It began with some marsh/mallows(棉花软糖). In the 1960s Walter Mischel, a psychologist then working at Stanford University, started

admin2016-03-08  35

问题     It began with some marsh/mallows(棉花软糖). In the 1960s Walter Mischel, a psychologist then working at Stanford University, started a series of experiments on young children. A child was left alone for 15 minutes with a marshmallow or similar treat, with the promise that, if it remained uneaten at the end of this period, a second would be added. Some of the children, who were aged four or five at the time, yielded to temptation before time was up. Others resisted, and held out for the reward.
    Dr. Mischel then followed the children’s progress as they grew up. Those who had resisted, he found, did better at school than those who had given in. As adults they got better jobs, were less likely to use drugs and got into trouble with the law less frequently. Moreover, children’s family circumstances suggested that impulsive behavior was as much learned as inherited. This suggested that it could be unlearned—improving the child in question’s chances in life.
    Study after study has confirmed Dr. Mischel’s insight. However, recent observations, however, raise the possibility that developing self-control is not always an unalloyed(纯粹的)good.
    Work published two years ago by Gene Brody of the University of Georgia, who looked at a group of young black Americans, showed that those who exhibited self-control as teenagers did indeed get the expected benefits. But if such self-controllers came from deprived backgrounds, they developed higher blood pressure, were more likely to be obese and had higher levels of stress hormones than their less-setf-controlled peers. That correlation did not apply to people who started farther up the social ladder.
    Dr. Brody and his colleagues have followed this study with one that comes to an equally astonishing conclusion: for people born at the bottom of the social heap, self-control speeds up the process of ageing.
    Dr. Brody and his colleagues followed almost 300 black American teenagers of different backgrounds as they aged from 17 to 22. For the first few years the researchers assessed their volunteers’ levels of self-control, and also looked for signs of depression, aggression and drug use. They assessed, too, those volunteers’ socioeconomic backgrounds. But the last examination, when participants were 22 years old, was different. Then, the researchers took a blood sample, recorded the DNA-methylation(DNA甲基化)patterns of cells in it, and worked out how much these deviated from the pattern expected at that particular age. As the study shows, for people from high-status backgrounds, higher self-control meant lower cellular ages. For those whose background was low-status, the reverse was true.
    Dr. Brody’s findings are both intriguing and worrying. The research into gene methylation suggests changing methylation patterns are a common response to changing circumstances as well as changing age, as the body’s physiology struggles to keep up. Fortunately, people can change their circumstances in rational ways: the lesson of the marshmallows shows that. If Dr. Brody’s result is confirmed, the challenge it poses will be to work out how to avoid the adverse effects of self-control.
What can we infer about DNA-methylation from the passage?

选项 A、It can reveal levels of self-control.
B、It relates to the physiological age.
C、It is one of the ingredients of blood.
D、It changes with social circumstance.

答案B

解析 推理判断题。定位句指出,研究者通过记录细胞DNA甲基化模式,对比研究对象与特定年龄的细胞年龄的情况,从而得出研究对象的生理年龄情况,可见,DNA甲基化与人类的生理年龄有所关联,故答案为B)。A)“它能揭示自控力水平”,从定位句可知,研究者研究DNA甲基化模式是为了观察细胞年龄,而原文并没提到它可以显示自控力水平,故可排除;C)“它是血液中的一种成分”,研究者抽取血液记录细胞DNA甲基化模式,只能说明从分析血液的途径反应甲基化模式,不能说DNA甲基化是血液的成分,故可排除;D)“它随着社会环境而变化”,文中提到对于同样发展自控力的人群而言,不同社会背景可能会造成不同的影响,但不能笼统地说甲基化模式会随着社会环境而变化,故可排除。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/ReJFFFFM
0

最新回复(0)