The ruling of America’s Supreme Court The Grokster decision was based on the evidence that Grokster

admin2011-10-20  30

问题 The ruling of America’s Supreme Court
The Grokster decision was based on the evidence that Grokster

选项 A、distributed P2P software illegally.
B、allowed users sharing without permission.
C、violated the copyright of entertainment firms.
D、took advantage of Betamax standard.

答案B

解析 本题问关于Grokster侵权的裁决的根据是什么。由关键词"Grokster"可定位到第三段。第三段第五句提到"The justices ruled that the case raised a far narrower issue:whether Grokster induced users to violate copyrights and chose not to take the simple steps available to prevent it",可以看出法庭裁决的标准是看Grokster公司是否诱导用户侵权,是否采取措施阻止他们。结合第二段首句:Grokster输了官司,即该公司故意误导用户侵权且没有采取措施阻止他们。可以看出:Grokster允许用户不经许可地共享文件。故"允许用户不经许可地共享文件"正确。非法发布P2P软件:由第三段首句"The court was asked to decide whether Grokster was liable for copyright violation by their customers"知,本官司是讨论Grokster公司是否需要为他们用户的侵权行为负责,并非是否合法发布P2P软件的问题。本项也属常识项,P2P软件在某些国家被视为非法,出题人正是利用这一点设置本干扰项。侵犯了娱乐公司的版权:由第三段首句中"…was liable for copyright violation by their customers"可知,侵犯了版权的是Grokster公司的顾客,而不是公司本身。受益于Betamax标准:这是对第三段倒数第二句中"…even under the Betamax standard"的曲解。文中的意思是:即使该诉讼根据Betamax标准,也应判Grokster败诉。显然,受益于Betamax标准不是Grokster败诉的原因。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/TK0RFFFM
0

最新回复(0)