首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Researchers in many countries have observed that middle class children as a group are more successful in the educational system
Researchers in many countries have observed that middle class children as a group are more successful in the educational system
admin
2012-05-18
32
问题
Researchers in many countries have observed that middle class children as a group are more successful in the educational system than working class children. More of the former, for example, reach college. Professor Basil Bernstein of the University of London has argued that there is a link between social class and educational failure and that this link is language. In a series of papers published from 1958 to 1973 Bernstein has developed a theory of the "Structure and process of cultural transmission," or socialization, part of which may be summarized as follows.
One characteristic of many (but not all) working class families is that the status of different members of the family is clearly defined; the authority of the father, for instance, derives from the fact that he is the father. This type of family Bernstein calls positional, and he contrasts it with the person-centered family type, more common (although not omnipresent) in the middle classes. In the latter, status, authority and interpersonal relationships are "Negotiated" according to the unique characteristics of each family member. This negotiation, or lack of it, is reflected linguistically. The following conversation might take place in a positional family:
Child: Can I have an ice cream?
Mother: No.
Child: Why not?
Mother: Because I said so.
In order to justify her refusal of the child’s request, the mother resorts to her authority as mother.
The equivalent exchange in a "person-centered" family might go like this:
Child: Can I have an ice cream?
Mother: No.
Child: Why not?
Mother: Because if you have an ice cream now, you won’t want your lunch later on.
This time an attempt is made to justify the decision in logical terms. In both cases a "reason" is given for denying the ice cream, but the "rational" nature of the explanation given by the second mother leads her to the explicit expression of a statement of condition — "If you have an ice cream now"— and result— "you won’t want your lunch later on."
Now Bernstein is not saying that middle class parents are more rational or articulate or intelligent than working class parents. He notes, however, that if this sort of difference distinguishes a large proportion of the conversations these two children hear in their childhood, then it is reasonable to expect the middle class child to enter school, at age five or six, with the ability to understand and produce a more varied linguistic repertoire, a more "elaborated code" than his working class school friend. The latter may be just as intelligent, but he will probably possess a more "restricted" linguistic code.
Bernstein also recognizes that not all middle class parents’ interactions with their children will be like the (imaginary) example quoted, nor all working class parents’ conversations with their children like the second (imaginary) example. He argues that the middle class child, however, is more likely to reach school age with mastery of both codes, restricted and elaborated. Many (but not all) working class children, on the other hand, will possess the "restricted code" only. This may be just as rich and powerful linguistically, just as complex, just as adequate as a means of expression, but it is not the language of the (often middle class) teacher, of books, of schools, or, more generally, of educational success.
There are several problems with Bernstein’s theory, even in its complete form. In common with other critics, Labov has noted the vagueness of the notion of "code" and, with another population, shown how differences in the speech elicited from working class and middle class subjects are sometimes the product of the elicitation procedures themselves. Rosen has attacked what he sees as the confused political definitions of several of Bernstein’s central concepts, including social class, and the lack of linguistic data with which to support his theoretical claims. Trudgill suggests that the linguistic differences found by Bernstein and his associates (such as more of less frequent use of prepositions, impersonal pronouns, varied adjectives and adverbs, and passives) do not reflect two linguistic codes but simply differences in style.
What is the author’s attitude towards Bernstein’s theory?
选项
A、He is in favour of it.
B、His is objective.
C、He is slightly critical of it.
D、He is strongly critical of it.
答案
B
解析
观点态度题。作者从正反两个方面探讨了语言应用的差异,在结尾处并没有附加自己的观点,可见他的叙述还是客观的。所以选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/MEjYFFFM
0
专业英语八级
相关试题推荐
InInternetaddiction,peoplenotonlybehavedifferentlythanthat【M1】______societywouldconsider"normal",theyalsothinkd
Mostcareersorganizationshighlightthreestagesforgraduatestofollowintheprocessofsecuringasuitablecareer:recogni
RomanticismasaliterarymovementcameintobeinginEnglandearlyinthelatterhalfthe______century.
ThelargestcityinAustraliais______.
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
Ablindbabyisdoublyhandicapped.Notonlyisitunabletosee,butbecauseitcannotreceivethevisualstimulusfromitsenv
Thesameonewordmayhavemorethanonemeaning.Thisiswhatwecall______.
Ourshasbecomeasocietyofemployees.AhundredyearsorsoagoonlyoneoutofeveryfiveAmericansatworkwasemployed,i.
IfyouhavereallybeenstudyingEnglishforsolong,it’sabouttimeyouareabletowritelettersinEnglish.
随机试题
A、自然连接B、交C、投影D、并A关系R和关系S有公共域,关系T是通过公共域的等值进行连接的结果,符合自然连接,选A。
用于巴比妥类药物中毒抢救的药物为
1岁小儿。夏季头皮多处小结节,经久未愈,现疮大如梅,溃破流脓,其口不敛,头皮串空,患处皮肤增厚。诊为
慢性支气管炎所致慢性肺气肿多为
进行工程项目费用控制就是在工程项目进展过程中,进行()工作。
2009年4月1日,王某与丁某签订了房屋买卖合同,双方约定:王某将一栋房屋出售给丁某,房价120万元。丁某支付房屋价款后,王某于2009年4月10日向丁某交付了房屋,但双方没有办理产权转移登记。丁某接收房屋作了装修,于2009年4月20日将该房屋
甲企业2016年初拥有厂房原值2000万元,仓库原值500万元。2016年5月12日,将仓库以1000万元的价格转让给乙企业,当地政府规定房产税减除比例为30%。甲企业当年应缴纳房产税()万元。
从所给的四个选项中,选择最合适的一个填入问号处,使之呈现一定的规律性。
患者,男性,31岁,因左面部巨大毛痣,行毛痣切除植皮术,术后更换敷料的时间是()。
下列关于Ethemet物理层标准命名方法(xType—yName)的描述中,错误的是()。
最新回复
(
0
)