as probable carcinogens, it does identify the common 60-hertz magnetic field as " a possible , but not proven, cause of cancer in humans. "
The report is no reason to panic — or even to lost sleep. If there is a cancer risk, it is a small one. The evidence is still so controversial that the draft stirred a great deal of debate within the government, and the EPA released it over strong objections from the Pentagon and the White House. But now no one can deny that the issue must be taken seriously and that much more research is needed.
At the heart of the debate is a simple and well-understood physical phenomenon: When an electric current passes through a wire, it generates an electromagnetic field that exerts forces on surrounding objects. For many years, scientists dismissed any suggestion that such forces might be harmful, primarily because they are so extraordinarily weak. The ELF magnetic field generated by a video terminal measures only a few milligauss, or about one-hundredth the strength of the earth’s own magnetic field. The electric fields surrounding a power line can be as high as 10 kilo volts per meter, but the corresponding field induced in human cells will be only about 1 millivolt per meter. This is far less than the electric fields that the cells themselves generate.
How could such minuscule forces pose a health danger? The consensus used to be that they could not, and for decades scientists concentrated on more powerful kinds of radiation, like X-rays, that pack sufficient wallop to knock electrons out of the molecules that make up the human body. Such "ionizing" radiations have been clearly linked to increased cancer risks and there are regulations to control emissions.
But epidemiological studies, which find statistical associations between sets of data, do not prove cause and effect. Though there is a body of laboratory work showing that exposure to ELF fields can have biological effects on animal tissues, a mechanism by which those effects could lead to cancerous growths has never been found.
The Pentagon is far from persuaded. In a blistering 33-page critique of the EPA report, Air Force scientists charge its authors with having "biased the entire document" toward proving a link. "Our reviewers are convinced that there is no suggestion that (electromagnetic fields) present in the environment induce or promote cancer," the Air Force concludes. "It is astonishing that the EPA would lend its imprimatur on this report." Then Pentagon’s concern is understandable. There is hardly a unit of the modern military that does not depend on the heavy use of some kind of electronic equipment, from huge ground-based radar towers to the defense systems built into every warship and plane.
It can be inferred from the physical phenomenon that______ ______.
选项
A、the force of the electromagnetic field is too weak to be harmful
B、the force of the electromagnetic field is weaker than the electric field that the cells generate
C、electromagnetic fields may affect health
D、only more powerful radiation can knock electrons out of the human body
答案
A
解析
事实细节题。根据题干中的physical phenomenon将本题出处定位于第四段第一句。本句指出,争辩的中心就是一个简单又容易理解的物理现象:当电流通过电线时,会产生电磁场,对周围事物施加一种力。第二句指出,多年来,科学家们都不认可这种力会产生危害,主要是因为它们太微弱了,故答案为[A]项。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/UUwUFFFM
本试题收录于:
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
翻译硕士(翻译硕士英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
Theincreasedavailabilityofcopyrightedmaterialduetothedevelopmentofinformationtechnologyhasfurtheredthedebateas
NewZealandisinthegripofaneggshortageastheindustryundergoesamassiveperiodofdisruptionwhileittransitionstof
Urgentactionisneededincountriesimpactedbyfragility,conflictandviolence(FCV)toendextremepovertyglobally,accordi
Everymemberofsocietyhastomakea______tostruggleforthefreedomofthecountry.
Inthe1960s,medicalresearchersThomasHolmesandRichardRahedevelopedachecklistofstressfulevents.Theyappreciatedthe
Thepolicementhreadedtheirwaythroughthebuildingtolookforagunman______.
Foreachquestionbelow,choosetheanswerthatbestcompletesthesentence.ThenwritethecorrespondingletterontheAnswerS
______wooden,buildingshelpstoprotectthemfromdamageduetoweather.
Biologistssaythey______anddamageaquaticvegetationwiththeirvoraciousfeeding,leavinglessfoodandcoverforotherwater
Turkeys(thebirds)areoriginallyfromtheAmericas.TheEuropeansknewasimilarlookingandtastingbird,knownnowadaysasG
随机试题
唐以前的诗以及后人模仿古诗而不按近体诗的格律所写的诗统称为古体诗。()
Theysearchedforhours,butnowhere______found.
下列哪项病症临床听诊可有心律不齐
A.心力衰竭控制后,心杂音增强B.心力衰竭控制后,心杂音减弱C.应用硝酸甘油后,心杂音增强D.心尖区收缩期喀喇音及收缩期杂音E.主动脉瓣第二心音亢进,呈金属样音调风湿性瓣膜病
下列关于慢性肾盂肾炎的临床表现,不正确的是
脂肪酸β-氧化第一次脱氢的辅酶是
下列有关公文知识的表述中正确的是()。
五笔型输入法是
CriticsandsupportersoftheUnitedNationshavesometimesseenworldsapart.Butsincelastyear,almostallofthem,whether
Thechairmanoftheboard______onmetheunpleasantjobofdismissinggoodworkersthefirmcannolongeraffordtoemploy.
最新回复
(
0
)