首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it,
admin
2017-08-15
26
问题
Suppose you go into a fruiterer’s shop, wanting an apple—you take up one, and on biting it you find it is sour; you look at it, and see that it is hard and green. You take up another one, and that, too, is hard, green, and sour. The shopman offers you a third; but, before biting it, you examine it, and find that it is hard and green, and you immediately say that you will not have it, as it must be sour, like those that you have already tried.
Nothing can be more simple than that, you think; but if you will take the trouble to analyze and trace out into its logical elements what has been done by the mind, you will be greatly surprised. In the first place you have performed the operation of induction. You find that, in two experiences, hardness and greenness in apples went together with sourness. It was so in the first case, and it was confirmed by the second. True, it is a very small basis, but still it is enough from which to make an induction; you generalize the facts, and you expect to find sourness in apples where you get hardness and greenness. You found upon that a general law, that all hard and green apples are sour; and that, so far as it goes, is a perfect induction. Well, having got your natural law in this way, when you are offered another apple which you find it hard and green, you say, "all hard and green apples are sour; this apple is hard and green; therefore, this apple is sour." That train of reasoning is what logicians call a syllogism, and has all its various parts and terms—its major premises, its minor premises, and its conclusion. And by the help of further reasoning, which, if drawn out, would have to be exhibited in two or three other syllogisms, you arrive at your final determination, "I will not have that apple." So that, you see, you have, in the first place, established a law by induction, and upon that you have founded a deduction, and reasoned out the special particular case.
Well now, suppose, having got your conclusion of the law, that at some times afterwards, you are discussing the qualities of apple with a friend; you will say to him, "It is a very curious thing, but I find that all hard and green apples are sour!" Your friend says to you, "But how do you know that?" You at once reply, "Oh, because I have tried them over and over again, and have always found them to be so." Well, if we are talking science instead of common sense, we should call that an experimental verification. And, if still opposed, you go further, and say, "I have heard from people, in Somerset shire and Devon shire, where a large number of apples are grown, and in London, where many apples are sold and eaten, that they have observed the same thing." It is also found to be the case in Normandy, and in North America. In short, I find it to be the universal experience of mankind wherever attention has been directed to the subject. Whereupon, your friend, unless he is a very unreasonable man, agrees with you, and is convinced that you are quite right in the conclusion you have drawn. He believes, although perhaps he does not know he believes it, that the more extensive verifications have been made, and results of the same kind arrived at—that the more varied the conditions under which the same results are attained, the more certain is the ultimate conclusion, and he disputes the question no further. He sees that the experiment has been tried under all sorts of conditions, as to time, place, and people, with the same result; and he says with you, therefore, that the law you have laid down must be a good one, and he must believe it.
Apples are used ______.
选项
A、in order to convince the reader that fruit has no intellect
B、to illustrate the subject of the passage
C、to give color to the story
D、to show how foolish logic is
答案
B
解析
本题表面上问的是吃苹果这一例子,实际上问的是文章的主要内容。从文中内容可知,通过吃苹果的事例讲解了逻辑上的归纳法和演绎法。因此B项为正确答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/MFmYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Medievalistsusuallydistinguishmedievalpubliclawfromprivatelaw:theformerwasconcernedwithgovernmentandmilitaryaff
TheproblemofpollutionaswellasseveralotherissuesisgoingtobediscussedwhentheCongressisin______againnextspring
Inspiteofthewiderangeofreadingmaterialspeciallydesignedor______forlanguagelearningpurposes,thereisyetnoeffect
Wheninhisrebelliousyears,thatiswhenhewassixteenoreighteen,FrankAnderson______goingaroundwithastrangesetofp
Willyou______myarticletofindoutwhetherI’vemadeanymistakes?
Insuchachanging,complexsocietyformerlysimplesolutionstoinformationalneedsbecomecomplicated.Manyoflife’sproblems
Itwas3:45inthemorningwhenthevotewasfinallytaken.Aftersixmonthsofarguingandfinal16hoursofhotparliamentary
Couldthebadolddaysofeconomicdeclinebeabouttoreturn?SinceOPECagreedtosupply-cutsinMarch,thepriceofcrudeoil
Watchababybetweensixandninemonthsold,andyouwillobservethebasicideaofgeometrybeinglearned.Oncethebabyhasm
—Whyareyoustaring?—I’veneverseen______treebefore.
随机试题
以下ACS高危程度分类,正确的是()
男性,30岁。头痛,时有呕吐,逐渐加重1个月,近期嗜睡,反应迟钝,时有头晕、猝倒,无头部外伤及急性炎症病史,血压正常。检查见视神经盘水肿,血常规、红细胞沉降率正常。根据以上的初步诊断,其首选的辅助检查应是
个人外汇账户按账户性质可分为()。
企业将自用房地产转为以公允价值模式计量的投资性房地产。下列关于转换日该房地产公允价值大于账面价值的差额的会计处理表述中,正确的是()。
儿童语言教育的活动观点以与心理学有关的理论,主要是以()的理论作为主要依据。
以往认为最适合哲学的领域,如今已被对人类存在的各方面经验作出成功解释的科学所占领。在一个信息技术取得支配地位的世界上,哲学似乎已败下阵来。它至少不能把智慧切成一个个可以测量的小块提供给人们。在20世纪,有无数哲学家讥讽自己从事的学科,认为哲学活动在经历了三
课程设计
∫0π=________.
设y=,求y’.
ReadthearticlebelowaboutToyLearn,astart-upcompanydevelopingeducationaltoolsforchildren.Foreachquestion(31-40
最新回复
(
0
)