首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning
admin
2011-02-28
33
问题
Directions: For 30 years, the Darling Chemical Company has got rid of its waste by dumping it in the River Darling or by burning it. Most of the people living in Darling work for the company, so there have been a few complaints. The local radio station has interviewed five people about their views on the issue. For questions 61 to 65, match the name of each person to one of the statements ( A to G) given below. Mark your answers on ANSWER SHEET 1.
Mrs. Sue Pearson:
We don’t want to be here, but what can we do? You see, last year my husband found out that he had cancer. Doctors advised us to leave Darling. We planned to buy a farm 50 miles away. But before we could save enough money for the deposit, he lost his job. Now I can’t see how we’ll ever be able to get away from him. I don’t know what to do.
George Clark:
I certainly do not accept that my company is responsible. We can’t be responsible. It is an absolutely ridiculous opposition. If people choose to work here or live nearby, they must accept the risks. We did not bring the company to the town. The town grew up round the chemical factory. And part of the reason the town is such a thriving community today, is because of my company. Of course, there is a little pollution. There is always pollution in the chemical industry. It can’t be helped because this country needs chemicals — without this company 3,000 people would be jobless.
Richard Carr:
I think the Darling Chemical Company should be held fully responsible for the trouble and the suffering they have brought to the local people. We are suing for over a million pounds in compensation, and we are also asking for a court order to close the factory. I’m confident that we shall win. What worries me is that it’s impossible to stop this kind of thing until it’s too late. I think the government should have introduced strict pollution controls long ago.
Linda Jackson:
I think pollution is a crime against society and must be punished. Already many towns are worse than Darling. If we don’t act soon, this country will be uninhabitable. I propose to fix strict limits for discharge of pollution. All companies which exceed these limits negligently will pay heavy fines. All companies which exceed the limits deliberately will be closed and their managers will go to prison.
Graham Paterson:
Pollution from the factories is not the only problem. Motor vehicles and aircraft pollute the air. Oil tankers pollute the sea. Many city governments discharge sewage into their rivers and leave mountains of garbage in the countryside. Pollution occurs everywhere and it is getting worse and worse. However, all of this could be avoided. There are engines which do not cause air pollution. Garbage can be recycled and sewage can be converted to energy. Private companies won’t make the necessary investments. This money really does have to come from the government.
Now match each of the persons to the appropriate statement.
Note: There are two extra statements.
Statements
A. I think pollution is a crime against society and must be punished.
B. I strongly demand that the chemical factory be closed by legal means, and that the government be criticized for not introducing strict pollution controls.
C. The coming pollution of the environment is one of the biggest problems we are facing now.
D. I think the Darling Chemical Company should be responsible for my husband’s illness.
E. I think that pollution is a widespread problem but that it could be avoided if the government makes the necessary investments.
F. I do not accept that my company is responsible for anything, and people in Darling should be grateful to his company for providing 3,000 jobs.
G. It is generally believed that environmental pollution has adverse effects on human health.
Mrs. Sue Pearson
选项
答案
D
解析
Mrs.Sue Pearson的丈夫去年查出患有癌症,她认为这与化工厂有关,因此要Darling Chemical Company负责。故选D。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/MQzsFFFM
本试题收录于:
公共英语三级笔试题库公共英语(PETS)分类
0
公共英语三级笔试
公共英语(PETS)
相关试题推荐
Aspiringcollegestudentswillbeabletoapplyforfinancialaidthreemonthsearlierthannowandsubmitapreviousyear’sta
WhichofthefollowingisNOTawaytopunishtheonewhocommitsacrime?
CoincidingwiththegroundbreakingtheoryofbiologicalevolutionproposedbyBritishnaturalistCharlesDarwininthe1860s,Br
HowmanychildrendidSusanandMichaelinterview?
Inthe1960stheWestCoastbecameanimportantcenterforrockmusic.LosAngelesandSouthernCaliforniaarefamousforsunshi
Thedemoralizingenvironment,decrepit(老朽的)buildingandminimalmaterialsmakethehighschoolexperienceforthesechildrenan
Payandproductivity,itisgenerallyassumed,shouldberelated.Buttherelationshipseemstoweaken【C1】______peoplegetolder
It’salmostanarticleoffaith:yourbestallyinthefightagainstcancerisadoggedlyoptimisticoutlook.Anditwouldseem
Whatcityisbeingtalkedaboutinthedialogue?
Whatcityisbeingtalkedaboutinthedialogue?
随机试题
民之归仁也,犹水之就下,兽之走圹也。
葡萄胎清除后9周β-HCG持续高水平不包括()
A.位于颈前,收纳舌骨下区,包括喉、环甲膜及气管前的淋巴液,注入颈深下淋巴结B.沿副神经行程分布,收纳枕部、耳后及肩胛上淋巴液,汇入颈深上淋巴结及锁骨上淋巴结C.分上、下两组,上级收纳枕、乳突、鼻咽、腭扁桃体及舌引流的淋巴液,汇入下组淋巴结;下组则收纳
男,43岁,肝炎肝硬化病史5年,出现腹腔积液1年,1周来低热伴轻度腹痛,腹腔积液明显增多。腹腔积液检查:淡黄色,比重1.017,蛋白26g/L,白细胞数500×106/L,中性粒细胞0.80.最可能的诊断是肝硬化合并
金先生欲立自书遗嘱,理财规划师关于自书遗嘱的介绍中错误的是()。
证券公司自营业务的高风险特点主要指()。
决定经济增长的直接因素包括()。
关于公安科研,下列说法正确的是()
五对父子参加一项实验,儿子都只有2岁。每个儿子面前分别放着一个三角形塑料块和一个正方形塑料块。相同形状塑料块的大小相同,不同形状的两种塑料块的颜色都分别是红、黄、蓝、黑和白。实验过程是:让儿子在两个塑料块中随意拿起其中的任意一块。当拿起三角形时,父亲大声说
ArtificialIntelligenceistheareaofcomputerscience/focusingoncreatingmachinesthatcanengageinbehaviours/thathumans
最新回复
(
0
)