首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
职业资格
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same.
admin
2021-06-06
47
问题
It’s one of the things we are most afraid might happen to us. We go to great lengths to avoid it. And yet we do it all the same. That is, we marry the wrong person. So here is the question, why will we marry the wrong person?
For most of recorded history, people married for logical sorts of reasons: because her parcel of land adjoined yours, his family had a flourishing business, her father was the magistrate in town, there was a castle to keep up, or both sets of parents subscribed to the same interpretation of a holy text. And from such reasonable marriages, there flowed loneliness, infidelity, abuse, hardness of heart and screams heard through the nursery doors. The marriage of reason was not, in hindsight, reasonable at all; it was often expedient, narrow-minded, snobbish and exploitative. That is why what has replaced it—the marriage of feeling—has largely been spared the need to account for itself.
What matters in the marriage of feeling is that two people are drawn to each other by an overwhelming instinct and know in their hearts that it is right. Indeed, the more imprudent a marriage appears (perhaps it’s been only six months since they met; one of them has no job or both are barely out of their teens), the safer it can feel.
But though we believe ourselves to be seeking happiness in marriage, it isn’t that simple. What we really seek is familiarity—which may well complicate any plans we might have had for happiness. We are looking to recreate, within our adult relationships, the feelings we knew so well in childhood. The love most of us will have tasted early on was often confused with other more destructive dynamics: feelings of wanting to help an adult who was out of control, of being deprived of a parent’s warmth or scared of his anger, of not feeling secure enough to communicate our wishes. How logical, then, that we should as grown-ups find ourselves rejecting certain candidates for marriage not because they are wrong but because they are too right—too balanced, mature, understanding and reliable—given that in our hearts, such Tightness feels foreign. We marry the wrong people because we don’t associate being loved with feeling of happiness.
Finally, we marry to make a nice feeling permanent. We imagine that marriage will help us to bottle the joy we felt when the thought of proposing first came to us: Perhaps we were in Venice, on the lagoon, in a motorboat, with the evening sun throwing glitter across the sea, chatting about aspects of our souls no one ever seemed to have grasped before, with the prospect of dinner in a risotto place a little later. We married to make such sensations permanent but failed to see that there was no solid connection between these feelings and the institution of marriage.
The good news is that it doesn’t matter if we find we have married the wrong person. We mustn’t abandon him or her, only the founding romantic idea upon which the Western understanding of marriage has been based the last 250 years: that a perfect being exists who can meet all our needs and satisfy our every yearning. We need to swap the romantic view for a tragic (and at points comedic) awareness that every human will frustrate, anger, annoy, madden and disappoint us—and we will (without any malice)
do the same to them
.
The person who is best suited to us is not the person who shares our every taste (he or she doesn’t exist), but the person who can negotiate differences in taste intelligently—the person who is good at disagreement. Rather than some notional idea of perfect complementarity, it is the capacity to tolerate differences with generosity that is the true marker of the "not overly wrong" person. Compatibility is an achievement of love; it must not be its precondition.
Which of the following is the key to a happy marriage according to the passage?
选项
A、Commonalities in every taste.
B、Mutual attraction at first sight.
C、Generosity in fixing differences.
D、Complementarity in most aspects.
答案
C
解析
细节题。A项“拥有共同的喜好”,B项“一见钟情”,C项“大度地解决分歧”,D项“在很多方面互补”。根据最后一段可知,真正适合自己的人不是和我们喜好都相同的人,而是能够大度地容忍差异的人。A项错误,C项正确。找到这样一个合适的人是一段幸福婚姻的关键。互补是爱情的成果,而非前提。D项错误。B项原文未提及。故本题选C。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/P7WiFFFM
本试题收录于:
英语学科知识与教学能力题库教师资格分类
0
英语学科知识与教学能力
教师资格
相关试题推荐
我国三大旅行社中国旅行社、中国国际旅行社、中国青年旅行社成立的时间分别是()。
有声音而无固定语义的语言指的是()。
It’soneofthethingswearemostafraidmighthappentous.Wegotogreatlengthstoavoidit.Andyetwedoitallthesame.
Waitrosehasunveileditsvisionofenvironmentallyconsciousshopping,offeringcustomersthechancetobuyfoodanddrinkthat
WhichofthefollowingactivitiesisNOTappropriatefordevelopingstudents’awarenessofdiscoursecoherence?
Whichofthefollowingactivitiesbestpromotesthedevelopmentofstudents’communicativeskills?
It’soneofourcommonbeliefsthatmiceareafraidofcats.Scientistshavelongknownthatevenifamousehasneverseenaca
It’soneofourcommonbeliefsthatmiceareafraidofcats.Scientistshavelongknownthatevenifamousehasneverseenaca
Childrenwhospendmorethantwohoursadayatacomputerorwatchingtelevisionaremorelikelythanotherstohavementalpro
随机试题
盐析法沉淀蛋白质的原理是
美育是培养学生正确的______,从而使学生具有感受美、鉴赏美、表现美和创造美能力的教育。
肝性脑病清醒后可逐步增加蛋白质饮食,最好食用()。
某患者,缺失,缺隙过宽,可摘局部义齿修复若对颌牙伸长,排牙时则要注意
根据《建设工程质量管理条件》,( )不符合工程监理单位质量责任和义务的规定。
《中华人民共和国义务教育法》规定义务教育和基础教育阶段,学校教育必须做到“两个全面”,即()
检验假设的方法主要有直接检验和________两种。
案例一:以下是《十几减九》的教学片段:教师先让学生独立思考例题“12—9”的计算方法,然后展开师生对话,交流算法。师:谁来介绍自己的方法,告诉大家你是怎么想的?生1:我是数出来的。师:你是怎么数出来的呢?
现代家居设计中,最能体现设计感的往往是部分而非整体,一个“点睛之笔”的创意设计往往能让人眼前一亮,并能迅速提升整个居室的层级。这表明()。
为了提高测试的效率,应该( )。
最新回复
(
0
)