首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
外语
Doctors at Stanford University are studying a medication they hope will alleviate the suffering of millions of American women. B
Doctors at Stanford University are studying a medication they hope will alleviate the suffering of millions of American women. B
admin
2013-01-25
50
问题
Doctors at Stanford University are studying a medication they hope will alleviate the suffering of millions of American women. But their target isn’t breast cancer, osteoporosis, or a similarly well-known affliction. Despite its alarming impact on its victims, the malady in question has received comparatively little medical scrutiny. It’s a "hidden epidemic," according to the Stanford researchers: compulsive shopping disorder.
That’s right. What was once merely a punchline in television sitcoms is now being taken seriously by many clinicians. According to the Stanford study’s leader, Dr. Lorrin Koran, compulsive shopping is "motivated by ’irresistible’ impulses, characterized by spending that is excessive and inappropriate, has harmful consequences for the individual, and tends to be chronic and stereotyped." Compulsive shoppers "binge buy" --most often clothes, shoes, makeup, and jewelry--and then suffer intense guilt. That, in turn, helps trigger another frenzied trip to the mall, and the cycle continues.
Could compulsive shopping be a health hazard associated with America’s unparalleled economic prosperity? "It seems to be a disease of affluence," says Dr. Jerrold Pollak, a clinical psychologist who’s treated several shopaholics. "Advertisers... would like us to think that shopping is a reason to live," agrees Dr. Cheryl Carmin, another clinical psychologist. "If you do not have the time or inclination to go to the mall or grocery store, there are catalogs, delivery services, home shopping networks on TV, and endless items to buy via the Internet." Indeed, this year, US advertisers will spend $ 233 billion--an amount equal to six federal education budgets to persuade Americans to buy, buy, buy.
Yet the possibility that US advertisers may be driving certain women in our society t9 psychosis is only part of the story. It seems that the pharmaceutical companies’ quest to cure the effects of excessive marketing may itself be little more than a cleverly-disguised marketing scheme. The Stanford study, like many of its kind, is being funded by a pharmaceutical company. The undisclosed drug is an FDA-approved antidepressant, specifically an SSRI--a selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitor. (The researchers are also studying behavioral therapies for compulsive shoppers.)
The researchers running the Stanford study refused to reveal their sponsor. However, only five SSRIs are currently on the US market. Pfizer (makers of Zolofi), Eli Billy (Prozac) and SmithKline Beecham (Paxil) all reported that they are neither conducting nor planning any studies of their drugs for compulsive shopping. Solvay (Luvox)also seems an unlikely candidate. In 1997, researchers at the University of Iowa tried using Luvox to treat compulsive shoppers and found no measurable differences between the effects of the drug and those of a placebo. Perhaps the manufacturers of Luvox want to give their product another shot. More likely, however, the mysterious benefactor of the Stanford Study is Forest Pharmaceuticals (Celexa). Their PR department neither confirmed nor denied any involvement in Koran’s study.
Why would a pharmaceutical company anonymously spend money to license one of its top-selling drugs for a marginal disorder like compulsive shopping? A big part of the answer is profit. The mystery company presumably hopes to carve a unique slice out of the mental disorder pie in order to market it together with a ready-made treatment. This is not at all a new strategy for the world’s mammoth pharmaceutical firms, as David Healy, a professor at the University of Wales College of Medicine, explains in his book "The Anti- Depressant Em." Healy’s book describes a process by which companies Seek to "educate" both patients and clinicians about a new disorder, to sell the disorder in preparation for selling its cure. Funding clinical trials is a crucial part of that process.
We learn at the beginning of the passage that ______.
选项
A、doctors at Stanford University are testing a new drug
B、the consequences of compulsive shopping are minimal
C、compulsive shopping disorder has not received enough attention from the medical community
D、unlike breast cancer or osteoporosis, compulsive shopping disorder defies treatment
答案
C
解析
该题要求理解第一段中的内容。根据第三句,尽管购物成癖所产生的后果是严重的,但没有像其他疾病那样得到足够的医学观察和研究。因此C项为最佳答案。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/JgqYFFFM
0
考博英语
相关试题推荐
Educationalpoliciesmade____thehoofbysuccessivesecretariesofstatearethemainreasonforlowteachermorale.
Interracialmarriagesandrelationshipshavebecomeincreasinglyacceptedandencouragedbysociety.Sincethe1967legalization
Overthepastfewyears,outcriesfromfoodactivistshavechangedmanyAmericans’eatinghabits:Criticismofwidespreadpestici
Therelationshipbetweenformaleducationandeconomicgrowthinpoorcountriesiswidelymisunderstoodbyeconomistsandpoliti
Overthepasttwodecades,thelivesofAmericanwomenhaveundergoneunparalleledchange.TheVirginiaSlimsOpinionPollhasc
Howcanpersonalincometaxbeleviedto____asmanyaspossiblewhileatthesametimeensuringStatefinancesdonotsuffertoo
Themanagergaveherhis_____thatthecomplaintwouldbeinvestigated.
Inhislecture,theeducationexpertemphasizedthefactthatnowadayschildrenareexposedtomanyinfluences_____thatoftheir
High-fructosecornsyrupiseasyforfoodandbeveragemakerstouse,andhas______theformerleadingsweetener;sucrose,oror
Thewaythatpeoplespendtheirmoney,andtheobjectsonwhichtheyspendit,arethelastareaswherefreechoiceandindividu
随机试题
在word2010中,下述关于分栏操作的说法,正确的是()
奶牛,已妊娠7个月。近期发现精神沉郁,弓背,努责,阴门流出红褐色难闻黏稠液体。阴道检查发现子宫颈口开张,阴道及子宫颈黏膜红肿。该牛最可能发生的疾病是
饱和度是用来评价沥青混合料的()。
临时性房屋建筑工程,不适用《房屋建筑和市政基础设施工程竣工验收备案管理办法》(住房和城乡建设部令第2号)的规定。()
【2010年真题】某工程双代号网络计划如下图所示,图中已标出的各个节点的最早时间和最迟时间,该计划表明()。
下面各项中,可以反映企业偿债能力的指标是( )。
影响债券现金流的因素有()。Ⅰ.币种Ⅱ.计付息间隔Ⅲ.债券票面利率Ⅳ.债券的嵌入式期权条款
2004年8月西部省份中固定资产和增速都居第二位的是:( )重庆固定资产投资比四川少______。
《明史·刑法志一》:“自汉以来,刑法沿革不一。隋更五刑之条,设三奏之令。唐撰律令,一准乎礼,以为出入。宋采用之,而所重者敕。律所不载者,则听之于敕。故时轻时重,无一是之归。元制,取所行一时之例为条格而已。明初,丞相李善长等言:‘历代之律,皆以汉《九章》为宗
Thatgrand-sizedpinetree______thehorizon.
最新回复
(
0
)