首页
外语
计算机
考研
公务员
职业资格
财经
工程
司法
医学
专升本
自考
实用职业技能
登录
考研
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of a
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of a
admin
2012-07-23
30
问题
Do we need laws that prevent us from running risks with our lives? If so, then perhaps laws are needed prohibiting the sale of alcoholic drinks.
We’ve already tried that. For 13 years, between 1920 and 1933, there were no liquor stores anywhere in the United States. They were shut down—abolished by an amendment (修正 案). After January 20, 1920, there was supposed to be no more manufacturing, selling, or transporting of "intoxication liquors. " Without any more liquor, people could not drink it. And if they did not drink it, how could they get drunk? There would be no more dangers to the public welfare from drunkenness and alcoholism. It was all very logical. And yet prohibition of liquor, beer, and wine did not work. Why?
Because, law or no law, millions of people still liked to drink alcohol. And they were willing to take risks to get it. They were not about to change their tastes and habits just because of a change in the law. And gangs of liquor smugglers made it easy to buy an illegal drink—or two or three. They smuggled millions of gallons of the illegal beverages (饮料) across the Canadian and Mexican borders. Drinkers were lucky to know of an illegal bar that served Mexican or Canadian liquor. Crime and drunkenness were both supposed to decline as a result of prohibition. Instead people drank more alcohol than ever—often poisoned alcohol.
On December 5, 1933, they removed prohibition by approving the 21st Amendment to the Constitution.
When enacting (颁布) the prohibition laws, government officials assumed that______.
选项
A、every American would buy alcohol illegally
B、all criminal activities would cease
C、patrols of the Canadian border would halt the sale of alcohol
D、the social threat from drunkenness would decline
答案
D
解析
推论题。第2段中自Without至alcoholism的3句话,说明了政府设想通过禁酒以达到D选项所述目的。assume一词含主观设想之意,意思为“以为,认为”。
转载请注明原文地址:https://jikaoti.com/ti/IrjjFFFM
本试题收录于:
GCT工程硕士(英语)题库专业硕士分类
0
GCT工程硕士(英语)
专业硕士
相关试题推荐
What’sthepurposeoftheconference?HowmanyChinesestudentsareinvolvedintheconference?
Somepsychologistsmaintainthatthinkingis______.Fewpeopleareabletolistentofamiliarmusicwithout______.
Evenifit______thisafternoon,Iwillgothere.
Schoolsecretary:Goodmorning.CanIhelpyou?Student:Yes,I’dliketoenrollformecourse.Schoolsecretary:______
Althoughheroesmaycomefromdifferentcultures,they______.GandhiandMartinLutherKingaretypicalexamplesofoutstandin
Accordingtotheauthor,abachelorresistsmarriagechieflybecause______.Raisingchildren,intheauthor’sopinion,is____
Eagerlywatchingthechild’sacquisitionofnewskills______.Inmoralmatters,parentsshould______.
Idon’tthinkMr.Matsonwillcomehereagaintoday.Pleasegivetheticketto______comesherefirst.
Forcenturies,explorershaveriskedtheirlivesventuringintotheunknownforreasonsthatweretovaryingdegreeseconomican
Jack:______?Lora:I’manengineer.Jack:Oh,areyou?Lora:Howaboutyou?Jack:Iworkforatradingcompany.
随机试题
采用间接调频是提高中心频率稳定度的一种简便而有效的办法。
右侧标志表示前方路段解除时速40公里限制。
驾驶机动车遇到这种情况怎样行驶?
与日本人谈判最重要的一点是()
目前认为下述哪种疾病与胃癌的发生密切相关
某工艺性空调房间尺寸为6.0m×4.0m×3.0m,要求恒温为(20±0.5)℃,房间冷负荷为1200W,湿负荷为0,则送风量为_______m3/h时能满足气流组织要求。
甲乙双方于2006年5月5日签订了一份买卖合同。约定:买方收到卖方付货之日起10日内付款。买方于2006年5月30日收到货物却一直不予付款,该笔货款的诉讼时效期间届满的日期为()。
根据我国《水污染防治法》的规定,以下属于防止地表水污染具体规定的有()。
佛教信徒的独特礼节有()。
Howdidthewomandointhedrivingtest?
最新回复
(
0
)