首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
Municipal bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective.
admin
2023-03-07
57
问题
Municipal
bans on smoking in restaurants and bars are highly controversial, but history shows they can also be highly effective. But are all smoking bans equally successful?
The barkeeper and blogger who writes as "Scribbler50" was outraged when, in 2003, New York City enacted one of the first comprehensive smoking bans in bars and restaurants, "How can a guy and some board just kick us in the teeth like this? This smacks of fascism." If people are aware of the consequences of smoking or visiting places with lots of secondhand smoke, should the government really have to tell us what to do? Won’t people just vote with their feet and smoke even more when they’re at home and away from restrictions?
Scribbler50’s post inspired the physician who blogs as "PalMD" last week to look up the research on the effectiveness of smoking bans. He found several studies showing that not only did workers in restaurants and bars show improved health shortly after the bans were put in place, but smokers themselves also reduced the number of cigarettes they smoked.
Overall, however, smoking rates remain persistently high, despite the common workplace smoking bans. Can other government measures help these smokers live healthier lives, or at least prevent people from taking up the habit?
In the U.S., warning messages have been in place on cigarette packages for decades. But the messages are rather clinical, for example: "Smoking Causes Lung Cancer, Heart Disease, and May Complicate Pregnancy." What if packages contained more dramatic warnings? In January, psychologist and science writer Christian Jarrett looked at a small study of smokers’ reactions to cigarette warnings. The researchers measured self-esteem in student smokers, then showed them cigarette packages with either death-related warnings ("Smokers die earlier") or esteem-related warnings ("Smoking makes you unattractive"). Students who derived self-esteem from smoking and saw the death-related warnings later viewed smoking more positively than those who saw the esteem-related warnings. For students whose smoking wasn’t motivated by self-esteem, the effect was reversed.
So not all anti-smoking messages are equal: Depending on who the message is directed at, a morbid warning on a cigarette label may actually
backfire
.
Scribbler50 for his part, is now a convert favoring smoking restrictions, at least in his narrow limits as a bartender. His patrons who haven’t quit smoking say they smoke a lot less now that they have to go outside to get a nicotine fix. He doesn’t miss emptying ashtrays, or the holier-than-thou customers who complained every time a fellow patron lit up, or working in a smoke-filled bar all night and going home "smelling like you put out a three-alarm".
Would it be right to enact even more restrictions on smoking in the interest of public health? It’s hard to deny that banning smoking in public, indoor spaces has been a huge success. Why not try out some stronger smoking bans? Parents in some areas are already restricted from smoking in cars with children, but I haven’t seen a study that evaluates the success of those measures. Perhaps a state or municipality could try extending the ban to homes, with provisions for studying the results. It’s also possible that stronger measures would be counter-productive, like the stronger warnings on cigarette labels. Maybe we’ll decide that at some level deciding whether or not to smoke should still be an individual choice. Or maybe in a few generations, it won’t be necessary to regulate smoking: There won’t be any smokers left.
According to the passage, _____is NOT caused by smoking.
选项
A、miscarriage
B、pollution
C、lung disease
D、heart attack
答案
B
解析
由第5段第2句可知,吸烟的危害包括引发肺癌(对应C)、心脏病(对应D),以及对孕妇产生危害(对应A“流产”),而B“污染”则无提及,故选B。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/LKQiFFFM
本试题收录于:
CATTI三级笔译综合能力题库翻译专业资格(CATTI)分类
0
CATTI三级笔译综合能力
翻译专业资格(CATTI)
相关试题推荐
Skepticsofhighereducationoftencomplainthatuniversitiesoffertoomanyboringdegreeswithlittlevalueintheworkplace.【
Inourcontemporaryculture,theprospectofcommunicatingwith—orevenlookingat—astrangerisvirtuallyunbearable.Everyone
Thinnerisn’talwaysbetter.Anumberofstudieshave【C1】________thatnormal-weightpeopleareinfactathigherriskofsomedi
TheInternetaffordsanonymitytoitsusers,ablessingtoprivacyandfreedomofspeech.Butthatveryanonymityisalsobehind
Justsevenyearsago,theTexasLegislatureprescribedthatallhighschoolersmustpasstwomathcoursesandgeometrytogradua
Iftheonlineserviceisfreethenyouaretheproduct,technicianssay.GoogleandFacebookmakea【C1】________collectingperson
Canada’spremiers(theleadersofprovincialgovernment),iftheyhaveanybreathleftaftercomplainingaboutOttawaattheirl
BradSetser,aneconomistattheCouncilonForeignRelations,istheauthorofanewdiscussionpaperlookingat"thereturnof
Themovementofthesuncreatesperiodsof________.
Whenpeoplebecomeunemployed,itis_____whichisoftenworse,psychologically,thanlackofanincome.
随机试题
防风通圣散的主治病证包括
砖砌无洞墙体高厚比不满足要求时,可采取的有效措施是:
在输入记账凭证过程中,会计核算软件必须提供提示功能,但其中不包括()。
假设一国人口为2000万人,就业人数为900万人,失业人数100万人,那么,该国的失业率为( )。
根据金融犯罪实施主体的不同,金融犯罪可分为()。
甲公司为上市公司。2×14年度至2×16年度,甲公司及其子公司发生的有关交易或事项如下:(1)2×14年1月1日,甲公司以银行存款30500万元从非关联方购入乙公司60%的股权,能够主导乙公司相关活动并获得可变回报。购买日乙公司可辨认净资产的公允价值为5
通常认为人的审美判断是主观的,短时间内的确如此,人们对当代艺术作品的评价就经常出现较大分歧。但是,随着时间的流逝,审美中的主观因素逐渐消失。当一件艺术作品历经几个世纪还能持续给人带来愉悦和美感,如同达芬奇的绘画和巴赫的音乐那样,我们就可以相当客观地称它为伟
在认为“只伤害自己不伤害别人是没有什么大不了”的人忽略了人与人之间相互依赖的关系,摧毁自己的生命或健康并不意味着帮家人和社会做了一点事;相反它意味着耗费了社会中的食品、健康服务、教育等有限的资源而对社会没有作出全部的贡献。 下列观点不能直接从以上文字中
A、 B、 C、 D、 B观察左图可知,A、B、C、D项的图分别是以标号为4、8、8、32为下底面组合的立方体,此时侧面的顺时针标号顺序A项为16,32,8,64;B、C项为2,64,4,32;D项为2,8,
在秦朝,把讯问被告称作()
最新回复
(
0
)