首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
A dozen years ago, James Grant — one of the wisest commentators on Wall Street — wrote a book called The Trouble with Prosperity
A dozen years ago, James Grant — one of the wisest commentators on Wall Street — wrote a book called The Trouble with Prosperity
admin
2018-06-29
35
问题
A dozen years ago, James Grant — one of the wisest commentators on Wall Street — wrote a book called The Trouble with Prosperity. Grant’s survey of financial history captured his crusty theory of economic predestination. If things seem splendid, they will get worse. Success inspires overconfidence and excess. If things seem dismal, they will get better. Crisis spawns opportunity and progress. Our triumphs and follies follow a rhythm that, though it can be influenced, cannot be repealed.
Good times breed bad, and vice versa. Bear that in mind. It provides context for today’s turmoil and recriminations. The recent astounding events — the government’s takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, the Treasury’s investments in private banks, the stock market’s wild swings — have thrust us into fierce debate. Has enough been done to protect the economy? Who or what caused this mess?
We Americans want problems with instant solutions. We want victories and defeats with clear heroes and villains. We crave a world of crisp moral certitudes, when the real world is awash with murky ambiguities. So it is now. Start with the immediate question: has enough been done? Well, enough for what? If the goal is to prevent a calamitous collapse of bank lending, the answer is probably "yes".
Last week, the government guaranteed most interbank loans(loans among banks) and pressured nine major banks to accept $ 125 billion of added capital from the Treasury. Together, these steps make it easier for banks to borrow and lend. There’s less need to hoard cash. But if the goal is to inoculate us against recession and more financial turmoil, the answer is "no".
We’re probably already in recession. In September, retail sales dropped 1. 2 percent. The housing collapse, higher oil prices( now receding), job losses and sagging stocks have battered confidence. Consumption spends — more than two thirds of all spending — may drop in the third quarter for the first time since 1991. Loans are harder to get, because there’s been a "correction of lax lending standards," says financial consultant Bert Ely. Economist David Wyss of Standard & Poor’s expects unemployment, now 6.1 percent, to reach 7. 5 percent by year-end 2009.
Ditto for financial perils, " the United States has an enormous financial system outside the banks," says economist Raghuram Rajan of the University of Chicago. Take hedge funds. They manage nearly $ 2 trillion and rely heavily on borrowed funds. They could destabilize the markets as they’re pressured to sell. They’ve suffered heavy redemptions — $ 43 billion in September, according to the Financial Times. There’s also a global chain reaction. Losses in one market inspire losses in others; and nervous international investors sell everywhere. Brazil’s market has lost about half its value in the past year.
In this fluid situation, one thing is predictable: the crisis will produce a cottage industry of academics, journalists, pundits, politicians and bloggers to assess blame. Is former Fed chairman Alan Greenspan responsible for holding interest rates too low and for not imposing tougher regulations on mortgage lending? Would Clinton Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin have spotted the crisis sooner? Did Republican free-market ideologies leave greedy Wall Streets types too unregulated? Was Congress too permissive with Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?
Some stories are make-believe. After leaving government, Rubin landed at Citigroup as "senior counselor. " He failed to identify toxic mortgage securities as a big problem in the bank’s own portfolio. It’s implausible to think he’d have done so in Washington. As recent investigative stories in the New York Times and The Washington Post show, the Clinton administration broadly supported the financial deregulation that Democrats are now so loudly denouncing.
Greenspan is a harder case. His resistance to tougher regulation of mortgage lending is legitimately criticized, but the story of his low-interest rate policies is more complicated. True, the overnight fed-funds rate dropped to 1 percent in 2003 to offset the effects of the burst tech bubble and 9/11. Still. The Fed started raising rates in mid-2004. Unfortunately and surprisingly, long-term interest rates on mortgages(which are set by the market) didn’t follow. That undercut the Fed and is often attributed to a surge of cheap capital from China and Asia.
There’s a broader lesson. When things go well, everyone wants to get on the bandwagon. Skeptics are regarded as fools. It’s hard for government — or anyone else — to say, "Whoa, cowboys; this won’t last. " In this respect, the tech bubble and the housing bubble were identical twins.
We suffer cycles of self-delusion, sometimes too giddy and sometimes too glum. The next recovery usually lies in the ruins of the last recession.
As the housing boom strengthened, lenders overlent, builders overbuilt and buyers overpaid. Existing home prices rose 50 percent from 2000 to 2006. Lending standards weakened. Investment bankers packaged dubious loans in increasingly opaque securities. But bankers — to their eventual regret — kept many bad loans themselves. Almost everyone assumed that home prices would rise forever, so risks were minimal. Congress was complicit. It allowed Fannie and Freddie to operate with meager capital. They were, in effect, giant hedge funds backed by government congress also increased the share of their mortgages that had to go to low — and moderate-income buyers, form 40 percent in 1996 to 52 percent in 2005. This blessed and promoted supreme mortgage lending.
So Grant’s thesis is confirmed. We go through cycles of self-delusion, sometimes too giddy and sometimes too glum. The only consolation is that the genesis of the next recovery usually lies in the ruins of the last recession. Optimistic Americans "recognize error and put it behind them," Grant writes in the current Foreign Affairs. The Pew survey reports this contrast: though half of Americans believe there’s a recession, almost half also think the economy will improve in the next year.(by Robert J. Samuelson, from Newsweek, October 27, 2008)
In the sentence " Investment bankers packaged dubious loans in increasingly opaque securities" , the word "opaque" may roughly mean______.
选项
A、unstable
B、inefficient
C、unclear
D、inoperable
答案
C
解析
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/T81YFFFM
本试题收录于:
CATTI二级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI二级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Ithinktheexistingcompaniesusuallyencouragetheso-called"provenway",somethingthathasworkedbefore,insteadofinnov
Thebigchallengewefaceintheseearlyyearsofthe21stcentury,ishowtogrowoureconomiesandensuresharedprosperityto
ThepromiseofAmericawasborninthe18thcenturyoutoftheboldconvictionthatweareallcreatedequal.Itwasextendedan
A、Inthe1960s.B、Inthe1940s.C、Inthe1970s.D、Inthe1950s.B题干:在美国大规模的涌向郊区的运动始于什么时候?根据原文“Inthe1940s,urbanAmericansbegan
Whenisanordinarytropicalstormcalledahurricane?
StreetArtinLA.InLosAngeles,artistsareuncoveringsomeofthecity’shiddenculture.Severalphotographersare【L1】_
RitualChildKillingsSpreadAlarm,AngerinIvoryCoastAtleast21childrenhavebeenkidnappedinIvoryCoastsinceDecemb
RitualChildKillingsSpreadAlarm,AngerinIvoryCoastAtleast21childrenhavebeenkidnappedinIvoryCoastsinceDecemb
随机试题
患者,女性,45岁。失眠多梦,心悸,气短头晕,肢倦乏力,面色萎黄,纳少,大便溏薄,舌淡,苔白,脉细弱。所选中成药的功效是
一患者车祸后2小时送至医院,诉咳嗽、胸部疼痛。查T38.5℃,P130次/分,1t30次/分,BP90/60mmHg,神清,右胸部压痛明显,右肺呼吸音低,右下肢有骨折征。胸片示:右侧液气胸。创伤种类为
微囊药物的制剂持量应从以下几方面控制
用已知pH值的标准缓冲液校正pH计的目的是
门头沟县公安局在对刘某的抢劫案侦查终结时发现刘某另有杀人的嫌疑,但此时对刘某侦查羁押期限已届满。鉴于需对该杀人案进行侦查,公安局决定对刘某继续羁押,并重新计算侦查羁押期限。此时公安局应如何履行法律手续:
某日我国外汇市场美元兑人民币的即期汇率为6.00,美国市场年化利率为3%,中国市场年化利率为8%,假设12个月的美元兑人民币远期汇率为6.3,则某一国内交易者()。
下列合同中,当事人一方有权请求法院或仲裁机构变更或者撤销合同的有()。
企业管理者对待非正式组织的态度应该是______。
在疟疾流行地区,许多人多次感染疟疾后,对此病产生免疫力。很明显,感染一次疟疾后人的免疫系统仅受到轻微的激活;而多次感染疟疾,与疟原虫接触,可产生有效的免疫反应,使人免于患疟疾。以下哪项如果为真,最能削弱上述结论?
Theproblemwithtoday’shousingcrisis,politically,isthatitisjustnotallthatvisible.AttheendoftheSecondWorldWa
最新回复
(
0
)