2. 外语
  3. The Metropolitan Police will no longer describe black people as black, as part of a new attempt to counter charges of racism in

The Metropolitan Police will no longer describe black people as black, as part of a new attempt to counter charges of racism in

admin2010-05-25  52
问题    The Metropolitan Police will no longer describe black people as black, as part of a new attempt to counter charges of racism in the force. Both black and Asian people will in future be referred to as "visible minority ethnics".
   The term, which replaces the phrase "black and Asian minority ethnics" is expected to be adopted officially in January.
   The decision was criticized yesterday as unnecessary and confusing by black police officers. Anna Scott, the general secretary of the National Black Police Association, said it amounted to a step too far by the "political correctness" movement.
   "We have gone from saying ’black ethnic minority’ to ’black minority ethnic’ to ’visible minority ethnic’ in a matter of years," she said. "There has been so much emphasis on the issue of terminology, that the issue has become confusing for black police officers, let alone white ones. We are risking becoming too politically correct at the expense of being clearly understood by officers and the general public."
   A senior police official told The Telegraph that some white officers were using the phrase so that they would avoid saying the words "black" or "Asian", for fear of causing offence.
   The official claimed that the term would allow these communities to be distinguished for others—such as the Irish and the Greeks—whose members are, according to the new terminology, "invisible" because they tend to be light-skinned.
   In the 1960s, the phrase "colored" was officially used by some police forces. By the 1970s, this had changed to "black" to describe people whose ancestors originated from the Caribbean and Africa and "Asian" for those who originated from the Indian subcontinent.
   The phrase "ethnic minority" was also widely used as a collective term for both groups, but this was dropped in favor of "minority ethnic" five years ago, promising criticism that it was an improper use of English.
   Bernard Lamb, the chairman of the London branch of the Queen’s English Society, said that the new description was grammatically incorrect and over-sensitive. "I do not like this new term at all. The word ’ethnic’ is an adjective and you cannot pluralize an adjective," he said. "They seem to have used a euphemism for black and Asian when I imagine most black and Asian people do not mind the empty words themselves at all."
   The change will cost a significant sum of public money in retraining officers and rewriting manuals and a spokesman for the Metropolitan Police said that some senior officers were already using the term.
   The spokesman said that the new term was not a redefinition but was meant to standardize the phraseology used by the police.
   "Concerns have been raised about the nature and range of terms used in papers presented to the authority when discussing ethnicity."
   "To ensure that there is a uniform approach and understanding of terminology used in future, and that offence is avoided, the January meeting of the authority’s equal opportunities and diversity board will make decisions about the terminology we expect to use," he said.
The author takes a(an) ______ stance to the shift of names.
选项 A、critical
B、objective
C、indifferent
D、sarcastic
答案B
解析 作者态度题。文章的主要讲述对亚裔和黑人称呼的改变所引起的各方反应，作者是在引述公众、语言学家、白人警察、发言人对名称的变更的评述和反应。作者一直站在观察者的角度来客观报道这桩事件的始末，没有夹杂个人因素。并不是漠然，更不是讽刺，所以选项C 和D 排除；选项A 是干扰项，但是我们应该注意的是，这一切的评价话语，不是作者本人说的，而是引用别人的。所以排除选项A ，故选B 。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/Kl8MFFFM
0

专业英语四级

相关试题推荐
随机试题
最新回复(0)